1 / 34

CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results

CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results. Paul Emma SLAC January 14, 2002 BERLIN. CSR Workshop. Chicane CSR Test-Case. Use line-charge CSR    transient model described in LCLS-TN-01-12 … (Stupakov/Emma, Dec. 2001) [same now used in Elegant ] …based on TESLA-FEL-96-14

lona
Télécharger la présentation

CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results Paul Emma SLAC January 14, 2002 BERLIN CSR Workshop

  2. Chicane CSR Test-Case Use line-charge CSR  transient model described in LCLS-TN-01-12… (Stupakov/Emma, Dec. 2001) [same now used in Elegant] …based on TESLA-FEL-96-14 (Saldin et al., Nov. 1996) (T566 included, no ISR* added) * incoherent synchrotron radiation

  3. Initial Gaussian Distribution Prior to Chicane perfectly linear correlation sE/E0 = 0.72 %  bunch head ss = 200 mm E0 = 5 GeV

  4. Second Order Compression Included: T566 /mm T566 -3R56/2 leads to slight bunch shape distortion after drift-3 before drift-3

  5. Beta and Dispersion Functions B2 B3 B1 B4 ‘CSR-altered’ bx ‘linear’ bx hx-max 267 mm ‘linear’ hx

  6. Bunch Length and R56 B2 B3 B1 B4 ss0 = 200 mm ss = 20 mm B2 B4 B3 B1 R56 = -25 mm

  7. Line-Charge Validity Is transverse bunch size small ? B2 B3 B1 B4 x3/(Rs2) << 1 (Derbenev et. al.)

  8. CSR may be over-estimated in present tracking… s s s s (s- s) Rj3/24 fields evaluated and immediately applied, without including longer bunch at retarded position  over-estimate? R R j

  9. Final s-d phase space (gaussian input) sE/E0 = 0.716 %  bunch head ss = 20.3 mm

  10. Energy Spread and Emittance (gaussian) B2 B4 B3 B1 E /E0 -0.043% sd 0.021% B2 B4 B3 B1 gex 1.52 mm

  11. Total RMS Relative Energy Spread (including ‘chirp’) B2 B4 B3 B1

  12. Chicane CSR-wake Movie (gaussian)

  13. Chicane CSR-integrated-wake (gaussian)

  14. Final x-x Phase Space (gaussian input) ge 1.52 mm geCSR 0.145 mm ge0 = 1.00 mm bopt 1.37 m aopt-1.10

  15. Final x-x Phase Space (gaussian & optimalb0, a0) emittance growth can be reduced by choosing matchedb-functions ge 1.15 mm geCSR 0.145 mm bbopt aaopt ge0 = 1.00 mm

  16. Beta and emittance (gaussian & optimalb0, a0) too big? bmin 0.6 m bbopt aaopt gex 1.15 mm

  17. CSR wakefields (gaussian  bend-1 to drift-2) bend-1 (10) L = 0.4 m drift-1 (20) L = 5 m Nbin = 600, smoothed over 4 bend-2 (10) L = 0.4 m drift-2 (10) L = 1 m

  18. CSR wakefields (gaussian  bend-3 to drift-4) bend-3 (20) L = 0.4 m drift-3 (40) L = 5 m drift-4 (20) L = 2 m bend-4 (20) L = 0.4 m

  19. Compressing Uniform Distribution rise/fall ‘time’ > R/g3 0.1 Å

  20. Final s-d phase space – Uniform input dist. sE/E0 = 0.720 % ss = 20.2 mm

  21. Now add incoherent synch. rad. in each bend (sE/E0)ISR 1.910-5 sE/E0 = 0.720 % less structure on bunch ss = 20.2 mm

  22. Energy Spread and Emittance (uniform dist.) E /E0 -0.046% sd 0.007% emittance growth reduced compared to gaussian gex 1.12 mm

  23. Chicane CSR-wake Movie (uniform dist.)

  24. Chicane CSR-integrated-wake (uniform dist.)

  25. Final x-x Phase Space (uniform dist.) ge 1.12 mm geCSR 0.07 mm ge0 = 1.00 mm bopt 3.9 m aopt-0.51

  26. CSR wakefields (uniform dist.  bend-1 to drift-2) bend-1 (10) L = 0.4 m drift-1 (20) L = 5 m Nbin = 600, smoothed over 4 bend-2 (10) L = 0.4 m drift-2 (10) L = 1 m

  27. CSR wakefields (uniform dist.  bend-3 to drift-4) bend-3 (20) L = 0.4 m drift-3 (40) L = 5 m drift-4 (20) L = 2 m bend-4 (20) L = 0.4 m

  28. Betatron Amplitude per Bunch Slice gaussian l(s) uniform l(s)

  29. Final s-d phase space - Single-Bend sE/E0 = 0.011 % ss = 20.1 mm

  30. Energy Spread and Emittance – Single Bend (24ssR2)1/3 sd = 0.011% steady-state bend magnet

  31. CSR-Wake Movie - Single-Bend

  32. Try a Double-Chicane (two ‘test’-chicanes) hx 244 mm -I hx 107 mm R56= -21 mm R56= -4 mm ss 200 mm E0 = 5 GeV ss 50 mm ss 20 mm

  33. CSR Energy Loss, Spread, and Emittance (double-chicane) E /E0 -0.052% energy loss and spread are larger than for a single-chicane sd 0.028% projected emittance growth is greatly reduced using double-chicane single-chicane double-chicane gex 1.01 mm

  34. Final s-d phase space (double-chicane) sE/E0 = 0.712 % ss = 20.4 mm projected emittance growth is much smaller, but micro-bunching is worse

More Related