1 / 17

Bias Due to Unmeasured Covariates

Bias Due to Unmeasured Covariates. Confounding by Indication. Alec Walker. U. T. D. T. D. Confounders. U. T. D. Confounders. U. Randomization. T. D. Confounders. U. Randomization. Self-matching. T. D. A “Classic” Example: Cimetidine and Gastric Cancer.

lois-gaines
Télécharger la présentation

Bias Due to Unmeasured Covariates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bias Due toUnmeasured Covariates Confounding by Indication Alec Walker

  2. U T D

  3. T D

  4. Confounders U T D

  5. Confounders U Randomization T D

  6. Confounders U Randomization Self-matching T D

  7. A “Classic” Example: Cimetidine and Gastric Cancer

  8. Does cimetidine cause stomach cancer? • Case reports of de novo appearance in 1982 • Colin-Jones et al looked at data from ongoing work • Persons treated with cimetidine in a 12-month window • Matched to a comparison person • General practitioner • Age • Sex • Seen for another condition • Examined the incidence of stomach cancer

  9. Diagnosed before cimetidine treatment started Diagnosed within six months of starting cimetidine treatment Diagnosed more than six months after starting cimetidine treatment Controls Cases of “early” cancer Diagnosed before cimetidine treatment started Diagnosed within six months of starting cimetidine treatment Diagnosed more than six months after starting cimetidine treatment Controls Cases of “early” cancer Number of cases Before study |  Study period  | After study Excess cases during follow-up Colin-Jones et al. Cimetidine and gastric cancer: preliminary report from post-marketing surveillance study. Brit Med J 1982;285:1311-1313

  10. Hypotheses to account for excess cancers Colin-Jones and his coauthors suggested that • Stomach cancer incidence was only an artifact of treatment having come before diagnosis in disease was already present – The as-yet undetected disease caused the use of cimetidine and led to detected disease. They hypothesized that the effect would disappear with longer follow-up.

  11. Excess persisted for years Colin-Jones DG. Postmarketing surveillance of the safety of cimetidine: mortality during second, third, and fourth years of follow up. Brit Med J 1985;291:1084-8

  12. Hypotheses to account for excess deaths • Stomach cancer – The as-yet undetected disease caused the use of cimetidine and led to detected disease.

  13. Hypotheses to account for excess deaths • Stomach cancer – The as-yet undetected disease caused the use of cimetidine and led to detected disease. • Lung cancer – Shared determinants. Cigarette smoking predisposes to persistence of stomach ulcer, which in turn leads to cimetidine use. The smoking also causes lung cancer.

  14. Hypotheses to account for excess deaths • Stomach cancer – The as-yet undetected disease caused the use of cimetidine and led to detected disease. • Lung cancer – Shared determinants. Cigarette smoking predisposes to persistence of stomach ulcer, which in turn leads to cimetidine use. The smoking also causes lung cancer. • GI disease – Conditions that motivated cimetidine use led to death.

  15. Hypotheses to account for excess deaths • Stomach cancer – The as-yet undetected disease caused the use of cimetidine and led to detected disease. • Lung cancer – Shared determinants. Cigarette smoking predisposes to persistence of stomach ulcer, which in turn leads to cimetidine use. The smoking also causes lung cancer. • GI disease – Conditions that motivated cimetidine use led to death. Under each of these hypotheses, cimetidine use was driven by unmeasured factors that also led to the outcomes. The argument was that cimetidine did not cause the deaths from GI disease, stomach cancer or lung cancer, but confounding created associations and the false appearance of causal relations.

  16. But were any of these hypotheses correct? • Stomach cancer – The as-yet undetected disease caused the use of cimetidine and led to detected disease. • Lung cancer – Shared determinants. Cigarette smoking predisposes to persistence of stomach ulcer, which in turn leads to cimetidine use. The smoking also causes lung cancer. • GI disease – Conditions that motivated cimetidine use led to death. Colin-Jones and colleagues could not know for sure. Had they used a different study design, an answer might have been clear.

  17. Mechanisms that underlie confounding by indication • Prognosis • Doctors act in patients’ interest • Protopathic bias • Treatment for symptoms of an undiagnosed disease • Shared risk factors • The disease points back to its own risk-filled origins

More Related