1 / 33

Enhancing 802.11 Wireless Networks with Directional Antenna and Multiple Receivers

Enhancing 802.11 Wireless Networks with Directional Antenna and Multiple Receivers. Chenxi Zhu, Fujitsu Laboratories of America Tamer Nadeem, Siemens Corporate Research Jonathan Agre, Fujitsu Laboratories of America. Introduction.

liliha
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing 802.11 Wireless Networks with Directional Antenna and Multiple Receivers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Enhancing 802.11 Wireless Networks with Directional Antenna and Multiple Receivers Chenxi Zhu, Fujitsu Laboratories of America Tamer Nadeem, Siemens Corporate Research Jonathan Agre, Fujitsu Laboratories of America

  2. Introduction • IEEE 802.11 WLANs have enjoyed tremendous popularity in recent years. • RTS/CTS/DATA/ACK packets assume omni-directionality

  3. Introduction (cont’d) • Channel reservation is made through carrier sensing • All neighbors of source and destination nodes need to be silent. • Limited number of channels and unlicensed spectrum usage Interference between transmissions is becoming a serious problem.

  4. Spatial Fairness of 802.11 • Different nodes have different neighbors •  experience different contention environments. • Nodes at the overlapping coverage area of the WLANs suffer from lower throughput Extend Bianchi’s discrete time Markov model to understand Spatial Fairness

  5. Spatial Fairness of 802.11 • Extend Bianchi’s discrete time Markov model to some simple multihop networks. • Contention probability  • conditional collision probability pc • Beyond a single hop  different nodes are attached to different ’spatial channels’  no longer share the same notion of discrete time. Need to revisit Bianchi’s discrete time model

  6. Assumptions • The carrier sensing range is the same as the communication range; • RTS/CTS messages are always used • A collision (duration of RTS/CTS) takes the same amount of time as an idle slot. DATA/ACK are free of collisions • Duration of the RTS/CTS/DATA/ACK four way handshake is a geometric random variable with average of 1/ptslots, where ptis the probability that a data transmission terminates in a slot; • Every node always has a packet to send to one of its neighbors.

  7. Markov Model

  8. Markov Model • The state (SA, SC, SB) represents the status of the nodes in group A,C,B in a slot, where • The Markov chain has 5 states: (0; 0; 0), (1; 0; 0), (1; 0; 1), (0; 0; 1), (0; 1; 0).

  9. Markov Model • Transitional Probabilities: • Diagonal terms:

  10. Markov Model • Stationary State Probabilities: ps(0; 0; 0), ps(1; 0; 1), ps(0; 1; 0), and ps(1; 0; 0) = ps(0; 0; 1) • Collision probabilities of the nodes in groups A,B and group C • Contention probabilities 1; 2 of nodes in areas A/B and C

  11. Fairness Analysis (NA=Nc=NB=20) • Throughput vs. Packet size • Stationary Probabilities

  12. Fairness Analysis (NA=Nc=NB=20) • Node Contention/Collision • PaA= p*s(0; 0; 0) + p*s (0; 0; 1)PaC= p*s(0; 0; 0)

  13. Use of Directional Antenna • Directional antenna is a well known method to reduce the interference and to increase the range and the capacity for wireless networks. • Fairness relieved through interference reduction S-MAC

  14. S-MAC: Sectorized Antenna • Dedicated Rx per sector/antenna • Tx can switch to different antennas • Self-interference cancellation between Tx and Rx in different sectors • Consistent channel information at different nodes • No hidden nodes or deafness problem Addresses the hidden node problem and the deafness problem by continuously monitoring the channel in all directions (sectors) at all time

  15. S-MAC Architecture Directional Antennas Separate queues RX RF … DUX RX3 RX DUX RX2 S-MAC: SNAV=[NAVTX1,NAVTX2, NAVRX1, NAVRX2, NAVRX3] RX1 DUX TX symbol for self-interference cancellation TX RF TX2 switching fabric TX1 TX RF Base Band MAC and higher

  16. Self-interference Cancellation Scheme • Different TX and RX modules are all part of the same PHY • on-chip communication between them is possible. • When TXi transmits signal Sti, RXj receives Sri. ; • RXj cancels the interference caused by own TXi • RXj can then decode signal from another node k • This requires self-channel estimation from own i to j: Gij: Srik. = Sri - Gij* Sti.

  17. Sectorized NAV and Carrier Sensing • SNAV=[NAVTX1, NAVTX2, NAV1, NAV2, …, NAVM]. • NAVTXi: status of TXi (busy period). • Updated when S-MAC node is involved in a transmission using TXi • NAVj: status of medium in sector j. • Updated when S-MAC node senses a change of medium status in sector j (sending or receiving RTS/CTS/DATA). • Fully interoperable with regular omni 802.11 nodes.

  18. D H A RTS CTS G B F E RTS Collision Operation of S-MAC (example I) DMAC “Hidden Node due to asymmetric gain” C Example adopted from R. Choudhury, X. Yang, R. Ramanathan, and NH Vaidy, MobiCom 2002.

  19. D H A RTS CTS G B F E CTS from F rcvd RTS not sent by A C Operation of S-MAC (example I) SMAC: “Hidden Node due to asymmetric gain” avoidance Example adopted from R. Choudhury, X. Yang, R. Ramanathan, and NH Vaidy, MobiCom 2002.

  20. D H A RTS CTS G B F E E waits for B-F to finish C Operation of S-MAC (example II) “Hidden Node due to unheard RTS/CTS” avoidance Example adopted from R. Choudhury, X. Yang, R. Ramanathan, and NH Vaidy, MobiCom 2002.

  21. D H A G B F E E is aware C is Transmitting C Operation of S-MAC (example II) Deafness Prevention Example adopted from R. Choudhury, X. Yang, R. Ramanathan, and NH Vaidy, MobiCom 2002.

  22. Markov Model for S-MAC • The state (SA, SC1, SC2, SB) represents the status of the nodes in group A,C,B in a slot, where • SA + SC1 <= 1, SB + SC2 <= 1, SC1 + SC2 <= 1 • The Markov chain has 8 states: (0,0,0,0), (0,0,0,1), (0,0,1,0), (0,1,0,0), (0,1,0,1), (1,0,0,0), (1,0,0,1), (1,0,1,0).

  23. Fairness Analysis (NA=NB=20, Nc1=Nc2=10) • Throughput vs. Packet size • Stationary Probabilities

  24. Fairness Analysis (NA=NB=20, Nc1=Nc2=10) • Node Contention/Collision • PaAd= ps(0,0,0,0) + ps(0,0,0,1) +ps(0,0,1,0)PaCd= ps(0,0,0,0) + ps(0,0,0,1)

  25. Performance Evaluation • NS-2 simulator is used. • 802.11b with transmission rate 11 Mbps. • Transmission range of 250m and carrier sensing range is 550m. • All nodes are stationary. • UDP traffics packets with average packet size 1000 bytes. • Four way handshake (RTS/CTS/DATA/ACK) is used. • Simulated duration of 50 seconds and each point is averaged from 5 independent runs.

  26. Simulation Scenarios • Network of 2x2 grid of overlapping • Each AP has and 40 clients that are distributed uniformly in its coverage area. • Infrastructure mode is used. • APs are upgraded with S-MAC of 4 sectors (1 Tx & 4 Rx). • All STAs still use omni directional antenna (regular 802.11 MAC).

  27. Simulation Results • Improvement arises from reduced interference with sector antennas and reduced collision from the S-MAC protocol. • Total throughput does not change significantly as the number of sectors increases from 2 to 4. • No significant change was found with different antenna orientations.

  28. Conclusion • S-MAC takes full advantage of directional antenna: • Avoids hidden node problem and deafness. • Multiple sectors can be used simultaneously. • Fully compatible with regular omni-antenna client nodes. • Easy to upgrade existing 802.11 networks with enhanced access. • Increase the network capacity with minimal cost. • Extendable to utilize smart antenna systems

  29. Ideas • For ad hoc networks: • Study effect of x% of nodes are S-MAC. • Study the effect of location of S-MAC node  find the optimum set of S-MAC nodes for best performance • For Infrastructure: • Best Carrier Sense Threshold for optimal performance • Mobility?

  30. BACKUP SLIDES

  31. Directional Antenna and DMAC (I) N2 N3 N1 • Conflict between increased spatial reuse (higher capacity) and increased collision (higher MAC overhead) • Collision caused by directional antenna • Hidden nodes due to asymmetry omni/directional gain • Hidden nodes due to unheard RTS or CTS packets • Deafness

  32. Directional Antenna and DMAC (II) N4 N1 N2 N3 • Conflict between increased spatial reuse (higher capacity) and increased collisions (higher MAC overhead) • Collisions caused by directional antenna • Hidden nodes due to asymmetry omni/directional gain • Hidden nodes due to unheard RTS or CTS packets • Deafness

  33. MAC Assisted Self-calibration • Self-calibration: • Estimate the channel from antenna i to antenna k, both of the same S-MAC node. • Applicable to all PHY (a/b/g). • Procedures • Step 1: send RTS in every sector to silence all neighbor nodes, so the SYNC sent next will not collide with other packets. • Step 2: send regular training symbols (SYNC) in every sector. • As SYNC is sent from antenna i, antenna k estimate the channel Gik. • Gik and Gki can be averaged: Gki= Gik:=(Gki+ Gik)/2.

More Related