1 / 23

S-COMM Program Impacts in Massachusetts: A Critical Analysis

This report delves into the Secure Communities program in Massachusetts, highlighting its impact on deportations and community costs. It explores the implementation process, deportation statistics, priorities, and concerns regarding oversight and racial profiling. Contact Laura Rótolo, Staff Attorney, for more information.

lorin
Télécharger la présentation

S-COMM Program Impacts in Massachusetts: A Critical Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “S-COMM”ICE’s “Secure Communities” Program in Massachusetts Contact: Laura Rótolo, Staff Attorney(617) 482-3170 x311lrotolo@aclum.org May, 2012

  2. Background • Goal: increase deportations

  3. Background • Goal: increase deportations • 287(g) agreements allowed local police to enforce immigration laws

  4. HOW S-COMM WORKS arrest

  5. HOW S-COMM WORKS arrest

  6. HOW S-COMM WORKS CRIMINAL PROCESS arrest FBI

  7. HOW S-COMM WORKS CRIMINAL PROCESS arrest FBI

  8. HOW S-COMM WORKS CRIMINAL PROCESS arrest ICE FBI

  9. HOW S-COMM WORKS CRIMINAL PROCESS arrest ICE FBI IDENT Database

  10. HOW S-COMM WORKS CRIMINAL PROCESS arrest ICE FBI IDENT Database

  11. HOW S-COMM WORKS CRIMINAL PROCESS arrest ICE FBI IDENT Database no action but ICE retains fingerprints

  12. HOW S-COMM WORKS CRIMINAL PROCESS arrest ICE FBI IDENT Database no action but ICE retains fingerprints detention

  13. HOW S-COMM WORKS CRIMINAL PROCESS arrest ICE FBI IDENT Database no action but ICE retains fingerprints detention deportation

  14. NATIONAL NUMBERS 2008-PRESENT CRIMINAL PROCESS 15,382,805 arrest ICE FBI 883,270 IDENT Database no action but ICE retains fingerprints detention 182,896 deportation

  15. NUMBERS FROM BOSTON 2008-PRESENT CRIMINAL PROCESS arrest 60,583 ICE FBI 3,967 IDENT Database no action but ICE retains fingerprints detention 457 deportation

  16. S-Comm Stated Priorities “prioritize the identification and removal of aliens convicted of a crime by the severity of that crime” ---- • Level 1 - convicted of two or more felonies or one “aggravated felony” (as defined by ICE) • Level 2 – convicted of one felony or three or more misdemeanors • Level 3 – other misdemeanor convictions

  17. Reality: National Deportations October 2008 – March 31, 2012

  18. Deportations from Boston November 2008 – March 31, 2012

  19. Deployment of S-Comm • 2006: Pilot in Boston • 2008: Memo. of Agreement with states • Aug. 17, 2010: procedure for opt-out • October 2010: Janet Napolitano says that municipalities can’t opt-out if state has opted-in • 2011: ICE goes back on its promise; cancels all MOAs and begins to roll out program • 2012: S-Comm activated in Massachusetts

  20. Costs to the Community • No notice to the public or debate by publicly-elected officials before implementation. • Relies on the creation of huge databases with no oversight or audit mechanism and much flawed information. • Opens the door to racial profiling. • Feeds into a broken detention system. • Undermines community trust in police. • Costs municipalities money and resources – 48 hour detention.

  21. www.aclum.org www.aclum.org/s-comm/

More Related