Enhancing State Data Quality: Program for Improving Crash and Inspection Data
Learn about the State Data Quality Review Program focusing on the quality of state crash and inspection data uploaded to MCMIS. Components include preanalysis, on-site visits, documenting processes, and recommendations.
Enhancing State Data Quality: Program for Improving Crash and Inspection Data
E N D
Presentation Transcript
State Data Quality Review Program Improving the Quality of State Crash and Inspection Data Uploaded to MCMIS
State Data Quality Review Program: Components • Select state • Preanalysis • On-site visit • Post Visit • Document data reporting processes, observations and recommendations • State selects which recommendations to pursue • FMCSA technical assistance is available
State Data Quality Program: Components • Select a state • Preanalysis • On-site visit • Post Visit • Document data reporting processes, observations and recommendations • State selects which recommendations to pursue • FMCSA technical assistance is available
State Selection Methodology • State Safety Data Quality (SSDQ) Results • Contribution to the Nation’s data quality performance • State’s willingness to participate
Crash Accuracy SSDQ Results: June 2006 Crash Timeliness 18% 13% 9% 13% 5% 5%
State Data Quality Program: Components • Select state • Preanalysis • On-site visit • Post Visit • Document data reporting processes, observations and recommendations • State selects which recommendations to pursue • FMCSA technical assistance is available
Preanalysis Completed Before the On-Site Visit • SSDQ results (A&I On-Line) • Crash statistics (A&I On-Line) • Ad hoc MCMIS reports • Crash form analysis
State Data Quality Program: Components • Select state • Preanalysis • On-site visit • Post Visit • Document data reporting processes, observations and recommendations • State selects which recommendations to pursue • FMCSA technical assistance is available
Who Participates in an On-Site Visit? • Federal team • HQ representation (when possible) • MCMIS crash and inspection data • Crash form • Collection & reporting process • SafetyNet use • State managers and support staff • Crash and inspection data • Collection, reporting, training
What HappensDuring an On-Site Visit? • Talk to managers • Talk to support staff • Use as series of questions to guide the group through the discussions • Define collection and reporting process • Identify bottlenecks and practices resulting in compromised data quality • Last day Federal team provides draft list of observations
On-Site Visit: Covers Entire Crash Process Input to State System Crash Event Data Collected Upload/ Input To SNET Upload to MCMIS
Observation: Crash Collection Process Compromises Data Accuracy Input to State System Complete Crash Form Data Collected Upload/ Input To SNET Upload to MCMIS
Observation: Crash Collection Process Compromises Data Accuracy • No distinction between interstate and intrastate trucks on crash form • Crash reports sent to the State with common errors (USDOT#, GVWR, cargo body types) • Prior versions of the crash form used
Observation: Crash Reporting Process Compromises Data Accuracy Input to State System Complete Crash Form Data Collected Upload/ Input To SNET Upload to MCMIS
Observation: Crash Reporting Process Compromises Data Accuracy • Missing data filled-in with incorrect information • Conversion of State data elements to SafetyNet elements
Observation: Some Practices and Procedures at the MCSAP Office Compromise Data Quality Input to State System Complete Crash Form Data Collected Upload/ Input To SNET Upload to MCMIS
Observation: Some Practices and Procedures at the MCSAP Office Compromise Data Quality • SafetyNet carrier match process not being used before sending data to MCMIS • Infrequent census updates to SafetyNet • MCSAP office uploads from SafetyNet to MCMIS occurring infrequently
Observation: Not all FMCSA Reportable Crashes are Uploaded to MCMIS Input to State System Complete Crash Form Data Collected Upload/ Input To SNET Upload to MCMIS
Observation: Not all FMCSA Reportable Crashes are Uploaded to MCMIS • State and FMCSA CMV definitions do not match • Officers trained to identify FMCSA reportable crashes according to State’s definition. • State’s definition used to extract FMCSA reportable crashes from State’s database.
State Data Quality Program: Components • Select state • Preanalysis • On-site visit • After the on-site visit • Document data process flows, observations and recommendations • State selects which recommendations to pursue • FMCSA technical assistance is available
After the On-Site Visit: The State is in Control • State decides which recommendations to pursue • FMCSA Technical Assistance is Available • Crash form design to capture FMCSA data elements • Officer training for crash form completion • SafetyNet training
FMCSA Learns Too • Opportunity for the state to give feedback to FMCSA • Improve SafetyNet and MCMIS activity log formats • SafetyNet training course needed for new user
For more information, please contact:Betsy BenkowskiFMCSA, Analysis Division202-366-5387Beth DeysherUSDOT, Volpe Center617-494-2570