1 / 29

Coupling of carbon and nitrogen cycles through humic redox reactions in an alpine stream

Coupling of carbon and nitrogen cycles through humic redox reactions in an alpine stream. Diane McKnight, Matt Miller, Rose Cory and Mark Williams Depart. Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado. NWTLTER: C & N transport and reactivity in Green Lakes Valley.

lazar
Télécharger la présentation

Coupling of carbon and nitrogen cycles through humic redox reactions in an alpine stream

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Coupling of carbon and nitrogen cycles through humic redox reactions inan alpine stream Diane McKnight, Matt Miller, Rose Cory and Mark Williams Depart. Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado

  2. NWTLTER: C & N transport and reactivity in Green Lakes Valley Response of pristine, cold regions to climate change and N enrichment

  3. Hyporheic Zone: “hotspot” of biogeochemical reactions driven by mixing across redox gradient

  4. Redox Couples Oxidizing Conditions O2 H2O NO3- N2, NH4+ Mn(IV) Mn(II) Fe(III) Fe(II) Oxidized Humics Reduced Humics SO42- H2S Reducing Conditions

  5. CO2 e- e- Acetate DOM reducing microorganism Reduced DOM Oxidized DOM Photoreduction of Ferric to Ferrous Iron Humics act as electron shuttle Fe3+ Fe2+ NO2-+ DOM DOM-N Ferrous Wheel Hypothesis NO3-

  6. Tracer experiment: Navajo Meadow Stream *elevation~3,750m *formed by snowmelt and glacial runoff *surrounded by alpine wetland *~150m in length

  7. Approach: Tracer injection experiment and modeling with OTIS Main Channel: Lateral inflow Advection Dispersion Transient storage Storage Zone: Transient storage s

  8. Approach: Fluorescence index (Em450/Em500 @ 370 nm Ex, and EEM’s (Excitation and emission over a range of wavelengths) Excitation (nm) Emission (nm) Humic Peaks: (quinone moieties) Protein Peak

  9. PARAFAC Excitation-emission matrix (EEM) Comp. 1 Comp. 2 Comp. 3

  10. “HQ” “Q” Quinones found in enzymes, e.g ubiquinone, and formed by lignin oxidation. • Forms of this complex are found throughout cells • Important in electron transfer reactions, such as the oxidation of NADH • Also known as coenzyme Q Ubiquinone

  11. Quinone fluorescence AQDS/AHDS useful as models for humic fluorescence

  12. Stream Br- Addition, July 10 Background [Br-] = 0 mg/L Reach 3 Reach 2 Reach 1

  13. Storage Zone Br- Simulation Reach 3 Reach2 Reach 1 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L

  14. Connectivity of wells • Br, Ca, del 18O & D on July 10 • Ca, del 18O & D on July 17, 24

  15. Stream Chemistry July 17th July 10th July 24th DOC LF FI SR SUVA

  16. Stream-Well Comparisons B A A A,B A B A,B A B B A A A FI Well 1 = No and Low Br, Well 2 = High Br

  17. Stream Site EEMs S1 S2 S3 July 10th (tracer) July 17th July 24th

  18. Well Site EEMs Characteristic Humic Peaks Protein Peaks July 10th, V13 July 17th, V15 July 17th, V25

  19. PARAFAC Components Red-shifted: C2 (HQ1), C3 (HQ2) Blue-shifted: C5 (Q) Protein: C9 2 5

  20. Ex, Em spectra for HQ1 and HQ2 Note: similar excitation spectra

  21. Comparison of HQ1 and AHDS Em and Ex spectra: Same ex. max and shape. Emission max are different, probably related to H bonding, solvent, excited state rxns

  22. Comparison of Q and AQDS Very similar ex and em max (ex 260 nm; em max at 418 nm). Similar features of spectra, Q has broader peaks as typical for humics

  23. Stream-Well Comparisons C B C A A Well 1 = No and Low Br Well 2 = High Br F = (Σ HQ1, HQ2) / (Q)

  24. Two Components Explain Fluorescence Index

  25. CO2 e- e- Acetate DOM reducing microorganism Reduced DOM Oxidized DOM Photoreduction of Ferric to Ferrous Iron Humics act as electron shuttle Fe3+ Fe2+ NO2-+ DOM DOM-N Ferrous Wheel Hypothesis NO3-

  26. Ferrous Wheel: Addition of Ferric Nitrate to reduced DOM samples with high ferrous iron concentrations, causes decrease in ferrous due to nitrate reduction. NOTE: Addition of Ferric Citrate causes ferrous iron to INCREASE.

  27. Hyporheic zone interactions, e.g. humic redox!!, hotspot of C & N interactions, influencing N transport in alpine systems. Fluorescence index = HQ1/HQ2 FI increases with microbial sources (primary and secondary) Nitrogen and Carbon cycling coupled by biotic and chemical processes

  28. Questions?

  29. Ferrous Wheel Results: Added Ferric Nitrate to Samples with high ferrous iron concentrations.. NOTE: get different results when ferric citrate added, in that case ferrous iron INCREASES.

More Related