Northeast Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Pilot Project Introduction October 2013

1. Northeast Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management Pilot Project Introduction October 2013

2. Proposed Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Overview of CEAM 3. This year’s operational trial 4. Discussion

3. Project Overview: Key Drivers • To assess potential cumulative impacts to natural resource values • To improve our ability to determine if we are adequately managing to meet provincial government objectives • To provide increased certainty and stability

4. Project Overview What is the problem we are trying to solve? How are we attempting to solve it? What will success look like?

5. The Problem Considering only project or sector- specific effects allows unintended impacts to accumulate over time

6. The Solution: A Values Based Approach Assess Cumulative Effects – risk to values Manage Cumulative Effects – consistency, coordination Time

7. Defining Success: Key Shifts Single sector Multi-sector coordinated, area-based Project-focused Values-focused Reactive Proactive, focused on desired outcomes

8. Defining Success: Key Outcomes • Consistency across sectors • Mobilizing force for implementing integrated decision-making • Improved information up-front for proponents • Streamlined authorization / referral process • More proactive, catch issues earlier • Substantially address First Nations and Community CE concerns

9. Context Demonstration Projects: Northeast, Northwest, Okanagan Working towards a consistent Provincial Approach

10. Demonstration Area Dawson Creek LRMP Area

11. Pilot Project Last year: Designed the process Developed internal government structures This year: Test and then evaluate Next year: Subject to the outcomes of the evaluation and approval, expand implementation across Northeast region

12. Proposed Process

13. Values Foundation • Select Broad Values – others are nested within • Two types: • Resource values • Socio-economic values • Need: • Manageable number • Ability to measure – legal/policy objective • Existing data

14. Values Resource Values Socio-Economic Values Job creation and retention Revenue to governments Private sector investment • Water quantity • Caribou • Old growth forests • Riparian habitat • Priority wildlife habitat • Cultural heritage features Future • Water quality • Air quality

15. Operational Trial Milestones

16. Opportunities for Collaboration • Based on work-to-date: • Data for values – existing and through future monitoring • Trends information • Near-term (3-5 years) • Anticipated pace of change • By watershed • Discussion on other possibilities

17. Questions

18. Cumulative Effects - Defined “Changes to environmental, social, and economic values caused by the combined effect of present, past, and reasonably foreseeable future actions or events on the land base.”

19. What it is and What it isn’t • What It Is • A consistent framework and better information to support integrated NRS decision-making • Open & transparent data • A risk based approach to assessing potential cumulative effects to key values • What it Isn’t • ≠ Land Use Planning • ≠ A tool/formula that makes decisions • ≠Thresholds to automatically limit development