1 / 11

Assessing Democratic Politics in Ukraine

Assessing Democratic Politics in Ukraine. US-UA Working Group Yearly Summit I: Providing Ukraine with Annual Report Card June 20, 2013 Washington DC Iryna Bekeshkina. Parliamentary election-2012 in Ukraine was a step backwards in democratic development. Election assessment -2.5

lillian-kerr
Télécharger la présentation

Assessing Democratic Politics in Ukraine

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessing Democratic Politics in Ukraine US-UA Working Group Yearly Summit I: Providing Ukraine with Annual Report Card June 20, 2013 Washington DC Iryna Bekeshkina

  2. Parliamentary election-2012 in Ukraine was a step backwards in democratic development Election assessment -2.5 • Free, competitive, but unfair; • Rather just in the proportional segment; • Brutally falsified in the majoritarian part

  3. Negative trends in elections-2012 • Change of electoral legislation on the eve on the election in the interest of the ruling party • Dominance of the ruling party representatives in electoral commissions • Unequal conditions for electoral campaign conduction for different parties and candidates • Unequal access to mass media • Voters’ bribery • Falsification of votes in the single-mandate districts • Involvement of state institutions – militia and courts – in electoral fraud • Absence of punishment for those involved in electoral fraud • Elections in 5 problematic single mandate districts have not been settled yet

  4. But not only bad news Positive trends • Increase of opposition support; • Consolidation of opposition forces; • Activation of the civil society; • Voters proved that money is not enough; • Readiness of citizens to defend their votes; • Obvious desire of the citizens for a different kind of politics and politicians

  5. Respect for human rights assessment -2.0 • Political repressions of opposition • Establishment of authoritarian hierarchy of power: degradation of parliament • Total subordination of judiciary to executive • Endemic and systematic nature of corruption • Suppression of business, raider acquisition of property • Limitation of electoral competition • Curtailment of rights on protest actions BUT • Lutsenko was released

  6. Free Media Assessment – 2.50 • Economic insufficiency of media • Pressure by media owners • Censorship • Journalists self-censorship • Media using as a tool of manipulation • Closing of 2 ear TV-programmes • Raider acquisition of TVi-channel BUT Activation of journalists NGO protecting rights of journalists (“Hence censorship!”)

  7. Strong civil society assessment – 4.0 • Activation of civil society organizations • Creations of NGOs associations (“Chesno!”, “For fair referendums”, Public Sociological Consortium etc.) • Expanding of non-political protests • Increasing people confidence to civil organizations • Some NGO’s leaders were elected to the parliament • NGOs sometimes were successful in the pressure on politicians and government

  8. NGO Successful actions According to the public opinion poll, 67% voters considered personal voting an important criteria of assessment of a given deputy. Only 22% dismissed this as an unimportant criteria. “Batkivshchyna”, “UDAR” and “Svoboda” parties signed agreements with “Chesno” civic movement on personal voting in the future Verkhovna Rada.

  9. NGO Successful actions Relative majority of population – 45% ( 52% among the target group) – expressed negative attitude towards proposition to introduce entrance exams in addition to the present system of external independent evaluation during the admission campaign. 27% would have favored such change. Common efforts of NGOs, experts, and deputies allowed to prevent adoption of a bill on higher education developed by the Ministry of education which would have downgraded the role of external independent evaluation and created favorable conditions for proliferation of corruption in universities. Visibility of public opinion poll results played a major role in this success.

  10. Total assessment of Democracy progress scale – 2.5

  11. Ukraine at the crossroads:democracy or authoritarianism, the East or the West Choice-1 Parliamentary majority formation by pressing and bribing; Repressions against opposition and civic leaders; Limitation of human rights and freedoms; Selective justice, disregarding the rule of law; Construction of the Russian model of managed democracy; Transformation of corruption as a bottom-up model; Break-off the relations with the West and entering Custom Union with Russia 2015: Victor Yanukovych will be a winner of the unfair elections Choice-2 • Fair re-elections in the problematic districts, punishments of all involved in the electoral violations; • Redressing cases of selective justice and reforming of the judiciary; • Stopping the limitation of human rights and freedoms, especially freedom of media; • Real fighting corruption; • Signing the Association Agreement at Vilnus Summit • 2015: Who will win at the fair presidential elections?

More Related