1 / 17

Social impact categories, indicators, characterisation and damage modelling

Social impact categories, indicators, characterisation and damage modelling. Bo P. Weidema 2.-0 LCA consultants. Social impact categories. Starting point: Gross lists from social impact assessment literature, GRI, etc. Divide in inventory, midpoint and endpoint categories

lou
Télécharger la présentation

Social impact categories, indicators, characterisation and damage modelling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social impact categories,indicators, characterisationand damage modelling Bo P. Weidema 2.-0 LCA consultants

  2. Social impact categories • Starting point: Gross lists from social impact assessment literature, GRI, etc. • Divide in inventory, midpoint and endpoint categories • Net list of 30 social inventory categories. Examples: Missing education, Corruption, Missing property rights, Unequal treatment, Occupational health, Trade barriers, …

  3. Social impact categories • Filter out those categories that relate only to activities of government • Short list of 14 social inventory categories that can be influenced by industrial activities • Identify quantitative pressure (inventory) indicators for the 14 categories. Criteria: • Default data available from statistical sources • Credible monitoring possible at factory / company level

  4. Quantitative social pressure indicators (complete list):

  5. Quantitative social pressure (inventory) indicators

  6. Quantitative social pressure (inventory) indicators

  7. Quantitative social pressure (inventory) indicators

  8. Default values for social pressure indicators

  9. Default values for social pressure indicators

  10. Default values for social pressure indicators

  11. Modelling social and economic impact pathways • occupational health • missing education • corruption • perverse subsidies • excess work • union rights • infrastructure • unequal opportunities • poverty alleviation • pensions and social security • access to health care • workplace stress • unemployment • indigenous resources Social • Intrinsic • - Life & longevity • - Health • Autonomy • Safety, security & tranquillity • Equal opportunities • Participation & influence Activity Economical Economical • Instrumental • - Human productivity • - Biotic productivity • Natural capital (resources) • Man-made capital (resources) • distributional issues • - time usage

  12. Quantifying and aggregating impacts on human well-being • Intrinsic • - Life & longevity • - Health • Autonomy • Safety, security & tranquillity • Equal opportunities • Participation & influence LY Survival 100% Mortality gap 50% 0% Age 82

  13. Quantifying and aggregating impacts on human well-being • Intrinsic • - Life & longevity • - Health • Autonomy • Safety, security & tranquillity • Equal opportunities • Participation & influence DALY Health state 100% Health gap 50% 0% Age 82

  14. Quantifying and aggregating impacts on human well-being • Intrinsic • - Life & longevity • - Health • Autonomy • Safety, security & tranquillity • Equal opportunities • Participation & influence State of well-being 100% Well-being gap 50% 0% Age 82 QALY Incidence*Duration*Severity

  15. Modelling social and economic impact pathways • occupational health • missing education • corruption • perverse subsidies • excess work • union rights • infrastructure • unequal opportunities • poverty alleviation • pensions and social security • access to health care • workplace stress • unemployment • indigenous resources 0.004 – 0.54 QALYs per lost work-day Social • Intrinsic • - Life & longevity • - Health • Autonomy • Safety, security & tranquillity • Equal opportunities • Participation & influence Activity Economical wages lost Economical • Instrumental • - Human productivity • - Biotic productivity • Natural capital (resources) • Man-made capital (resources) • distributional issues • - time usage

  16. Monetarisation via the budget constraint • Damage categories • - Human well-being • Productivity QALY Budget constraint: Potential Global GEP with full human productivity = 84000 USD2003 / person i.e. 84000 USD2003 / QALY USD2003 Compare: $25000 (Human capital approach), $93000 (Revealed preferences), $160000 (Willingness-to-pay)

  17. First estimate of global normalisation values For comparison: Norm. ref. for biophysical impacts: 6590 USD/person

More Related