1 / 9

ESCIT Ballot Results: Sequence IIIG-EOT Preferred For Catalyst Testing

The ESCIT voted on January 8, 2007, to support Sequence IIIG-EOT as the preferred catalyst test duration. A total of 17 ballots were returned, with 16 votes cast and one abstention. Members favored Sequence IIIG-EOT while providing secondary support for PEI165 (16 hr), TEOST MHT, and Sequence IIIG at 20/40 hours. Comments highlighted TEOST MHT as a cost-effective existing test that ensures compliance with the ILSAC GF-5 timeline. The consensus reflects a commitment to advancing testing methodologies critical for engine oil specifications.

lorie
Télécharger la présentation

ESCIT Ballot Results: Sequence IIIG-EOT Preferred For Catalyst Testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ESCIT Ballot January 8, 2007

  2. Ballot Results • Sequence IIIG preferred by a majority of the members • Sequence IIIG-EOT was the preferred duration • Secondary support was equally divided between: • PEI165 16 hr • TEOST MHT • Sequence IIIG at 20/40 hours • Consensus vote in favor of the statement regarding SwRI’s catalyst test

  3. Ballots • 17 returned ballots • 16 test votes cast, 1 abstention EOT 40-hr 20-hr

  4. Votes by industry • ILSAC members supported the Sequence IIIG-EOT uniformly. • API/ACC members spread support between the three options. • Labs/others supported the PEI165 or abstained.

  5. Comments • In support of TEOST MHT: • It is an “existing, cost-effective bench test that is appropriate for measuring phosphorus retention and/or volatility.” • It will “not negatively affect the ILSAC GF-5 timeline as the test is already in-place and monitored by the ASTM-TMC.” • It correlates with the a catalyst test which shows correlation with the field. • “Best precision and correlation” with field and catalyst data • It is an “existing bench test” and additional data can be generated quickly.

  6. Comments • In support of the IIIG • Using the retained phosphorus from a Sequence IIIG test after 20, 40, or 100 hours would be acceptable; the results after 100 hours are the most robust. • In support of the PEI165 • “Provides the most data to correlate with field/dyno tests…” coupled with “the best precision/discrimination of all tests” considered. • A bench test that correlates engine and field data is a better path with respect to setting acceptable levels and precision of phosphorus volatility

  7. Comments • Other: • ESCIT should finalize test recommendation in January to ILSAC/Oil to keep GF-5 progress according to the current timeline.

  8. Conclusion & Next Steps • ESCIT by majority supports the Sequence IIIG-EOT. • Next up: • Letter to ILSAC/Oil • Calculation method • Limits setting

  9. Addendum • Voting Parties • RT Vanderbilt, Lubrizol, Chevron Oronite, Infineum, Afton, Phosphorus Derivatives Inc., RohMax, General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Nissan, Savant, Tannas, SwRI, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips

More Related