1 / 20

Status report on the new charged hodoscope for P326

Status report on the new charged hodoscope for P326. Mauro Raggi for the HODO working group Perugia – Firenze 07/09/2005. Outline. The ALICE MRPC Detector layout Performance: time resolution, efficiency, rate, and ageing MRPC in the P326 Charged hodoscope

Télécharger la présentation

Status report on the new charged hodoscope for P326

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Status report on the new charged hodoscope for P326 Mauro Raggi for the HODO working group Perugia – Firenze 07/09/2005 Mauro Raggi

  2. Outline • The ALICE MRPC • Detector layout • Performance: time resolution, efficiency, rate, and ageing • MRPC in the P326 Charged hodoscope • Possible design for charged hodo • Channels and readout • The signal collection and the new PCB layout • Prototype development status • Conclusion Mauro Raggi

  3. The ALICE Multigap Resistive Plate Chambers (MRPC) Mauro Raggi

  4. ALICE detector layout • 13x120 cm2 area for each module • 7x120 cm2 active area for each module • 2 anode and 1 chatode PCB with picup pads • 5+5 250 mm gaps filled with gas mixture • 1 cm honeycombs panel for mechanical stability • 96 pads per module readout with 32 flat cable • Differential signal send to interface card • Greater number of gaps • Lower HV (+6.5 kV, -6.5 kV) • Signal amplitude greater of a factor 2 Mauro Raggi

  5. The ALICE PCB layout Mauro Raggi

  6. FrontEnd electronic ALICE has developed for this porpouse, fast (1ns peaking time) front-end amplifier/discriminator (NINO). Each NINO can handle 8 channels. The input is low impedance (40-75 Ω) differential, and the output standard is an open-collector LVDS (Low Voltage Differential Signal). NINO can respond to another signal immediately (few ns) after the end of a previous signal (almost no dead time). On each front end card 3 NINO chip are mounted so the card can handle 24 ch. The NINO ASIC bonded to the PCB Mauro Raggi

  7. MRPC performance Efficiency > 99%Time resol. < 50 ps Test performed with the ALICE TOF rate 50 Hz Mauro Raggi

  8. Rate tests at GIF • The MRPC were tested for efficiency up to a rate of 1.6 kHz • The performance seem to be stable only using an effective voltage of 11.4 kV • The MRPC were tested for time resolution up to a rate of 1.6 kHz • The time resolution seem to decrease a little bit • The resolution at 1.6 kHz is well above 100 ps • This performance are very suitable for P326 • New high rate test are mandatory to validate performance up to 5 kHz Mauro Raggi

  9. Irradiation with 7∙109 particles/cm2 Ageing test at GIF • The performances seem to remain stable in time • The total amount of irradiated charge is equivalent to only 140 days of P326 run: Mauro Raggi

  10. The new P326 Charged Hodoscope Mauro Raggi

  11. Fast Charged Hodo requiremets • Time resolution better than 100 ps • Operation rate > 2 kHz/cm2 beam region • “Q1” Efficiency >99% with low “Q2” contamination • Radiation hardeness to resist to 240 days of run • No dead space • Low material budget in front of LKR Mauro Raggi

  12. 120 cm 120 cm Front end electronics Possible hodo layout • 240x240 cm2 detector • 2 or 3 planes to avoid dead space • 4 quadrants: 120x120 cm2 • ~ 960 pads per quadrant • ~ 20 slabs 6x120 cm2 sensible area • ≤ 48 pads per slab The final geometry and granularity will be fixed using MC simulation Mauro Raggi

  13. Beam Plane 1 Plane 2 Beam Plane 1 Plane 2 Plane 3 Possible slab configuration Solution A Solution B Mauro Raggi

  14. The new PCB for P326 • The PCB design used by ALICE is not suitable for P326: • The connectors on each side introduce too much dead space between two modules • It’is very difficult to bring signals out of the detector using ALICE configuration • The material budget would not be uniform due to connectors and cables • A new layout of the PCB has to be designed • Strip line to transport the signal to one side of the detector • Connectors only at the end of each module Mauro Raggi

  15. P326 ALICE The problem of signal collection In the ALICE configuration you do not have any reflection due to very short trasmission line from pads to connectors In P326 the longer transimission line is up to 120cm. This may introduce reflections of the signal if the line impedence is not controlled. The impedence of the strip line can be controlled using a ground plane in the PCB Mauro Raggi

  16. Layout of a single stack module PCB catodico Ground layerStrip line layerPad layerEmpty layer +10-13 KV 550mm glass 6 Gaps 250mm 5 x 400mm glasses 550mm glass 0 flottante Empty layerPad layerStrip line layerGround layer PCB anodico New detector for P326 Mauro Raggi

  17. Ground plane 0.5 mm Strip line plane 1 mm 1.7 mm 0.7 mm Pads plane 0.4 mm 0.5 mm Empty plane PCB Layout • Total thickness 1.7 mm • Empty plane thickness fixed by high HV ≤ 15 kV • Ground plane thickness = empty plane one due to symmetry • Pads dimension 2.4x3.4 cm2 • 48 stripline of 0.4 mm width with a distance of 1 mm to avoid crosstalk Mauro Raggi

  18. Layout of PCB prototype with 48 channels 10 cm 20 cm 30 cm 60 cm 48 pads =2.4*3.4 cm2 connected to the readout 48 pads =2.4*3.4 cm2 not connected to the readout 50 pin connector The first prototype We will use exaclty the same geometry of the alice PCB but introducing strip to transport the signal and the ground plane We want to check if the signal transportation through strips to the final connector will actually work What is the effect of the ground plane in the efficiency and timing performance of the detector Mauro Raggi

  19. HV Interfaceboard FE electronicboards Gas in For each MRPC 48 readout channels 2 flat 50 pin connectors 2 front end boards each MRPC 6 front end “Nino” chips MRPC-1 MRPC-2 MRPC-3 All test facility 144 readout channels 6 flat 50 pin connectors 6 front end boards each MRPC 18 front end “Nino” chips The test facility In order to test the module performance we will contruct a 3 modules test facility Mauro Raggi

  20. Conclusion • A first prototipe for a hodo module has been developed • The production of the PCB starts in september • First prototype assembly foreseen in october • Cosmic ray test will be hopefully done within 2005 • Test of efficiency and time resolution at high rate are mandatory to validate detector performance in the P326 environment: test with NA48 facility in 2006. Mauro Raggi

More Related