1 / 10

Workshop #1 report Digital repository management

Workshop #1 report Digital repository management. Ramon Ros rros@cbuc.es ELAG 2008 Wageningen. Topics discussed. Preservation Growth of repository (policies). Software/infrastructure Persistent URLs Branding Economic sustainibility of the repository. Preservation 1/2.

lindley
Télécharger la présentation

Workshop #1 report Digital repository management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop #1 reportDigital repository management Ramon Ros rros@cbuc.es ELAG 2008 Wageningen

  2. Topics discussed • Preservation • Growth of repository (policies). • Software/infrastructure • Persistent URLs • Branding • Economic sustainibility of the repository

  3. Preservation 1/2 • Importance of new standard PDF/A, PDF/? • Separate operations: • “Production” -> repository • Long term preservation • Need to select stuff. “Everything” seems impossible. (ex: Facebook)

  4. Preservation 2/2 Group recommendations: • Gather metadata (and technical metadata). • Avoid “exotic” formats • Use open solutions • Someone have to think about it

  5. Growth of repository • You need to reach the critical mass, then everything goes smoothly. • Ideas: • Cream of Science in the Netherlands • Make it part of your internal workflow • Must be easy for the researcher • Small awards (economic or not)

  6. Software/infrastructure • Still some home made applications • Dspace used in 2 institutions • Fedora will be in use in other 2 institutions • It seems that some institutions could reconsider Fedora in some time. • It could be used for preservation also.

  7. Persistent URLs • Some countries have developed their own “easy” URN but based on standard. • You may use DOI but there are costs. Recomendation: It doesn´t matter which system you use, but use one.

  8. Economic sustainibility • General idea: it is a basic infrastructure, so it has some costs. • It should be not just a project. Its here to stay.

  9. Branding • Maybe the repositories should only be data providers. • Most access is done via Google. • Mark the document itself (logo, watermark, etc.) • Its a managers concern. Authors want to go to international repositories

  10. Any question?

More Related