110 likes | 238 Vues
Matching of molybdenum waveguide. Comparison of measurements and HFSS calculations for molybdenum waveguide, sigma_moly = 1.87e8 1/(Ohm-m). V.Dolgashev, J. Lewandowski, 26 January 03. Comparison of measurements and HFSS calculations for molybdenum waveguide, sigma_moly = 1.87e8 1/(Ohm-m).
E N D
Comparison of measurements and HFSS calculations for molybdenum waveguide, sigma_moly = 1.87e8 1/(Ohm-m) V.Dolgashev, J. Lewandowski, 26 January 03
Comparison of measurements and HFSS calculations for molybdenum waveguide, sigma_moly = 1.87e8 1/(Ohm-m) V.Dolgashev, J. Lewandowski, 26 January 03
HFSS simulations of the molybdenum waveguide, surface electric fields for 100 MW input power E [V/m] s [mm] V.Dolgashev, 23 January 03
HFSS simulations of the molybdenum waveguide, surface magnetic fields for 100 MW input power, no posts H [A/m] s [mm] V.Dolgashev, 23 January 03
Matching of the molybdenum waveguide V.Dolgashev, 26 January 03
Magnetic field on the output post S11 = 0.17814 V.Dolgashev, 26 January 03
HFSS simulations of the molybdenum waveguide Model build from QC data plus tuning posts. The post designed to match measured data (not the model) Model build from QC data V.Dolgashev, 26 January 03
HFSS simulations of the molybdenum waveguide, surface electric fields for 100 MW input power with tuning posts (post match measurements) E [V/m] s [mm] V.Dolgashev, 26 January 03
HFSS simulations of the molybdenum waveguide, surface magnetic fields for 100 MW input power, waveguide matched by posts H [A/m] s [mm] V.Dolgashev, 23 January 03
Measurements of the molybdenum waveguide before brazing posts V.Dolgashev, J. Lewandowski, 11 February 03