1 / 18

GAREC 2009

Centre of Activity Frequencies Experiences and the future Greg Mossop, G0DUB. GAREC 2009. Centre of Activity Frequencies. The concept of 'Centre of Activity' Frequencies was proposed at GAREC 2005 but no frequencies were specified

luann
Télécharger la présentation

GAREC 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Centre of Activity Frequencies Experiences and the future Greg Mossop, G0DUB GAREC 2009

  2. Centre of Activity Frequencies • The concept of 'Centre of Activity' Frequencies was proposed at GAREC 2005 but no frequencies were specified • Proposal adopted by the IARU Region 1 conference in the same year. • There was some logic in the choice of frequencies...

  3. Centre of Activity Frequencies • CoA are the same in all 3 regions for 15, 17 and 20m. Only these bands provide reliable intercontinental coverage and the bands are reasonably harmonised across all 3 regions. • 20m 14.300 MHz • 17m 18.160 MHz • 15m 21.360 MHz • 14.300 chosen because it “is the primary intercontinental channel in use by the US for its Katrina response operation.”

  4. Centre of Activity Frequencies • CoA at 80m and 40m are set on a region by region basis • “The logic for this is that harmonisation of CoAs at 40 and 80m would be difficult, and generally propagation would not support intercontinental traffic.” • This process was repeated in the other two IARU regions...

  5. Centre of Activity Frequencies Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 3760 3750 or 3985 3760 7110 7060, 7240 or 7290 7060 14300 14300 14300 18160 18160 18160 21360 21360 21360 • 7060kHz may still be used in Region 1 by countries which do not have access to 7.1-7.1MHz

  6. Centre of Activity Frequencies We do have some problems with the use of the frequencies... • Recognition by other Radio Amateurs. • Adoption by local Emergency Communications Groups • Clashes with existing users of frequencies. • How to we manage a 'centre of activity' with multi-modes in use ?

  7. Centre of Activity Frequencies

  8. Centre of Activity Frequencies

  9. Centre of Activity Frequencies

  10. Centre of Activity Frequencies • Some of the frequencies chosen have existing users, not all emergency communications related. • Proposal to move 80m CoA frequency from 3760kHz to 3750kHz at IARU Region 1 conference failed though this would have solved some problems in the UK.

  11. Centre of Activity Frequencies • Some changes such as moving from 7.060 to 7,110 MHz in Region 1 should have been good. • Away from contest segment of band. • No existing amateur usage. • But remaining broadcast usage has stopped groups moving to the new frequency in some areas.

  12. Centre of Activity Frequencies • We still have questions to answer about how to operate on the CoA frequencies. • How do we avoid inter-regional QRM ? • How do we identify a control station on the frequency ? • How do we separate different modes on the frequency ?

  13. Centre of Activity Frequencies • As Solar activity increases, inter-regional QRM will become more frequent – it is already happening now. • In GlobalSET where we have identified Control Stations by callsigns, they are still affected by QRM. • As conditions change, changing mode can be as effective as changing band.

  14. Centre of Activity Frequencies We need to remember that these are; Centres of Activity – not spot frequencies ! • Encourage spreading out from the centre. • Improve co-ordination between regions. • Maybe develop a protocol that Data is LF and voice HF of centre as conditions change.

  15. Centre of Activity Frequencies The solutions are in our hands through the GAREC conferences. This is the time to get things organised, not when an emergency has happened. Where do we go next ?

  16. Website www.iaru-r1.org Email gregm@raynet-hf.net Any Questions ?

More Related