1 / 8

Perkins Accountability Framework: Requirements, Indicators, & Improvement Plans

This comprehensive guide details the accountability measures under Perkins legislation. States are required to address performance on various indicators for local education agencies, including special populations, assessments, and performance targets. The process involves negotiating improvement plans, assessments, monitoring, and compliance to ensure educational effectiveness. Contact information for key personnel is provided for assistance.

Télécharger la présentation

Perkins Accountability Framework: Requirements, Indicators, & Improvement Plans

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ACCOUNTABILITYUNDER PERKINS KEY ELEMENTS

  2. REQUIREMENTS • STATES MUST ADDRESS THE PERFORMANCE OUTLINED IN SECTION 113b OF PERKINS • OPTIONS • A. THROUGH 5-YEAR LOCAL APPLICATIONS & ANNUAL UPDATES • B. THROUGH ANNUAL LOCAL APPLICATIONS

  3. Report What?Section 123c • Performance on 8 Secondary indicators and 6 P/S indicators for the state and local education agencies. • Disaggregated data on 14 indicators (113c) • Special populations • Gender • Ethnicity • Participation (Participants and Concentrators) • State Institutions (prisons and special schools) • Assessments used to determine skill attainment.

  4. Performance Targets122C • Negotiated between state and Dept of Education (OCTAE) • Negotiated between state and Local Education Agency or Consortium. (122c & 113b) • Annual • Must show improvement on path to 100% • Based upon historical performance

  5. Improvement Plans123a • Indicator achievement below 90% of target • Assessments • Local performance and plans • Response to monitoring visits (state or federal) • Performance gaps

  6. ASSESSMENTS124c • Making improvements for • Validity • Reliability • Coverage

  7. MONITORING • Must review local education agencies and plans (134b) • Must review Consortiums or pooled resources (134c) • Must comply with Perkins requirements or take remedial action (improvement plan IAW 113b & 123b)

  8. ACCOUNTABILITY CONTACTS • RAS – Jay Savage, 202-245-6612 • Finance – Andrew Johnson • PAL – Laura Messenger • EdFacts Coordinator - ????

More Related