1 / 115

Multi-Hazard Loss Estimations Using Socioeconomic Data

J.R. Holliday* J.B. Rundle University of California, Davis. Multi-Hazard Loss Estimations Using Socioeconomic Data. Motivation. Seismic hazard “understood” Seismic risk analysis possible HAZUS-MH (FEMA) ST-RISK (Risk Engineering, Inc) But not for the general population. Motivation.

laurie
Télécharger la présentation

Multi-Hazard Loss Estimations Using Socioeconomic Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. J.R. Holliday* J.B. Rundle University of California, Davis Multi-Hazard Loss Estimations Using Socioeconomic Data Tuesday Oct 29

  2. Tuesday Oct 29 Motivation Seismic hazard “understood” Seismic risk analysis possible • HAZUS-MH (FEMA) • ST-RISK (Risk Engineering, Inc) But not for the general population

  3. Tuesday Oct 29 Motivation Seismic hazard “understood” Seismic risk analysis possible • HAZUS-MH (FEMA) • ST-RISK (Risk Engineering, Inc) But not for the general population

  4. Tuesday Oct 29 Motivation Seismic hazard “understood” Seismic risk analysis possible • HAZUS-MH (FEMA) • ST-RISK (Risk Engineering, Inc) But not for the general population

  5. Tuesday Oct 29 Motivation Seismic hazard “understood” Seismic risk analysis possible • HAZUS-MH (FEMA) • ST-RISK (Risk Engineering, Inc) But not for the general population

  6. Tuesday Oct 29 Motivation Seismic hazard “understood” Seismic risk analysis possible • HAZUS-MH (FEMA) • ST-RISK (Risk Engineering, Inc) But not for the general population

  7. Tuesday Oct 29 Motivation Seismic hazard “understood” Seismic risk analysis possible • HAZUS-MH (FEMA) • ST-RISK (Risk Engineering, Inc) But not for the general population

  8. Tuesday Oct 29 Motivation

  9. Tuesday Oct 29 Earthquake Forecasts • USA: USGS • Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF) • “24-Hour Aftershock Forecast Map” • 2009 Earthquake Probability Mapping • http://www.openhazards.com/ • World: CSEP • Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) • Beyond RELM • http://www.openhazards.com/

  10. Tuesday Oct 29 Earthquake Forecasts • USA: USGS • Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF) • “24-Hour Aftershock Forecast Map” • 2009 Earthquake Probability Mapping • http://www.openhazards.com/ • World: CSEP • Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) • Beyond RELM • http://www.openhazards.com/

  11. Tuesday Oct 29 Earthquake Forecasts • USA: USGS • Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF) • “24-Hour Aftershock Forecast Map” • 2009 Earthquake Probability Mapping • http://www.openhazards.com/ • World: CSEP • Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) • Beyond RELM • http://www.openhazards.com/

  12. Tuesday Oct 29 Earthquake Forecasts • USA: USGS • Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF) • “24-Hour Aftershock Forecast Map” • 2009 Earthquake Probability Mapping • http://www.openhazards.com/ • World: CSEP • Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) • Beyond RELM • http://www.openhazards.com/

  13. Tuesday Oct 29 Earthquake Forecasts • USA: USGS • Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF) • “24-Hour Aftershock Forecast Map” • 2009 Earthquake Probability Mapping • http://www.openhazards.com/ • World: CSEP • Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) • Beyond RELM • http://www.openhazards.com/

  14. Tuesday Oct 29 Ground Shaking • Full propagation methods • OpenSHA • CyberShake • Simple propagation approximations

  15. Tuesday Oct 29 Ground Shaking • Full propagation methods • OpenSHA • CyberShake • Simple propagation approximations

  16. Tuesday Oct 29 Ground Shaking • Full propagation methods • OpenSHA • CyberShake • Simple propagation approximations

  17. Tuesday Oct 29 Ground Shaking • Full propagation methods • OpenSHA • CyberShake • Simple propagation approximations

  18. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking • What’s necessary? • Source location • Target location • Magnitude • Possible enhancements • Soil classification • Basin effects

  19. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking • What’s necessary? • Source location • Target location • Magnitude • Possible enhancements • Soil classification • Basin effects

  20. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking • What’s necessary? • Source location • Target location • Magnitude • Possible enhancements • Soil classification • Basin effects

  21. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking • What’s necessary? • Source location • Target location • Magnitude • Possible enhancements • Soil classification • Basin effects

  22. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking • What’s necessary? • Source location • Target location • Magnitude • Possible enhancements • Soil classification • Basin effects

  23. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with log polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  24. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with log polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  25. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with log polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  26. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with 4th order polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  27. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with log polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  28. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with 4th order polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  29. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with log polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  30. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with log polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  31. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with log polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  32. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with log polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  33. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with log polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  34. Tuesday Oct 29 Simple Ground Shaking (cont) • Focus on PGA only • Following Cua (2005) • Parameterize PGA(r) with log polynomial • Fit historic data (using shakemap.org) • Estimate variance/uncertainty • Test against global data • Results are surprisingly good!

  35. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response • Given PGA, how much damage will occur? • How do we describe the building? Building frame Wall type Floor plan Square footage Number of levels Chimney Attached garage Wall anchors Foundation type Year of construction • Which of these are necessary?

  36. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response • Given PGA, how much damage will occur? • How do we describe the building? Building frame Wall type Floor plan Square footage Number of levels Chimney Attached garage Wall anchors Foundation type Year of construction • Which of these are necessary?

  37. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response • Given PGA, how much damage will occur? • How do we describe the building? Building frame Wall type Floor plan Square footage Number of levels Chimney Attached garage Wall anchors Foundation type Year of construction • Which of these are necessary?

  38. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response • Given PGA, how much damage will occur? • How do we describe the building? Building frame Wall type Floor plan Square footage Number of levels Chimney Attached garage Wall anchors Foundation type Year of construction • Which of these are necessary?

  39. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response • Given PGA, how much damage will occur? • How do we describe the building? Building frame Wall type Floor plan Square footage Number of levels Chimney Attached garage Wall anchors Foundation type Year of construction • Which of these are necessary?

  40. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response • Given PGA, how much damage will occur? • How do we describe the building? Building frame Wall type Floor plan Square footage Number of levels Chimney Attached garage Wall anchors Foundation type Year of construction • Which of these are necessary?

  41. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response (cont) • Simple Method • Graf and Lee (Earthquake Spectra, 2009) • Inputs • PGA • Construction Framing • Output • Fraction of building damaged • Easy to “enhance”

  42. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response (cont) • Simple Method • Graf and Lee (Earthquake Spectra, 2009) • Inputs • PGA • Construction Framing • Output • Fraction of building damaged • Easy to “enhance”

  43. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response (cont) • Simple Method • Graf and Lee (Earthquake Spectra, 2009) • Inputs • PGA • Construction Framing • Output • Fraction of building damaged • Easy to “enhance”

  44. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response (cont) • Simple Method • Graf and Lee (Earthquake Spectra, 2009) • Inputs • PGA • Construction Framing • Output • Fraction of building damaged • Easy to “enhance”

  45. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response (cont) • Simple Method • Graf and Lee (Earthquake Spectra, 2009) • Inputs • PGA • Construction Framing • Output • Fraction of building damaged • Easy to “enhance”

  46. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response (cont) • Simple Method • Graf and Lee (Earthquake Spectra, 2009) • Inputs • PGA • Construction Framing • Output • Fraction of building damaged • Easy to “enhance”

  47. Tuesday Oct 29 Building Response (cont) • Simple Method • Graf and Lee (Earthquake Spectra, 2009) • Inputs • PGA • Construction Framing • Output • Fraction of building damaged • Easy to “enhance”

  48. Tuesday Oct 29 Putting It All Together • Create an earthquake forecast • Using the forecast as a density function, convolve a ground-shaking estimation with all possible earthquake sources • Create PGA Exceedance curves for all locations • Use the exceedance curves as inputs to damage calculations.

  49. Tuesday Oct 29 Putting It All Together • Create an earthquake forecast • Using the forecast as a density function, convolve a ground-shaking estimation with all possible earthquake sources • Create PGA Exceedance curves for all locations • Use the exceedance curves as inputs to damage calculations.

  50. Tuesday Oct 29 Putting It All Together • Create an earthquake forecast • Using the forecast as a density function, convolve a ground-shaking estimation with all possible earthquake sources • Create PGA Exceedance curves for all locations • Use the exceedance curves as inputs to damage calculations.

More Related