1 / 15

The Challenge and Strength of Rock Lobster Governance in New Zealand

The Challenge and Strength of Rock Lobster Governance in New Zealand. Tracy Yandle Emory University tyandle@emory.edu. Tracy. Thank You’s. New Zealand Rock Lobster Industry Council Daryl Sykes (NZ RLIC) Helen Regan (NZ RLIC) University Research Committee (Emory University). Overview.

lave
Télécharger la présentation

The Challenge and Strength of Rock Lobster Governance in New Zealand

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Challenge and Strength of Rock Lobster Governance in New Zealand Tracy Yandle Emory University tyandle@emory.edu

  2. Tracy

  3. Thank You’s • New Zealand Rock Lobster Industry Council • Daryl Sykes (NZ RLIC) • Helen Regan (NZ RLIC) • University Research Committee (Emory University)

  4. Overview • Fishery Description • History of Rock Lobster Management • Regulatory Summary • Key Events in Developing Co-Management • Why Co-Management Developed • Organization of Rock Lobster Co-Management • Effects of Rock Lobster Co-Management • Lessons • Challenges

  5. Fishery Description • Small vessels (potting) fishing into large processing & export companies • 3rd largest seafood export • ITQ management supplemented with co-management

  6. History: Rock Lobster Regulatory Summary

  7. History: Catch & CPUE

  8. History: Developing Rock Lobster Co-Management

  9. Why Did Co-Management Develop? • Social Capital • Tradition of involvement in fishery • Involvement institutionalized through government’s and fishers’ actions • Property Rights • ITQs expanding perception property rights • Provided incentive to take on management responsibilities

  10. Organization of Rock Lobster Co-Management (1) • 9 CRAMACs • regional organizations • Heart of rock lobster co-management • Characteristics vary by region • Membership & voting rules • Pressure & interactions from other interests • Activities • Develop own projects and cooperate with NZ RLIC projects

  11. Organization of Rock Lobster Co-Management (2) • Rock Lobster Industry Council (NZ RLIC) • CRAMACs appoint representatives to NZ RLIC board • Voting and contribution proportionate to regional TACC • Funded through levy • Provides representation, technical assistance, & coordination to CRAMACs • Research provider to Ministry of Fisheries • New Zealand Seafood Industry Council (SeaFIC) • Stakeholder groups (e.g., NZ RLIC) are shareholders • Provides generic advice and advocacy for seafood industry • Employs research scientists who contract with NZ RLIC for stock assessment research

  12. Effects of Co-Management • Outputs • Catch is down • CPUE is up • Stock is sustainable (given uncertainty) • BUT – what is effect of ITQ vs co-management??? • Management Process • Increased participation by fishers and industry • Documented at national and regional levels • Participation in rule-making increases compliance & robustness of regime

  13. Lessons • Development of co-management was long-term process • Social capital AND property rights vital • Long-term policies encouraging these characteristics may be more useful than quick regulatory change in a vacuum

  14. Challenges • Separation of catching rights from ownership rights • Need to define ALL extractors’ rights • Both issues threaten incentives to participate in co-management

  15. Questions?

More Related