1 / 7

Environment and Security: Management, coordination

The Fourth Interregional Meeting of representatives from the environmental protection committees of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan was held in Dushanbe on July 11-12, 2006. Key discussions included the future of projects in the Ferghana Valley, emphasizing the need for project assessments, funding support, and national coordination. The meeting identified opportunities for continuing or replicating successful projects while addressing challenges faced by unsuccessful ones. The outcomes will inform the work plan for 2008-2010, promoting enhanced collaboration among stakeholders and securing environmental priorities.

leo-harris
Télécharger la présentation

Environment and Security: Management, coordination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Environment and Security: Management, coordination Четвертая межрегиональная встреча представителей областных комитетов охраны природы Кыргызстана, Таджикистана и Узбекистана г. Душанбе, 11-12 июля 2006 Ben Slay, Director UNDP Bratislava Regional Centre

  2. June Management Board meeting: Key questions • Future of Ferghana Valley projects: • Finalisation versus continuation • Need for project assessments • Support for national focal points • Funding for assistants • National coordination groups • Links between CARNET, Aarhus centres

  3. When to finalise? • Unsuccessful projects • Insufficient donor or programme country support for continuation • Successful projects that: • Cannot be scaled up or replicated • Should be in a different programme (GEF?) • Have high opportunity costs • Resources should be redeployed elsewhere

  4. When to continue? • Project enjoys continued support from: • Programme country(s) • Donors • A clear decision can be made about whether the project should be: • Continued • Replicated • Scaled up • Outcome: inclusion into Ferghana Valley work plan for 2008-2010

  5. Assistance to National Focal Points • ENVSEC Management Board acknowledges the need; • Funding modalities in question: • Should be linked to specific project; • Should be hired by CO and report principally to RDO

  6. National coordination groups • Principal body for coordination with: • Stakeholders • Other donors, projects, international agencies • Best modality for IAEA coordination • Country assistants to facilitate groups • Routines at the individual project level needed if this coordination is to work

  7. Roles of CARNet, Aarhus Centres • Links between Osh Aarhus Centre and CARNet established • Work still needed: • REHRA: information dissemination can improve • RESCA: routines for coordination lacking • Other projects: similar issues

More Related