1 / 23

People

NSF Site Visit: Current Research Activities January 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim The University of Chicago. People. Faculty: Young-Kee Kim Post-docs: Un-Ki Yang - looking for a faculty position Vadim Rusu - Fermi Fellow, started Oct. 2003 Ivan Furic - Fermi Fellow, started Apr. 2004

lyndon
Télécharger la présentation

People

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NSF Site Visit:Current Research ActivitiesJanuary 14-15, 2005Young-Kee KimThe University of Chicago NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  2. People • Faculty: Young-Kee Kim • Post-docs: • Un-Ki Yang - looking for a faculty position • Vadim Rusu - Fermi Fellow, started Oct. 2003 • Ivan Furic - Fermi Fellow, started Apr. 2004 • Chicago Graduate Students: • Wojtek Fedorko (2nd year) • Clarisse Kim (1st year) - will start June 2005 • Remaining Berkeley Graduate Student: • Adam Gibson (5th year) • Undergraduate Students: • Annie Malkus • Jen Hsin • Jon Walsh • Edmund Berry NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  3. CDF Co-Spokespersons • YKK(term duration from June 2004 to June 2006), Luciano Ristori (Pisa) • Responsible for scientific program of CDF • CDF is now over 800 collaborators, 12 countries, 62 institutions. • Organized into detector operations, offline operations, and upgrade project, and physics groups • appointing physics and operations leaders. • organizing CDF weekly meetings, collaboration meetings, executive board meetings • appointing godparent committees for all analyses (~40 committees) • special committees: e.g. physics prioritization, internal reviews, … • MOU negociation • primary contact with laboratory (particle physics, accelerator physics, computing, directorate), high energy community, funding agencies, media, … • …… • Being co-spokesperson means I am effectively at Fermilab full time. NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  4. Physics Groups, Publications Physics Groups Organization: • Internal review processes by godparent committees after results are approved by physics groups. • Status: • 2001: Run II began • 2003: 4 papers published • 2004: 18 papers published or submitted • 2005 goal: 40 papers QCD B Electroweak (W,Z + …) Top Exotic (New Phenomena) physics groups: analysis groups: common tools, issues: dilepton l+jets all hadronic mass Joint Physics Meeting: Tracking, e, m, t, g, b-tagging, jet calibration, … Publications: NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  5. CDF Status • Detectors/Triggers/Offline working extremely well • effort to keep them running smoothly - high L, beam accidents, aging,.. • Accelerators delivering record luminosities: > 1 x 1032 • Collaboration focused on analysis: • so far ~10% of Run II luminosity. Exciting time has yet to come! • Upgrades necessary to keep up with growing luminosity • Detectors: Preshower, EM timing (H. Frisch) • Triggers and DAQ • COT(Drift Chamber) TDC - H. Frisch • Level-1 COT Track Trigger • Level-2 Silicon Vertex Trigger - M. Shochet + YKK • Level-2 Decision - M. Shochet + YKK • Level-3 Trigger • Event Builder Strength of Chicago group is that we are all focused on success of CDF. NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  6. Level-2 Decision Upgrade • Trigger Rates: • Level 1 output ~ 25kHz • Level 2 output ~ 300 Hz • Level 3 output ~ 60 Hz • Level 2 critical to CDF trigger performance • rejection factor ~ 100 • Major upgrade to Level-2 Decision is being commissioned. • will be used as CDF “real” triggers starting March 2005. NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  7. Level-2 Decision Upgrade • Primary purpose - faster, modular, more flexible, more robust • Present: • One PC Board for every interface (6 kinds) - maintenance issues • Custom processor (alpha) + backplane (1990 technology) - slow • Chicago has played major role since conception. • Henry Frisch was instrumental in proposing the upgrade. • T. Liu (Fermilab) led the whole effort: Chicago, Fermilab, Penn,Helsinki • Chicago engineers (with T. Liu) designed and built boards (Pulsar: Pulser And Recorder) • Harold Sanders, Mircea Bogdan • Chicago Personnel (firmware design, simulation, commissioning, …) • Vadim Rusu (Fermi Fellow) • a leading postdoc for the full system and essentially 100%. • Wojtek Fedorko (grad. student) • Shawn Kwang (Shochet’s grad. student) NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  8. Level-2 Decision Upgrade Overview PC Pulsar pre-processors Central Trigger Distribution Muon L1 Muon L1 Tracks L1 Trigger decsion Merger Kwang SLINK L2toTS Cluster L2 CALO (Cluster/ IsoCluster) E Sums Rusu Fedorko SVT e, m, t, g, jet, missing Et, displaced track,…. Triggers formed by combinations in 10-30 ms Shower Max Merger Electron SVT All boards identical FPGAs reprogrammed for each system NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  9. Level-2 Decision Upgrade: Current Status • Full system installed • Muon board fully integrated into Level-2 decision. • Parasitic running until February for other boards. • Original schedule for installation was Summer 05 - well ahead of schedule NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  10. Responsibilities for Level-2 Trigger • Chicago group will have continuing responsibilities for CDF Level-2 trigger, especially as luminosity grows. • Responsible for • Firmware and trigger simulation • Operations • Monitoring the performances • Monitoring program: • Initiated and designed by V. Rusu • Collaborative effort: Rusu, Fedorko, Kwang with Penn, Fermilab. • Monitoring at board level and system level • Invaluable tool for commissioning and testing in beam NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  11. YKK Group’s Physics Program Top Mass SUSY Searches Bs Mixing NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  12. Initial Analyses (warm-up) on Run II Data (72 pb-1) • W, Z cross sections • PRL accepted, PRD under Collaboration’s review • Primary authors include G. Veramendi, YKK • Forward-Backward Asymmetry using e+e- events • PRD submitted • G. Veramendi (UCB Ph.D. 2003), A. Gibson, YKK, G. Lentdecker NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  13. Top Mass and Electroweak Symmetry Breaking • Worked on Precision Meas.s of MW and Mtop • Run Ia, Ib: W Mass • Run II: Top Mass • Top Mass: • Prior to co-spokesperson’s term, YKK was Top mass group co-leader • Pursuing two methods in lepton+jets channel • Template method • Use mass shapes generated by MC • Fit shapes to 0B, 1B, 2B-tagged events • Matrix Element method (A. Gibson’s Thesis) • Evaluate likelihood that event kinematics are top like NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  14. Top Mass (l+jets) - Template Method First Results: Summer 03 (B tags) 108 pb-1 UCB: E. Brubaker, A. Gibson Chicago: U.K. Yang, YKK Toronto: J.-F. Arguin, P. Sinervo May 2004 (B tags) 162 pb-1 E. Brubaker’s thesis (UCB Ph.D. 2004) Chicago: J. Adelman, U.K. Yang, M. Shochet, YKK Toronto: J.-F. Arguin, P. Sinervo August 2004 (0 + 1 + 2-B tags) 162 pb-1 Chicago: J. Adelman, E. Brubaker, U.K. Yang, M. Shochet, YKK with Toronto, Dubna, Fermilab 174.9 +7.1-7.7 (stat) ± 6.5 (syst) GeV NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  15. Top Mass - Template Method (Aug. 2004) Mtop = 177.2 +6.0-5.5 (stat) ± 7.1 (syst) GeV NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  16. Top Mass - Template Method (Publication) • Higher statistics (305 pb-1) • Much smaller uncertainty in jet energy scale (x2) - better understanding • calorimeter simulation (Undergrad: D. Hoffman - pion responses) • Detector (Undergrad: A. Malkus, UCB grad: A. Gibson - g-jet balance studies) • method in estimating uncertainties PRD draft written - being reviewed by godparent committee. The numbers and figures will be finalized in a few months. Un-Ki Yang is leading this effort. NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  17. SUSY Searches Expected # of events w/ 400 pb-1 by A. Malkus Mc = 60 GeV 100 GeV 150 GeV • Signature based search using like-sign dilepton • Include trilepton events (Chargino-Neutralino) - flagship analysis for discovering SUSY at Tevatron • V. Rusu with Penn and Fermilab • Results by Spring conferences • Stop searches • 2 photons + 2 jets + missing Et • A. Malkus(undergrad), YKK, with Liverpool • APS/DPF abstract submitted NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  18. Bs Mixing World limit: Dms > 14.4 ps-1 SM pred. (99% prob.): 15 < Dms < 27 ps-1 • Fully reconstructed Bs (all hadrons) • provide the greatest reach in Dms (Boost is known) • triggered by SVT • unique to CDF due to SVT and high bandwidth triggers NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  19. Bs and SVT Upgrade Ivan Furic (Fermi Fellow - started April 2004) Co-convener of B physics working group (BPAK). BPAK responsibilities tool development group for Bs mixing ++ Particle ID tools: TOF, dE/dx Tracking evaluation: L00, event primary vertex Review and bless common tools in analyses Foster development and evaluation of new & improved triggers (large effort) Clarisse Kim (Grad. Student - starting June 2005) Edmund Barry (Undergrad. - started Dec. 2004) Ultimate goal: Bs mixing SVT upgrade work by I. Furic (~50%) and E. Barry - see M. Shochet’s talk Data Analysis Goals by this Spring Done: Reconstructed Bs, B0, B± Dp signals Measured relative decay rates PRL under collaboration’s review Ongoing work: Measuring B0, B± lifetimes Measuring Bd mixing First Bs mixing limit for spring conferences NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  20. Hadronic B0, B±, Bs Decays to Dp (with MIT, INFN Padova) • First observation with large statistics • Understanding of spectrum composition, trigger modeling necessary for Bs lifetimes, mixing • Measure ratios of branching fractions First measurements (PRL draft under collab.’s review) Br(Bs Dsp) / Br(B0 D-p) = 1.38 ± 0.19 (stat.) ± 0.10 (syst.) ± 0.36 (Br) ± 0.10 (PR) Br(B+ D0p) / Br(B0 D-p) = 1.95 ± 0.10 (stat.) ± 0.14 (syst.) ± 0.14 (Br) Bs Dsp B0 D+p- NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  21. Towards Bs Mixing: B0, B± Lifetimes (with MIT, Cantabria) • Simultaneous unbinned likelihood fit for mass and lifetime • Difficulty: trigger and analysis selection sculpt ct distribution • Lifetime fits for B±, B0 lifetime in good agreement with world average B0 K+ppp ct (B0) = 454.4 ± 10.3(stat.) mm (PDG: 460.5 ± 4.2 mm) ct (B+) = 519.5 ± 12.7(stat.) mm (PDG: 501 ± 5 mm) NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  22. Towards Bs Mixing: Bd Mixing Measurement Bd (with MIT, Cantabria) • Add tagging information to lifetime distribution (SST tagger) • Fit for Bd mixing Dmd agrees with world average. Dmd = 0.59 ± 0.07(stat) ps-1 (PDG: 0.59 ± 0.07 ps-1) • Next step for Bs mixing: test fitter, calibrate taggers • Expected Bs mixing sensitivity by this spring (hadronic modes only): • 95% CL at Dms > 10 ps-1 (pessimistic), Dms > 20 ps-1 (optimistic) NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

  23. Conclusion • Collider program has high potential for major discovery.. • Important to harvest results from previous large investment in CDF. • ~10% of luminosity so far - strong support over next 4 years critical. • Chicago group continues leadership role in CDF • hardware, physics, management • Quality and impact of group (post-docs and students) is very high. • Faculty actively engaged - important for CDF’s success. • Leads several high-profile analyses. • YKK group active in fundamental physics measurements • Top mass • Bs mixing • SUSY Chargino-Neutralino • YKK co-spokesperson through June 2006. • Planning to move to ATLAS after CDF spokesperson’s term ends. NSF Site visit, Jan. 14-15, 2005 Young-Kee Kim, University of Chicago

More Related