1 / 14

E NERGY S TAR ® Monitor Industry Meeting April 29, 2002 San Francisco, CA Craig Hershberg US EPA Hershberg.Craig@epa.g

E NERGY S TAR ® Monitor Industry Meeting April 29, 2002 San Francisco, CA Craig Hershberg US EPA Hershberg.Craig@epa.gov www.energystar.gov. Why Are We Here?. Maintain open lines of communication to arrive at a challenging and fair specification

lotus
Télécharger la présentation

E NERGY S TAR ® Monitor Industry Meeting April 29, 2002 San Francisco, CA Craig Hershberg US EPA Hershberg.Craig@epa.g

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ENERGY STAR® Monitor Industry Meeting April 29, 2002 San Francisco, CA Craig Hershberg US EPA Hershberg.Craig@epa.gov www.energystar.gov

  2. Why Are We Here? • Maintain open lines of communication to arrive at a challenging and fair specification • Very interested in your input as you have in-depth product and market knowledge • Present EPA’s program framework and convey flexibility in terms of efficiency levels based on manufacturer data

  3. Meeting Goals • Present Draft 1 Monitor Specification • Solicit industry feedback on all aspects of the specification and partner commitments • Initiate timeline for developing final specification

  4. Roles and Responsibilities • TCO Development: Presentations this afternoon and tomorrow • Logistical simplicity • Harmonization over the long term • NRDC and other interested parties: Provided recommendations to EPA • Elements included in draft specification • Co-presenters with EPA in today’s agenda

  5. ENERGY STAR • Voluntary partnership with EPA and DOE • Easily identifies energy-efficient products for home and office • Representing approx. top 25% in their category for energy efficiency • One label at the national level for over 30 products • Reduces air pollution and saves money • Turn-key solution • International presence

  6. Computer Monitor • A commercially available electronic product with a display screen and its associated electronics encased in a single housing that is capable of displaying output information from a computer via one or more inputs, such as VGA, DVI, and/or IEEE 1394. • CRT, LCD, or other display device • No devices or an upstream cord connected to hub/port when monitor is being tested • Attempted to differentiate TVs and monitors based on how they are marketed and sold

  7. The Big Picture • Savings in 2010 under proposed monitor specifications: • Energy: 26 billion kWh • Energy Bill (in 2001 $): $1.8 billion • Carbon: 3.5 MMT • Equivalent to 29 billion lbs of CO2not emitted into air • Equals yearly emissions of approx. 2.5 million cars Notes: (1) Savings include active, sleep, and off, and (2) Assumes CRTs are replaced with a mix of ENERGY STAR qualified LCDs and CRTs, with increases in market penetration going to LCDs

  8. April 2002 • EPA releases Draft 1 Specification • First EPA/Industry meeting May 2002 • Industry to test products and submit data/suggestions to EPA • EPA/EU meeting in Nice, France June 2002 • EU and industry to provide comments on Draft 1 Specification • EPA issues Draft 2 Specification July 2002 • Executive Order 1 year anniversary • EU and industry to provide comments on Draft 2 Specification August - Fall 2002 • EPA releases subsequent drafts as needed • EU and industry to provide comments as needed • EPA finalizes specification, preferably in late summer January 2003 • V4.0 tentatively takes effect Timeline: Key Proposed Dates

  9. European Union • Signed agreement between EPA and EU to coordinate OE labeling • Work together to develop new or revised specifications covered by agreement • EPA to present draft monitor specifications to EU in late May in Nice, France • EPA would like initial industry feedback in 3 weeks to include in EU presentation

  10. Why Active Power? • Feasible without negatively affecting product performance; in fact, some manufacturers are already meeting the proposed specifications • Limited additional energy savings potential in sleep and off modes • Not dependent on enabling rates • Allows a variety of technologies (e.g., CRT and LCD) to qualify

  11. Recognizing LCDs • Highlight a new technology in the marketplace • Additional benefits: • Space • Heat • Power consumption • Useful life • Installation • Disposal

  12. Key Stakeholders • Panel Manufacturers • Final Assemblers/Resellers • European and Asian Labeling Programs • Retailers • Market Transformation Community (Utilities, Regional Groups, and Environmental Organizations)

  13. Mayo Clinic Case Study • More and more businesses, ranging from hospitals to financial institutions, are making the switch to LCD monitors. • Mayo Clinic, in Rochester, MN, started making the switch to LCDs in 1996. • As of January 2002, they have over 7,900 LCD monitors in use around the hospital.

  14. Annual Savings for Mayo Clinic • For each 15” LCD monitor that replaced a 17” CRT monitor, the Clinic saved over $40 in energy bills. • This amounts to a total savings of over $321,135 annually.

More Related