1 / 6

Masahiro Kuroda marsh@nict.go.jp Takashi Sakakura sakakura@isllco.co.jp

L2 Trigger Implementation Examples on MIRAI-SF Simulator - A Candidate for 802.21 Evaluation Platform. Masahiro Kuroda marsh@nict.go.jp Takashi Sakakura sakakura@isl.melco.co.jp. A brief explanation of MIRAI-SF. Written in Java

les
Télécharger la présentation

Masahiro Kuroda marsh@nict.go.jp Takashi Sakakura sakakura@isllco.co.jp

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. L2 Trigger Implementation Examples on MIRAI-SF Simulator- A Candidate for 802.21 Evaluation Platform Masahiro Kuroda marsh@nict.go.jp Takashi Sakakura sakakura@isl.melco.co.jp

  2. A brief explanation of MIRAI-SF • Written in Java • Equips a discrete event simulator engine which provides simple simulation building blocks; Entity, Process, in-outChannel, Event • Prepared network components utilizing the building blocks • Signaling servers • L2 switches • Routers • NICs • Radio APs and Devices • Communication stacks • Applications • Network simulation is described in MNDL a network description language deploying the components NICT & Mitsubishi Electric

  3. Comparison scenarios Defined FMIPv6 and L2 handoff models on same terminal mobility model (way-point) and AP deployment • FMIPv6 • Data forwarding between old and new routers • Pre-assigning of CoA and authentication data • L2 triggers • Reconnection on terminal • MAC address of new router • Mobility support at L2 • No configuration change at the IP layer • Less signaling traffic for supporting terminal mobility NICT & Mitsubishi Electric

  4. Animated simulation result • Let’s see! NICT & Mitsubishi Electric

  5. L2 configuration FMIPv6 NICT & Mitsubishi Electric

  6. Conclusion and Future Activities • L2mobility support achieves in half of signaling traffic comparing FMIPv6 • L2 mobility support can provide IPv4/v6 independent mobility service • Estimate the upcoming proposals from the 21 and other working groups to the 21 (e.g. beacon implementation on the MIRAI-SF simulator) • Consider power saving for hybrid radio terminals NICT & Mitsubishi Electric

More Related