1 / 31

Smart Driving Cars : Where Might We End Up? Ridesharing and Fleet Size Estimates for a

Smart Driving Cars : Where Might We End Up? Ridesharing and Fleet Size Estimates for a New Jersey Area –Wide aTaxi System Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering Director, Program in Transportation

lotte
Télécharger la présentation

Smart Driving Cars : Where Might We End Up? Ridesharing and Fleet Size Estimates for a

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Smart Driving Cars: Where Might We End Up? Ridesharing and Fleet Size Estimates for a New Jersey Area –Wide aTaxi System Alain L. KornhauserProfessor, Operations Research & Financial EngineeringDirector, Program in Transportation Faculty Chair, PAVE (Princeton Autonomous Vehicle Engineering Princeton UniversityBoard Chair, Advanced Transit Association (ATRA) and Chris Brownell ‘13 Princeton University Presented at 2013 TransAction Conference Atlantic City, NJ April 18, 2013

  2. Where might We End Up?

  3. “Pixelated” New Jersey (“1/2 mile square; 0.25mi2) • aTaxi Concept – (PRT) Model • Personal Rapid Transit Model • aTaxis operate between aTaxiStands • Autonomous vehicles wait for walk-up customers • Located in “center” of each pixel (max ¼ mile walk) • Departure is Delayed to facilitate ride-sharing • Vehicles are shared to Common Pixel destinations • aTaxi Concept – SPT Model • Smart Para Transit TransitModel • aTaxis circulate to pick up riders in 9-Pixel area (1.5 miles on side) • Vehicles are shared to Common 9-Pixel Destinations

  4. “Pixelated” New Jersey (“1/2 mile square; 0.25mi2) aTaxi Concept – (PRT) Model Personal Rapid Transit Model aTaxi Concept – SPT Model Smart Para Transit TransitModel Ref: http://orfe.princeton.edu/~alaink/Theses/2013/Brownell,%20Chris%20Final%20Thesis.pdf

  5. State-wide automatedTaxi (aTaxi) • Serves essentially all NJ travel demand (32M trips/day) • Shared ridership potential:

  6. State-wide automatedTaxi (aTaxi) • Serves essentially all NJ travel demand (32M trips/day) • Shared ridership potential:

  7. State-wide automatedTaxi (aTaxi) • Fleet size (Instantaneous Repositioning)

  8. State-wide automatedTaxi (aTaxi) • Abel to serve essentially all NJ travel demand (32M trips/day) • Shared ridership allows • Peak hour; peak direction: Av. vehicle occupancies to can reach ~ 3 p/v and eliminate much of the congestion • Essentially all congestion disappears with appropriate implications on the environment • Required fleet-size under 2M aTaxis (about half) • (3.71 registered automobiles in NJ (2009)

  9. Most every day… • Almost 9 Million NJ residents • 0.25 Million of out of state commuters • Make 30+ Million trips • Throughout the 8,700 sq miles of NJ • Where/when do they start? • Where do they go? • Does anyone know??? • I certainly don’t • Not to sufficient precision for credible analysis

  10. I’ve Tried… • I’ve harvested one of the largest troves of GPS tracks • Literally billions of individual trips, • Unfortunately, they are spread throughout the western world, throughout the last decade. • Consequently, I have only a very small ad hoc sample of what happens in NJ on a typical day.

  11. Project Overview Trip Synthesizer • Motivation – Publicly available data do not contain: • Spatial precision • Where are people leaving from? • Where are people going? • Temporal precision • At what time are they travelling? ORF 467 Fall 2012

  12. Why do I want to know every trip? • Academic Curiosity • If offered an alternative, which ones would likely “buy it” and what are the implications. • More specifically: • If an alternative transport system were available, which trips would be diverted to it and what operational requirements would those trip impose on the new system? • In the end… • a transport system serves individual decision makers. It’s patronage is an ensemble of individuals, • I would prefer analyzing each individual trip patronage opportunity.

  13. Synthesize from publically available data: • “every” NJ Traveler on a typical day NJ_Residentfile • Containing appropriate demographic and spatial characteristics that reflect trip making • “every” trip that each Traveler is likely to make on a typical day. NJ_PersonTrip file • Containing appropriate spatial and temporal characteristics for each trip

  14. Creating the NJ_Residentfile for “every” NJ Traveler on a typical day NJ_Resident file Start with Publically available data:

  15. 2010 Population census @Block Level • 8,791,894 individuals distributed 118,654 Blocks.

  16. Publically available data: • Distributions of Demographic Characteristics • Age • Gender • Household size • Name (Last, First)

  17. Final NJ_Resident file Home County Person Index Household Index Full Name Age Gender Worker Type Index Worker Type String Home lat, lon Work or School lat,lon Work County Work or School Index NAICS code Work or School start/end time

  18. Assigning a Daily Activity (Trip) Tour to Each Person

  19. NJ_PersonTrip file • 9,054,849 records • One for each person in NJ_Resident file • Specifying 32,862,668 Daily Person Trips • Each characterized by a precise • Origination, Destination and Departure Time

  20. Project Overview Overview of Data Production Generate population Assign work places Assign schools Assign tours / activity patterns Assign other trips Assign arrival / departure times ORF 467 Fall 2012

  21. Warren County • Population: 108,692 Intra-pixel Trips

  22. NJ Transit Train Station “Consumer-shed”

  23. Metro Park Metuchen “Manhattan Customer-shed” Regions for NJ Transit Train Stations Edison New Brunswick Princeton Yellow Lines connect 0.25 mi2 areas to nearest NJT Train Station where Distance is a “Manhattan Metric” = |Dx|+ |Dy| Princeton Jct. Hamilton Trenton

  24. Edison New Brunswick “Manhattan Customer-shed” Regions for NJ Transit Train Stations Princeton Yellow Lines connect 0.25 mi2 areas to nearest NJT Train Station where Distance is a “Manhattan Metric” = |Dx|+ |Dy| Princeton Jct. Hamilton

  25. Discussion!

  26. Thank You

More Related