100 likes | 226 Vues
Ian Miller, a policy forester from the Ministry of Forests, discusses how individuals can voice concerns about Forest Development Plans (FDPs) without site plan approval. He explores potential impacts of these concerns on FDP approvals, the implications of new FDP requirements on timely approvals, and the adequacy of current management tests. Miller also explains the distinctions between amendments and variances in the approval process, including triggers for major amendments. For additional insights and resources, Miller highlights where people can find more information about FDPs and their management.
E N D
Question Period Planning & Forest Development Plans _____________ Ian MillerLegislation and Policy Forester, MOF
Without Site Plan approval, how can someone voice a concern about a plan?How might concerns about a Site Plan affect an FDP approval?
Will the new FDP requirements impact the MoF’s ability to ensure recently submitted FDPs can be approved in a timely manner?
Without the same level of detail in the FDP, will DM’s be able to approve FDP’s using the current “adequately manage and conserve” test?
Do you perceive any differences in the role of professionals with respect to planning? Could you provide some examples?
Could you explain the difference between an amendment and a variance and outline the process for getting each of these?
What change in the size of a cutblock will trigger a major amendment? Can you provide an example?
Any other important information related to FDP’s that you feel people should know?
End of Question Period Planning & Forest Development Plans withIan Miller