1 / 22

Starting a Movement: Let’s go to SALC!

This article discusses the importance of self-access language centers in improving English skills and encourages students to use these centers. It also addresses the challenges faced by students who are reluctant or unable to access the center. The article explores strategies to create a culture of self-access and decision-making techniques to help users overcome choice overload. Further research and references are provided.

lmanuel
Télécharger la présentation

Starting a Movement: Let’s go to SALC!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Self-Access Conversations: Beyond Classroom Borders Self Access Forum (@202B) Nov. 23rd , Sum (5:40 PM - 7:10 PM) Starting a Movement: Let’s go to SALC! • Satomi Shibata

  2. Autonomous • Want to improve their English skills • Use the center whenever they need • Do not hesitate to ask questions • Understand what they need themselves Learner types • Passive • Want to improve their English skills • Somehow can’t enter the center or ask teachers (advisers) • Amotivated/ Reluctant • Not interested in English skills • Interested in something else • Just need to graduate

  3. Centers at TWO universities • Both are similar (Size, human resources, budget) • English major • 100 students in a year • One teacher, one student teaching assistant • English conversation sessions • Advising

  4. Tokoha University • Three campuses • Shizuoka Campus : 2000 students • Faculty of foreign language: 150 each year • English: 100 each year (main users: 1st, 2nd year students) • English level (TOEIC 170-930)

  5. Relatively Small SALC • One staff, one teacher, one student teaching assistant • Four teachers (American, Canadian, or Spanish) Conversation Practice session 45 to 90 minutes a week • Five Japanese teachers work when I don’t work. 90 minutes a week • Japanese is spoken.

  6. Budget • Students teaching assistants (since 2008) • Books (2014 for the first time!!!)

  7. What we do… • TOEFL, TOEIC, EIKEN, Other foreign language tests • Studying abroad programs (one month, two months, 7months) • Advising • Conversation Practice session • Books (Extensive reading:3000, tests:70) • Events (Halloween, Christmas, Speech contests)

  8. Users • 100 users a day • 150 books a day

  9. With Limited Human Resources… • Starting a Movement • Arranging Choices Create the environment (school culture) Let’s-go-to-SALCculture

  10. With Limited Human Resources… • Starting a Movement • Arranging Choices Create the environment (school culture) Let’s-go-to-SALCculture

  11. Starting a Movement • Threshold model of collective action (Granovetter, 1978) • Leader and follower: The important role of the first follower (Shivers, 2010)

  12. What does everybody do? Nagoya ⇒ Studying abroad program (70% of the students go abroad + travelling) ⇒ TOEFL ⇒ To work in Tokyo, Osaka, other area. Shizuoka ⇒ Only 30 % or less ⇒ Not TOEFL ⇒ To work in Shizuoka

  13. What does everybody do? • Difference between Nagoya and Shizuoka • Economy Studying abroad was NOT for everybody. Extensive Reading

  14. With Limited Human Resources… • Starting a Movement • Arranging Choices Create the environment (school culture) Let’s-go-to-SALCculture

  15. So many choices • Enter the center or not • How long to stay • Talk to someone or not • With whom • Come back again or not • Use more than one usage

  16. Help Users Decision Making • …choice overload problem affects us even in very consequential decisions. • We choose not to choose, even when it goes against our best self-interests. • Four techniques for mitigating the problem of choice overload (Iyenger 2011)

  17. Help Users Decision Making • cut -- get rid of the extraneous alternatives • concretize -- make it real • categorize -- handle more categories, less choices • condition for complexity.

  18. Extensive Reading • cut -- get rid of the extraneous alternatives (Three to Four kinds) • concretize -- make it real (Example from the previous year. In class, SALC) • categorize -- handle more categories, less choices (Different shelves) • condition for complexity. (April: Extensive Reading, November: )

  19. Let’s –go-to-SALCCulture • Nagoya? Shizuoka?   ⇒ What are their interests? • Economy? ⇒How does it affect on their learning? • Data: Fostering followers  ⇒Showing successful examples, sharing episodes • When to encourage: Difficult to change life style ⇒April, May, September, October, before breaks

  20. Further research • What can we do more with the limited human resources? • How can we encourage the admiration and other teachers to understand more about self-access centers? (English Education centers, International communication centers, self-access centers ⇒ more demand on workload)

  21. References Dweck, C (2006). Mindset. NY: Random house. (邦訳:今西康子『「やればできる!」の研究』草思社) 林日出男 (2012). 『動機づけ視点で見る日本人の英語学習: 内発的・外発的動機づけを軸に』 東京: 金星堂. Iyengar, S. (2010). The art of choosing. New York, NY: Twelve. (邦訳:櫻井祐子『選択の科学』文藝春秋) MacGonigal, K. (2012) Maximum willpower. UK: Macmillan.(邦訳:神崎朗子『スタンフォードの自分を変える教師』大和書房) Shibata, S. (2012). The macro-and micro-language learning counseling: An autoethnographic account. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3(1), 108-121. Shivers, D (2010). How to start a movement: TED presentation. https://www.ted.com/talks/derek_sivers_how_to_start_a_movement Thaler, R.H. & Sustain, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York: Penguin Books. 上田信行(2009). 『プレイフル・シンキング』東京:宣伝会議. 上淵寿(2004). 『動機づけ研究の最前線』京都:北大路書房. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thank you very much. satomishibata@sz.tokoha-u.ac.jp

More Related