1 / 17

Private equity performance and asset allocation: impact of low rates and the J curve of cash flows

Private equity performance and asset allocation: impact of low rates and the J curve of cash flows. Financial Risks International Forum Paris – March 2019 Edouard Nouvellon (ULB). Outline. Introduction Private equity performances - literature review The impact of the J curve on the IRR

lawsons
Télécharger la présentation

Private equity performance and asset allocation: impact of low rates and the J curve of cash flows

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Private equity performance and asset allocation: impact of low rates and the J curve of cash flows Financial Risks International Forum Paris – March 2019 Edouard Nouvellon (ULB)

  2. Outline • Introduction • Private equity performances - literature review • The impact of the J curve on the IRR • Modeling the combined impact of of the J curve’s shape and the deposit rates level • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • Family Offices and ultra high networthindividualsinvest more and more in PrivateEquityfunds • Commitedamount has been growingfrom 10 bnUsd in 1991 to 180 bnUsd in 2000 • In 2018, private asset market size close to 5,2 tr USD

  4. Privateequityinvesting Firm 1 Firm 2 Firm 3 USD Equityholder USD Equityholder USD Equityholder General partner USD USD USD USD Limtedpartners n-1 Limtedpartners n Limtedpartners 1 Limtedpartners 2

  5. Privateequityinvesting 10 / 12 years Investment period (4-5y) Exits period (4-6y) Fundraising (0,5 – 1 y) General partners closes investments and call(cash flows fromlimitedpartners to generalpartner) the commited capital fromlimitedpartners Limited partnerscommit (no cash outflow) a fixedamount to General Partners for them to takeshareholderequityduring the cominginvestmentperiod General partnersrealise exits and repaylimitedpartnerswith a realized positive return (cash flows fromgeneralpartner to limitedpartners)

  6. Privateequity performances • No transaction basedprices as liquid assets • Measuresfrom cash outflow and inflowfromlimitedpartners • Multiple on invested capital (MOIC) • Internal rate of return (IRR) IRR starting point = capital call IRR ending point = capital back to limitedpartners IRR measuredon’tinclude time betweencommitment and capital call

  7. Privateequity performances • Reported IRR by generalpartners close to 10% • Over performance on public equitiesis an open debate • 1,75% in 90’s and 1,5% in 2000’s - Kaplan [2015] • Liquidity and risk premium required for risk and illliquidity over listedequitiesiswidelyconsidered to 3 % • Existingliteraturemainly focus on this performance taken the IRR as given by General Partners

  8. Research question • Ultimate performance to the investorsshouldtakeintoaccount the commited but univestedperiod on which the return is not the same • Opportunity cost of the cash commited but not calledyet • This opportunitycostdepends • On the shape of the capital call • On the return during the periodbefore capital iscalled • This return isusually the risk free rate in order to avoidmarket and liquidityrisks

  9. J curve and IRR • J curverepresents the investor’s cash flow shape in % of commited capital • Entire J curveknown a posteriori after exits realized by the generalpartner Multiple on investment capital = 150% IRR = 10% In line with 3% risk premium on listedequities

  10. J curve and IRR • IRR measuretakesonlyaccounts the « cash at work » period • The investordoes not know when the commited cash willbe call, it as at pure generalpartner’ discretion • Quasi impossible to allocate the commited cash to risky assets • We assume that the cash commitedisinvested in cash depositwithzero duration

  11. Deposit rate impact on IRR for one J Curve • Corrected IRR with 3% deposit rate • Corrected IRR = 7,97%

  12. Deposit rate impact on IRR for one J Curve • Influence of deposit rate on IRR with the same J curve • Deposit rate has to be 9,1% to get 10% IRR as promised by privateequity

  13. Combined J curveshape and deposit rate • J curve simulation withsame 150% Multiple on Capital • Cash outflows • Considering 5 yearsinvestmentperiod • 100% commited cash invested by the generalpartner (assumption) • Cash inflows • Considering 10 yearsperiodwithoverlappwithinvestmentperiod • In order to correct the bias of concentration (high cash flow on the first twoyears), weapply 20 permutations

  14. Combined J curveshape and deposit rate

  15. Combined J curveshape and deposit rate • IRR distribution with 0% deposit rate Average IRR : 6,2% More than 93% IRR are below the 10% initial IRR Min IRR : 3,04% Max IRR : 26,96% The J curveshapeis crucial for the limitedpartners IRR

  16. Combined J curveshape and deposit rate • Resultswithdeposit rate revenues included in IRR The deposit rate during the commitment-not calledperiodcan bring close to 2% difference in IRR of privateequity

  17. Conclusion / Extension • The promised IRR by private equity is not totally delivered as we take into account the cash commitment’ impact on the whole asset allocation • The delivered IRR is on the cash at work • The shape of J curve has a crucial role on the private equity performance • The low rates also conditions the final private equity performances • The risk premium on listed equity can be deeply challenged

More Related