1 / 16

Directors of Children’s Services Event – 6 th July 2007

Directors of Children’s Services Event – 6 th July 2007. Integrated Services for Nottinghamshire. Nottinghamshire County Council. Agenda:. Context Aims Methodology Findings The model From virtual to actual. Context - how did we get to where we are?.

lisle
Télécharger la présentation

Directors of Children’s Services Event – 6 th July 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Directors of Children’s Services Event – 6th July 2007 IntegratedServices for Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire County Council

  2. Agenda: • Context • Aims • Methodology • Findings • The model • From virtual to actual.

  3. Context - how did we get to where we are? • Nottinghamshire was a pathfinder for Targeted Youth Support (we were an early intervention pathfinder so no age limits) • We used this to develop our vision for tackling complex additional needs through “all-age” targeted support: • Early identification (CAF) • Simple processes (one story, told once) • Effective co-ordination (lead professional) • Safe and accessible settings (locality focus, driven by young people) • Swift and easy referral (extended services agenda).

  4. Aims of integrated services model - what are we trying to achieve? • Improve access to multi-agency services • Enable services to work together better • Establish protocols for early intervention and co-ordination of provision • Improve services through effective participation • Improve quality and quantity of service provision • Complement other initiatives • Provide a “one stop” access model.

  5. What is targeted support? To deliver services to children and young people with tier 2 & 3 needs and supports universal services in early interventions and accesses specialist tier 4 services Specialist services Tier 4 Targeted support for those receiving services Targeted support for those hidden from services Targeted services Tier 2 & 3 Preventative services for under 13s Early intervention and prevention for over 13s Universal services Tier 1

  6. Local Context – how we used Kirkby as our model area. • Geographic target:. Kirkby College Family of Schools • Former coalfield and the related social and economic disadvantage. • Fits with the Annual Performance Assessment in relation to: • emotional health and well being • attainment • attitudes of young men from white, working class backgrounds. • Children and young people target: 0 to 19 years • Specific Issues: Strengthening emotional resilience and promotion of social inclusion.

  7. Characteristics of Kirkby (and many other areas across Nottinghamshire) • Higher than average rates of teenage pregnancy • Higher than average rates of permanent exclusion • Higher than average rates of truancy • Higher than average eligibility and take up for free school meals • Lower than average attainment at Key Stages 3 and 4.

  8. Methodology – how did we do it? Mobilise Discover Deepen Develop Deliver Decision points 1 2 3 Senior management Launch meetings Focused Interviews Senior management briefing Senior management briefing Develop plan with project manager Consolidate findings Service deliveryand users (young people/ families) Focused interviews /Groups Young Person’s journey workshops Service delivery workshops Change teams Pathfinders will deliver benefits quickly June 2006 January 2007

  9. Findings – what were the emerging themes? • Work to strengths and recognise current good practice • Improved communication and shared language • Increase awareness of the network of people who share the same concerns • Find solutions not more problems • Make progress with some quick wins • Find a local model for working which builds trust and encourages sharing • Recognise that this is a continuum.

  10. Criteria/guiding principles for developing the proposed model: • Strong visible presence • Building on current good practice • Driven by need and by children, young people and families • Early identification and translate into appropriate action • 0-19 • Adding value for schools • Optimise the use of skills, knowledge and experience • Promote shared targets • Respect service boundaries but enable seamless service.

  11. The Virtual Team Model Aligned Services Core Services Core Group

  12. The model in detail: • “Wrap around” services with the child/young person at the centre • Based around the family of schools • Operates within service boundaries, maximising skills, knowledge and experience without major structural change • Effective mix of prevention and intervention • Focus on early identification • Driven by a partnership of children, young people, families and practitioners.

  13. The role of the core group: • Hold regular (monthly) meeting of local practitioners from key services/agencies • Accept requests for support from children, young people & services/agencies • Use the Common Assessment Framework (CAF) as an assessment tool • Nominate a Lead Professional to co-ordinate support to child or young person • Make decisions and direct interventions • Be informed by the needs of Children and Young People & be able to influence the direction and deployment of resources in targeted and universal services.

  14. The core group in detail: • Inclusion Support Services • Connexions • CAMHS • Youth Services • Family SENCO • Social Care • Children’s Centre • School Nurse • Parent Participation Officer • Voluntary Sector Membership may change over time and may be different in each locality.

  15. Critical Success Factors: • Universal commitment • Clarity of roles and responsibilities of the Core and Steering Groups • Effective co-ordination of the Core Group • Effective communications • Effective participation of children, young people and families • Effective monitoring and evaluation • Effective participation by the schools.

  16. From virtual to actual • Implementation of the Virtual Team model across the Kirkby Family of Schools. Pilot with effect from 01st April 2007 • Adoption of the Virtual Team model as a means to developing targeted support across Nottinghamshire • Integrate the pilot and roll out with the wider development of locality working across Nottinghamshire • Six further families of schools in September 2007, with a rolling programme from then • Multi-agency appraisal of the gradual development of this virtual model towards full integration, based on a single point accountability • All services that can be managed through a single-point accountability, locality model to be integrated within three years.

More Related