1 / 5

The Reviewing Process Marie desJardins AAAI-13 Panel Conference Reviewing Best Practices

The Reviewing Process Marie desJardins AAAI-13 Panel Conference Reviewing Best Practices. Conference Reviewing. Program committees Selection process Different models/roles: Senior vs. area chair vs. regular members Paper assignments Keyword-based

leoneg
Télécharger la présentation

The Reviewing Process Marie desJardins AAAI-13 Panel Conference Reviewing Best Practices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Reviewing ProcessMarie desJardinsAAAI-13 PanelConference Reviewing Best Practices

  2. Conference Reviewing • Program committees • Selection process • Different models/roles: • Senior vs. area chair vs. regular members • Paper assignments • Keyword-based • Similarity-based (compare to reviewer’s published papers) • Self-selection (bidding) • Discussion and author response • Decisions Review Process and Quality

  3. Purpose of a Review • Evaluate the paper’s scientific merit • Check the validity of the paper’s claims and evidence • Judge the paper’s relevance and significance • Provide constructive feedback to the author Review Process and Quality

  4. AAAI-13 Review Criteria • Goal: identify “interesting but flawed” papers and make sure they are reviewed fairly • Different ways in which a paper can make a contribution • Avoid a conference full of “technically acceptable but uninteresting and incremental” papers • Quality criteria: • Technical quality • Experimental analysis • Formal analysis • Clarity/presentation • Innovation criteria: • Novelty/innovation of question / solution • Impact criteria: • Breadth of interest • Potential for impact Review Process and Quality

  5. Good Reviews Are... • Polite • Fair • Concise • Clear • Constructive • Specific • Well documented • Represent the scientific community Review Process and Quality

More Related