1 / 16

Rubrics for Teachers

Rubrics for Teachers. November 1, 2011 with Dawn Shannon and Barb Phillips. Outcomes. . . To compare and contrast teacher rubrics To define criteria for selection within our district To describe advantages/disadvantages of “common rubrics”.

lucita
Télécharger la présentation

Rubrics for Teachers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rubrics for Teachers November 1, 2011 with Dawn Shannon and Barb Phillips

  2. Outcomes. . . • To compare and contrast teacher rubrics • To define criteria for selection within our district • To describe advantages/disadvantages of “common rubrics”

  3. If there were no mandate to improve teacher evaluation processes, what would you do? If one response was to clearly define and describe quality teaching, how would you begin?

  4. Why a rubric? What is a “rubric”? ru·bric noun • a title, heading, direction, or the like, in a manuscript, book, statute, etc., written or printed in red or otherwise distinguished from the rest of the text. • a direction for the conduct of divine service or the administration of the sacraments, inserted in liturgical books. • any established mode of conduct or procedure; protocol. • an explanatory comment • a class or category

  5. Why a rubric and not simply criteria?

  6. What do YOU value when you describe excellent teaching? Do other administrators and teachers value the same things? Why is this important?

  7. What are characteristics of excellent rubrics? • Clearly describe desired actions • Clearly distinguishes between “levels” • Thoroughly and completely defines the necessary actions

  8. Other criteria. . . • Length • Complexity • Values/orientations/emphasis of the rubric designers • Cost • Alignment with local values • “Scorability”

  9. Let’s look. . . . See summary of current rubrics.

  10. Let’s compare and contrast! What are engaged learners? What do teachers DO to engage learners?

  11. How do the rubrics describe “engaged learner”? • Pink: Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (ASCD) • Orange: Danielson (2011 Revised Edition) • Tan: Marshall’s Teacher Evaluation Rubric • Green: Marzano’s Causal Teacher Evaluation • Blue: NYSTCE Framework for the Observation of Effective Teaching (Pearson) • White: NYSUT’s Teacher Practice Rubric • Purple: Thoughtful Classroom Teacher Effectiveness (Silver Strong & Associates)

  12. Alignment with what YOU value. . . Take a look!

  13. What could a process look like in your district for selecting a rubric?

  14. A common rubric? Why? Why not?

  15. Other. . . • Relationship to principals’ rubric • Role of principals on the selection process • Designing inter-rater agreement and reliability

  16. THANK YOU!!!! Dawn and Barb

More Related