1 / 11

Comparison of HFSS Calculations and Measurements for Molybdenum Waveguide Matching

This study compares HFSS simulations and experimental measurements of a molybdenum waveguide, focusing on matching, surface electric and magnetic fields. The conductivity of molybdenum is noted as σ_moly = 1.87e8 (Ohm-m). Various simulation scenarios are explored, including configurations with and without tuning posts while applying 100 MW input power. The findings reveal significant insights into the performance of molybdenum waveguides and the impact of design elements on the electromagnetic field distributions and matching efficiency.

lorin
Télécharger la présentation

Comparison of HFSS Calculations and Measurements for Molybdenum Waveguide Matching

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Matching of molybdenum waveguide

  2. Comparison of measurements and HFSS calculations for molybdenum waveguide, sigma_moly = 1.87e8 1/(Ohm-m) V.Dolgashev, J. Lewandowski, 26 January 03

  3. Comparison of measurements and HFSS calculations for molybdenum waveguide, sigma_moly = 1.87e8 1/(Ohm-m) V.Dolgashev, J. Lewandowski, 26 January 03

  4. HFSS simulations of the molybdenum waveguide, surface electric fields for 100 MW input power E [V/m] s [mm] V.Dolgashev, 23 January 03

  5. HFSS simulations of the molybdenum waveguide, surface magnetic fields for 100 MW input power, no posts H [A/m] s [mm] V.Dolgashev, 23 January 03

  6. Matching of the molybdenum waveguide V.Dolgashev, 26 January 03

  7. Magnetic field on the output post S11 = 0.17814 V.Dolgashev, 26 January 03

  8. HFSS simulations of the molybdenum waveguide Model build from QC data plus tuning posts. The post designed to match measured data (not the model) Model build from QC data V.Dolgashev, 26 January 03

  9. HFSS simulations of the molybdenum waveguide, surface electric fields for 100 MW input power with tuning posts (post match measurements) E [V/m] s [mm] V.Dolgashev, 26 January 03

  10. HFSS simulations of the molybdenum waveguide, surface magnetic fields for 100 MW input power, waveguide matched by posts H [A/m] s [mm] V.Dolgashev, 23 January 03

  11. Measurements of the molybdenum waveguide before brazing posts V.Dolgashev, J. Lewandowski, 11 February 03

More Related