1 / 13

FRPA Resource Evaluation Program: A Partnership Approach to Resource Stewardship Monitoring and Evaluations

This program aims to determine if forest and range policies and practices in BC are achieving the government's objectives for FRPA resource values. It involves routine and intensive monitoring at the district/regional and provincial levels, with feedback provided to decision makers for continuous improvement.

lhegarty
Télécharger la présentation

FRPA Resource Evaluation Program: A Partnership Approach to Resource Stewardship Monitoring and Evaluations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FRPA RESOURCE EVALUATION PROGRAM • A partnership approach to resource stewardship monitoring and evaluations

  2. Policy Realm FRPA Compliance and Enforcement Plan & Practice Requirements Objectives Professional Reliance Effectiveness Evaluation FRPA Framework

  3. FREP Objective • …to determine if forest and range policies and practices in BC are achieving government’s objectives for FRPA resource values...

  4. How are we going to achieve our objective? • Determine status, trends and causal factors • Look at innovative strategies and results and default practices • Recommend options for change

  5. Resource Stewardship Monitoring(routine/extensive level-monitoring) • District or regional-level monitoring of on the ground practices to determine if resource value objectives or strategies are being achieved (e.g., innovative FSP and default FRPA ). • Immediate feedback to DDM • Looking for red flag • Local continuous improvement

  6. Intensive level-monitoring/evaluations • Provincial or regional-level monitoring/evaluations of on the ground practices to determine if resource value objectives or strategies are being achieved. • Investigating “red flags” in detail • Ongoing feedback to JMC, Executive, PAC • Regional/provincial continuous improvement and adaptive management

  7. FRPA Resource Effectiveness and Stewardship Monitoring Program Integration

  8. Closing the continuous improvement loop at the field/regional level Affecting changes to on the ground practices and FSP objectives/strategies: • Conduct routine/extensive monitoring • Communicate results to licensees and District Managers • Identify “red flags” for detailed investigation • Informing professional accountability

  9. Closing the continuous improvement loop at the regional/provincial level Affecting changes to legislation, policy and guidelines: • Conduct intensive evaluations • Communicate results of monitoring and evaluations along with recommendations to decision makers • Weigh social, economic and environmental factors

  10. Closing the continuous improvement loop

  11. Resources • Pressures -- Funding and staff availability • 2003/04 -- $205,000 (MOF, WLAP, FPB) • 2004/05 -- $330,000 (MOF, WLAP, FPB, UBC) • 2005/06 -- $600,000 - $1,000,000 (combined)

  12. Resource Stewardship MonitoringChecklist Status

  13. 2004 Resource Stewardship Monitoring Pilots: • Meeting expectations • Identifying improvements • Moving towards implementation • New pilots

More Related