1 / 39

IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems. Agenda. Information business challenges Information Life Cycle Management DR550 product Retention policies Architecture and solutions Differentiators Whats new Resources Competition Review questions.

lindley
Télécharger la présentation

IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IBM System Storage Archive and DataRetention Systems

  2. Agenda • Information business challenges • Information Life Cycle Management • DR550 product • Retention policies • Architecture and solutions • Differentiators • Whats new • Resources • Competition • Review questions

  3. Invoices, Financial and Tax Statements SAP SAP Exchange Notes SAP Orders, Confirmations Instant messages, e-mail Wireless & PDA @ Business Content Create Search Store Manage Distribute Retain Customer/ Supplier Records Kiosk Business Content Portal / Browser Customer Correspondence, Reports Photos, Videos, Audio (Phone Conversations) Call Center Web Content Do you have this kind of information?

  4. Do You Have Any of These Business Challenges? Inadvertent deletion / modification of information is a leading cause of non-compliance Health care represents major challenges in data growth and compliance Rapidly growing storage requirements causing costs to spiral out of control More and more information is being kept “Just In Case” Customers Good business practices dictating long-term retention of data Employees Trx. 85% of information is unstructured. Partners Orgs. Products Financials 30% of people’s time is spent searching for relevant information. 42% of transactions are still paper-based. Web Content e-Mails Databases Up to 40% of IT budgets spent on integration “Missing Email May Cost Morgan Stanley 10M$” Media Reports Documents Sarbanes-Oxley and SEC regulations dictating information retention 79% of companies: have 2 + repositories… 25%: have 15 + The average billion dollar company: 48 disparate financial systems 2.7 ERP systems Sources: IBM & Industry Studies, Customer Interviews

  5. Archiving a Big Client Pain, Big Growth Opportunity and an Easy Opportunity to Identify Digital Asset Management Document Imaging Output / Report Management Document Management Digital Rights Management Records Management Archiving Archiving Web Content Management

  6. Just-In Case Information Data becomes “Just In Case” Fast/High Life InsurancePolicy Payoff MortgageLoan Payoff Accessibility – Speed/Frequency Legal DiscoveryRequest RegulatoryRequest StorageMigration StorageMigration StorageMigration Slow/Low Active 1 Day 100+ Years 1 Month 5 Years 20 Years 50 Years 1 Hour Semi-active Time – Record Life Cycle Source: Cohasset Associates, Inc.

  7. What is Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) The process of managing business data throughout its lifecycle from conception until disposal in a manner that optimizes storage and access at the lowest cost

  8. The IBM System Storage DR550 • A purpose built, information archive for long term data retention and protection • Policy-based, non-erasable, non-rewriteable disk storage • Industry leading IBM advanced technology • Automatic policy-based tiered storage management • Data encryption – In flight and at rest • IBM dual processor Power5 technology for high performance (benchmarked at over 3x competition) • IBM SATA disk technology for low cost • Enablement of secondary storage, i.e. WORM Tape (optional) supporting very low TCO • Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Monitoring – proactive system problem prevention and correction • High speed 10/100/1000 Ethernet connectivity • Disaster recovery options with synchronous and asynchronous replication • Deemed compliant with SEC 17a-4 by independent consultants

  9. IBM Information Infrastructure for Information ComplianceIBM System Storage™ DR550 V4.6 33% more disk capacity • Client value • Improves performance in large environments, due to larger disks • Reduces TCO and power consumption up to 50% with blended disk and tape option, compared to all-disk configurations • Reasons to buy: • New 1TB drives adds 33% more disk capacity than previous drives • IPv6 support on single node configurations expands network address space to 128 bits and eliminates the network address translation (NAT) role Information Compliance DR550 Model DR1 DR550 Model DR2 http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr

  10. IBM System Storage DR550 Family • DR550 • Ranges from 5.6 to 89.6 TB of raw disk storage capacity • Single or dual server options • Choice of Ethernet connections • Synchronous or asynchronous replication options • Tape ready • Optional TS1120 or LTO-3 WORM IBM DR550 • DR550 Express • Ranges from 1.1 to 6.7 TB raw disk storage capacity • Choice of Ethernet connections • Optional 25U rack with lockable doors • Tape ready • Optional TS1120 or LTO-3 WORM IBM DR550 Express

  11. IBM DR550 IBM TS3500 IBM DR550 Express Add Tape for Complete Archive Solution • Add tape to provide: • Backup for the DR550 operational files • Migration path for DR550 controlled data to lower cost storage • Lower overall TCO • DR550 scalability to petabytes • Unique differentiation versus competition DR550 tiered storage with IBM System Storage TS1120 Enterprise tape system and/or other attached WORM tape media such as LTO Ultrium Generation 3 WORM Tape drives and IBM WORM tape libraries Attached tape example

  12. DR550 Retention Policies • Default and custom policies • Expire based on a predetermined expiration date • Expire based on a retention event • Expire on demand • Stored indefinitely • Use a deletion hold and release • Holds data for an indefinite period of time, regardless of the expiration date or defined event • Used for audits and legal events

  13. Replication Options E-mail, images, documents and other object and files that need retaining IBM DR550 Dual writes by application Metro or Global Mirror Application with Retention Policy IBM DR550 IBM DR550

  14. DB2 SQL Server DR550 Solution Architecture Examples • Three critical components required to build a “Retention Managed Data” solution • Business application • Content management application • Retention device – policy based non-erasable non-rewritable Business application Content management application Retention device Document files E-mail IBM DB2 Content Manager Optim 6.2 Enterprise Vault IBM DB2 CommonStore … and others IBM System Storage DR550

  15. Where can the DR550 help? • The DR550 solution can help with the following: • Solve problems of archiving E-mail archive, Instant messages, voice mails, etc. with policy-based tiered storage • Archive inactive tables/rows of CRM/ERP databases (e.g. PeopleSoft, Siebel, UDB, Oracle Financials, SAP, etc.) • Replace aging optical storage (for example IBM 3995 Jukebox) • Images (any kind of digital media), engineering drawings, contracts, any corporate asset worth protecting, even college transcripts • Corporate retention policies • Sarbanes-Oxley retention requirements • SEC retention requirements • Other legal or regulatory requirements – can help to protect records from policy-based deletion during legal or other inquiries

  16. DR550 Information Retention Solutions • Examples of DR550 solutions include many IBM and non-IBM solutions: • Retention: DR550 + IBM Content Manager • Exchange Archiving: DR550 + IBM Content Manager + IBM CommonStore Exchange • Exchange Archiving: DR550 + Symantec Enterprise Vault • Exchange Archiving: DR550 + Zantaz EAS • Domino Archiving: DR550 + IBM Content Manager + IBM CommonStore Domino • Domino Archiving: DR550 + Zantaz EAS • SAP Archiving: DR550 + IBM Content Manager + IBM CommonStore SAP • SAP Archiving: DR550 + EasySoftware Easy Enterprise x • Optical Replacement: DR550 + IBM Content Manager for iSeries + MBS Technologies StorageView Connector for CM/i • Database Archiving (Oracle, DB2, PeopleSoft, Siebel): DR550 + Princeton Softech Optim • Image Archiving: DR550 + FileNet Image Manager • NFS/CIFS/FTP Gateway: DR550 + Triade TriFSG Gateway

  17. Application Support for IBM DR550 • AXS-One • BrainTribe (Formerly Comprendium) • CaminoSoft • Ceyoniq • D.velop AG • Easy Software • Heilig & Schubert (H&S) • FileNet • Hummingbird • Hyland Software (OnBase) • Hyperwave • IRIS Software (Documentum Connector) • MBS Technologies • (iSeries Connector for IBM CM V5) • OpenText (formerly IXOS) • Princeton Softech Optim 6.2 • for PeopleSoft; Siebel; Oracle • Saperion • SER Solutions • TRIADE (NFS/CIFS/FTP Gateway) • Veritas Enterprise Vault (formerly KVS) • Waters (Creon Labs, NuGenesis) • Windream • Zantaz • IBM DB2 CM for Multiplatforms • IBM DB2 CM for zOS • IBM DB2 CM On Demand for Multiplatforms • IBM DB2 CM On Demand for zOS • IBM CommonStore for Exchange Server • IBM CommonStore for Lotus Domino • IBM CommonStore for SAP • IBM CM for Message Monitoring and Retention • With iLumin • BRMS iOS (also via IFS to BRMS)

  18. Key DR550 Differentiators • Event-based retention management • Policy-based automatic expiration/deletion of data • Policy-based reuse of storage • Tiered storage management to multiple tiers of less expensive storage – Can significantly reduce TCO using disk & WORM tape combination • Off-site (vault) protection of the data • Media Migration – When replacing old media with new • Data Encryption – for enhanced security • Very High Performance with IBM Power5 technology • Very Competitive Price on base models • Integration of different technologies with our storage pool hierarchy • Access and authentication control • Enterprise class availability, reliability, scalability

  19. Competition

  20. Strengths of EMC Centera • Allows Single Instance Storage • One and the same object is stored only once • In-band data deduplication • Scalable based on RAIN Architecture • Storage is added via storage nodes (disk only) • Performance scales with access nodes (Ethernet connectivity) • Supports Active-Active Mirroring relation between nodes • Includes Outboard Search capabilities in Centera • Allows to search for Content • Established and recognized Product in the market • Many customer references available, many ISV support EMC Centera API • CAS architecture is a marketing advantage • Content Address can be used to validate content authenticy • Clever idea, but not required by regulations *Based on preliminary findings of internal IBM projections.

  21. Weakness of EMC Centera • Does not offer Tiered Storage or alterative storage technologies • Higher TCO, especially for longer term archiving • Less flexibility for migration to other storage technologies • Data protection only through additional disk • Content Mirroring is not synchronous • No backup of data to less expensive storage media • Sticky Technology • Replacement of MD-5 hash requires application to read all data • Known Performance Issues • According to non-disclosed sources and ISVs • Partially caused by RAIN Architecture (CAS and Centera Network) • No data encryption included *Based on preliminary findings of internal IBM projections.

  22. Key Strengths for IBM DR550 • DR550 allows for lower Total Cost of Ownership for long retention times • DR550 supports true tiered storage (disk, optical, tape) • With removable media storage DR550 is more energy-efficient • With Centera data is kept on disk for long archival period, less energy efficient • DR550 includes Data Migration Functions • Centera is disk centric, migration just from disk to disk • DR550 is not a sticky Technology • DR550 leverages industry-leading technology such as TSM • Centeras’ CAS implementation is sticky • DR550 provides flexible options for Data Protection • DR550 provides synchronous mirroring or backup to tape • Centera requires disk and even more disk • DR550 has leading Archival – Retrieval Performance • Get real numbers from EMC Centera and compare it to DR550 • DR550 includes Data Encryption Techniques • On disk via API encryption, On tape via Tape encryption

  23. Performance Comparison DR550 Testing • 5 Zantaz EAS servers archiving 4 Exchange Server • 2 x 1-Gbit Ethernet Interfaces • DR550 with 7 TB single node NetApp and EMC Centera Testing • 8 Enterprise Vault Servers archiving 8 Exchange Servers • 4 x 1-Gbit Ethernet Interfaces • NetApp FAS3050 and R200 • EMC Centera G4 with 4 Access Nodes and 12 Storage Nodes using CPM ESG Lab Review™, May 2007 http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/pdf/esg_lab_review03072007.pdf Source: Test Report from Veritest, July 2006 “Network Appliance™ FAS3050, R200, and EMC Centera G4 Performance Comparison”

  24. Single Instance Storage • Where is single instance storage really efficient and required? • When data objects are identical • Suited for E-mail archiving (especially attachments) • Most e-mail archiving systems however include single instance storage • IBM CommonStore, Zantaz, Symantec EV • Therefore, DR550 does not need it. • Means less overhead with DR550 and more performance • Other Arguments to discuss: • MD-5 which is not longer unambiguous • What happens an object is not stored due to a faulty algorithm • Single Instance Storage cuts back I/O performance • See Centera Performance

  25. Where to go for more information • IBM DR550 Sales Kit: • IBM Sales Teams: http://w3-1.ibm.com/sales/systems/portal/_s.155/254?navID=f220s240&geoID=AM&prodID=Disk&docID=dataretentcomplsk.skit&docType=SalesKit&skCat=DocumentType • Business Partner Sales Teams: http://w3-1.ibm.com/sales/systems/portal/_s.155/254?navID=f220s240&geoID=All&prodID=IBM%20eServer%20And%20TotalStorage%20Products&docID=dataretentcomplsk.skit&docType=SalesKit&skCat=DocumentType_moreinfo • IBM System Storage Data Retention External web site • http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/storage/disk/dr/index.html • IBM External Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) web site • http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/solutions/ilm/ • IBM WORM Tape offering – External Web Site • http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/tape/3592/index.html • IBM System Storage Archive Manager • http://www-306.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/storage-mgr-data-reten/ • IBM System Storage Archive Manager – Supported Devices • http://www-3.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBM_TSM_Supported_Devices_for_AIXHPSUNWIN.html/ • IBM System Storage Archive Manager developer site • http://www.developer.ibm.com/tivoli/about_tsmdr.html • Searchstorage.com Articles: • June, 2004 - EMC dodges question on Centera Performance • February, 2005 - EMC Centera Scalability Hampers Large e-mail Archives • December, 2005 - Hospital ditches EMC Centera for long-term archiving • Byte and Switch Article: • January, 2006 - The CAS Conundrum • DR550 • Spec sheets • Redbook • White Papers • Manuals • All DR550 components • Spec sheets • Redbooks

  26. Review questions • The DR550 has what major competitive features? • Performance, retention policies, and tape attachment • Energy conservation, SAS drives, and 8 gb/s FC connection • Performance, massive capacity, and iSCSI attachmnt • Optical migration, SAS attachment, and perfromance • The major competitor of the DR550 is? • EMC Centura • HP Virtual Archive • SunFire 25000 • VMWare • The DR550 is a key part of a tiered data retention solution. What are the other parts? • Power Systems and TS3500 • Key enterprise application and a policy making application • Information Life Cycle Management and Business Continuity • DB2 CommonStore and Microsoft Virtual Server • The major applications for the DR550 are • High speed transaction applications and business intelligence • CRM,SCM, and ERP • Spinning archive and compliance • Insurance and distribution

  27. Additional Information

  28. Add IGS services to the solution… • Implementation Services for the IBM System Storage DR550 • Implementation Services for Mirroring via System Storage DS4000 Family Enhanced Remote Mirror Services • RAID Conversion Services for the IBM System Storage DR550 • MES Services via an Equipment Modification Contract for Hardware • Offerings that include implementation services, onsite software/firmware upgrades, and three-year maintenance upgrades • Advisory services • Legacy transformation services • Custom application services • Business risk and compliance • Strategy and change • Vertical expertise • Data Classification • IT infrastructure services • Performance & availability • Tiered storage deployment

  29. References • Large UK Bank – IBM Content Manager on Demand • Depository Trust – IBM Content Manager • Porsche (Automotive) – Ceyoniq • IBM Customer Support Organization – IBM Content Manager • Hudson Valley Credit Union – Hyland • Boehringer (Pharmaceutical) – Documentum • Large US-based Financial Services Company – IBM Content Mgr • Large Semi-conductor company – IBM CommonStore for SAP • Leading Logistics provider – d.velop document mgmt software

  30. Centera does not allow deletions or modifications (Object based) Centera API EMC Centera Overview Source: “A Centera Whitepaper: Understanding and Addressing the Challenges of Compliance and Discovery” by EMC Corp.

  31. Data Migration • Who knows which storage technology is “most appropriate” in the future? • Holographic Storage and solid state disk is just “around the corner” • Storing data on disk for long periods might become really expensive • Long term archiving requires to migrate data to other storage devices and –technologies in the future • As well as migration of client, DMS and other infrastructure • With EMC Centera customers are bound on disk • Migration to other technologies becomes more complicated and might not be transparent to the application • DR550 has Data migration capabilities built-in • New storage technologies are supported by SSAM • Data Migration is transparent to application

  32. Links: DR550 vs. Centera • DR550 Home Page http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/index.html • DR550 Performance Measurement Report: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/performance.html • DR550 Performance Whitepaper from ESG Lab Review™ http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/pdf/esg_lab_review03072007.pdf • Veritest Report about NetApp and Centera Performance http://www.netapp.com/news/press/news_rel_20060912a http://www.lionbridge.com/competitive_analysis/reports/netapp/NetApp_FAS3050-R200_EMC_Centera_Report.pdf • TCO Study from RFG comparing cost of disk and tape: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/pdf/RFG_Paper.pdf • TCO study from DMG “Is tape really cheaper than disk?” http://www.lto.org/News/paper-form.php • CAS Condrum Article at ByteAndSwitch http://www.byteandswitch.com/document.asp?doc_id=87375 • EMC Centera Home Page http://www.emc.com/products/family/emc-centera-family.htm • Holographic Storage http://www.inphase-technologies.com/products/default.asp?tnn=3

  33. DR550 Competitive Attack Points

  34. Performance • Prior Centera Performance: • In 2002 Centera achieved a rate of 18,450 per hour for archiving • about 5 objects per second • Newest EMC Centera Performance results: • 16-node Centera system archived upwards of 240,000 e-mails per hour • About 67 e-mails per second • Average size of e-mail is assumed at 10 – 100 KB • Veritas Enterprise Vault was used as DMS • DR550 does 111 Object per second with 10 Objects (64K) per transactions • Multi-object transaction with 500 Objects per transaction achieves about 170 Objects (128 K) and 833 Objects (8K) per second

  35. IBM Confidential Performance Comparison EMC Centera1 IBM DR550 V 1.5 1 EMC internal numbers (undisclosed sources) * Multi-object Transaction Detailed DR550 Performance Report: http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/disk/dr/performance.html

  36. 300 MB/Minute = 5 MB/sec !!! (with 4 channels) Performance of Competition • Single node FAS3050 was 38% faster than 16-node Centera (4:12) • R200 was 45% faster • Single disk drive failure: • FAS3050 was 80% faster • R200 was 74%faster • 4 x 1 Gbit Ethernet Channel has been used for all systems Source: Test Report from Veritest, July 2006 “Network Appliance™ FAS3050, R200, and EMC Centera G4 Performance Comparison”

  37. New Technology – holographic storage • Next Generation optical storage • Faster: read and write matrices of bits • Traditional optical reads and writes serial. • More Capacity: more than 200 GB initially • Blue-Ray / UDO targets 100 GB (+) How will EMC Centera handle this in the future? Press Release (Heise, 19.4.2005 Inphase Technology plans to release a 300-Gigabyte-Laufwerk with a transfer rate of 160 MByte/s to the market in the next year. In a next generation 1,6 TByte Kapazität and 960 MByte/s shall be archieved….

  38. EMC Centera on zOS • Here are some limitation I see with this solution • Not a one-hand solution: 3490 or 3995 emulator from third (either bustech - 3490 or interkom - 3995). • No retention management with this solution, because the leading application on zOS such as CM or CMoD does not send the retention time for an object. • Leading application is device dependent, thus future migrations to other device have to be performed through the leading application. • No hierarchical storage management. Thus the data will always be on disk. This causes much higher TCO. • zOS is IBM-World, thus the integration between hardware and software is much better with an IBM DR550. • 3490 and 3995 architecture is fairly old. 3490 or 3995 Emulator Centera zSeries CM OAM LAN Escon / Ficon

  39. EMC Centera and TSM • TSM and SSAM support EMC Centera as storage device • There are many limitation making it impossible to migrated data from or to Centera: • No Migration. • No Reclamation. • No Move data into or out of a Centera storage pool. • No Moving node data into or out of a Centera storage pool. • No Storage pool backup of Centera storage pools. • No Restore volume of Centera storage pool volumes. • No Exporting data to a Centera device class or importing data from a Centera device class • No Using a Centera device class for creating backup sets; however, files stored in Centera storage pools can be sent to backup sets. • No Defining Centera volumes. • No Using a Centera device class to back up a database. • No Using a Centera device class for database loading or unloading. • No Using a Centera device class as the target of volume history, device configuration, trace logs, error logs, or query output files.

More Related