1 / 11

Regional highlights of R-PINs Africa Region

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. Regional highlights of R-PINs Africa Region. By FCPF Technical Advisory Panel. FCPF Steering Committee Meeting Paris, July 9 and 10, 2008. 10 countries from Africa submitted their R-PINs before May 30, 2008

lev-pugh
Télécharger la présentation

Regional highlights of R-PINs Africa Region

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Regional highlights of R-PINs Africa Region By FCPF Technical Advisory Panel FCPF Steering Committee Meeting Paris, July 9 and 10, 2008

  2. 10 countries from Africa submitted their R-PINs before May 30, 2008 • R-PINs submitted for consideration by SC were complete and used the latest R-PIN template • 8 countries being considered in the SC meeting • Central African Republic • Democratic Republic of Congo • Gabon (in French) • Ghana • Kenya • Liberia • Madagascar • Republic of Congo Overview

  3. Africa: A variety of situations • Forest rich, low deforestation: • Gabon • Republic of Congo • Forest rich, high deforestation: • DR-Congo  variety of situations (humid, mountains, savanna) • Liberia  after conflict situation, revamping of forestry activities • Central African Republic  degradation in humid forest zone • Ghana  fragmentation of forests, agricultural expansion • Forest poor, high deforestation: • Madagascar  poverty, population growth, biodiversity hotspots • Kenya  intensive use of dry lands, energy • With commercial logging: • Gabon, Republic of Congo, DRC, CAR, Ghana • Without commercial logging: • Kenya, Madagascar, Liberia

  4. REDD – Issues on Methodologies • Forest degradation is not routinely monitored / estimated • National capacity to monitor forest cover changes is crucial to REDD Programmes – includes techniques to estimate both above / below ground biomass • Low national capacity to monitor forest cover changes major bottleneck • Use of projections of future DD scenarios proposed by many countries • Many countries make the link to the larger Environmental Services agenda General Observations

  5. REDD – Policy Issues • Coordination among national agencies will be complex but important to address • Countries showed strong support to involving communities in forest management • Land tenure - complex governance issue that could jeopardize REDD • Clarifying Emission / carbon rights - reaching the poor is a priority Generalobservations

  6. Ownership of R-PIN and REDD Agenda • Interest up to the highest political level to tackle the issue of DD with new tools and instruments; however • Countries are at different stages of discussions of REDD at the national level; • Interest among countries is high though in some countries there was substantial inputs from external consultants – a capacity constraint Generalobservations

  7. Congo Basin countries (CAR, DRC, Gabon, Rep. of Congo) proposed a regional approach to monitoring forest cover, through COMIFAC’s OFAC (Central Africa Forest Observatory) • CAR, DRC and Rep of Congo have proposed impressive methods to estimate biomass hence carbon stocks • Ghana proposes an integrated forest monitoring system • DRC presents a concrete case of the need for modeling future deforestation/degradation. Issue of palm oil plantations • Liberia already has an impressive national grid of sample plots to assess forest carbon stock • Madagascar proposes a “participatory ecological monitoring” for biodiversity Monitoring Systems and Reference Scenario

  8. CAR, DRC and Republic of Congo - emphasis on improving their forest concession management (maintaining existing carbon stocks) • Gabon implementation of REDD projects based on future deforestation scenarios, including PES (Payment for environmental services) for forest-dependant people • Kenya proposes activities “outside forests” (agriculture & energy) to address deforestation and degradation and promotion of PES schemes • Liberia proposes to integrate REDD into its “3 C’s” strategy to forests – communities, conservation & commericial • Madagascar proposes a nested approach (combined national and project level approach) REDD Strategies

  9. Gabon, Ghana and Kenya envisaging establishment of PES schemes to change land use behavior • Liberiasuggests the establishment of strong institutional mechanism to coordinate REDD activities (National Carbon Working Group) with the overall sustainable development agenda • Madagascar has a national “REDD Group” in place that meets regularly, discussing issues such as the development of a REDD revenues distribution mechanism Infrastructure to implement REDD activities

  10. DRC is currently implementing the first forest carbon finance project in the country: Bateke fuelwood plantations • Gabon is currently improving its large scale forest concessions (CFADs) system and has created 13 new protected areas • Ghana has very active policy dialogue w/ donors on forest resources, through a multi-donor operation (Natural Resources and Environmental Governance) – high chance of success for REDD • Kenya has experience in A/R CDM, the Greenbelt Movement’s reforestation project (w/ BioCF support) • Madagascar has experience w/ three ongoing REDD projects on the ground (two linked with protected areas, one to the development of a national REDD concept) Potential effectiveness of proposed REDD strategies, and previous experiences

More Related