1 / 116

Improving Student Success, Pre-K Through College

Improving Student Success, Pre-K Through College. Indiana Education Roundtable Indianapolis, IN September, 2005. First, some good news. After more than a decade of stagnant or growing gaps, we appear to be turning the corner.

lyneth
Télécharger la présentation

Improving Student Success, Pre-K Through College

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving Student Success, Pre-K Through College Indiana Education Roundtable Indianapolis, IN September, 2005

  2. First, some good news. After more than a decade of stagnant or growing gaps, we appear to be turning the corner.

  3. NAEP Reading, 9 Year-Olds:Record Performance for All Groups

  4. African American-White Gap Narrows to Smallest Size in HistoryNAEP Reading, 9 Year-Olds 26 35 29

  5. Latino-White Gap Narrows to Smallest Size in HistoryNAEP Reading, 9 Year-Olds 21 28 24

  6. NAEP Math, 9 Year-Olds: Record Performance for All Groups

  7. African American-White Gap Narrows to Smallest Size in HistoryNAEP Math, 9 Year-Olds 23 28 25

  8. Latino-White Gap Narrows to Smallest Size in HistoryNAEP Math, 9 Year-Olds 17 26 21

  9. NAEP Reading, 13 Year-Olds

  10. NAEP Math, 13 Year-Olds:Increases and Record Performance for All Groups

  11. Bottom Line:When We Really Focus on Something, We Make Progress

  12. Clearly, much more remains to be done in elementary and middle school Too many youngsters still enter high school way behind.

  13. Where Are We Now?8th Grade Reading All Students 2003 Source: USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Summary Data Tables

  14. By Race, Ethnicity NAEP 8th Grade Reading 2003 Source: USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

  15. By Family Income NAEP 8th Grade Reading 2003 Source: USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

  16. Where Are We Now?8th Grade Math All Students 2003 Source: USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Summary Data Tables

  17. By Race, Ethnicity NAEP 8th Grade Math 2003 Source: USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

  18. By Family Income NAEP 8th Grade Math 2003 Source: USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

  19. But at least we have some traction on these problems.

  20. The Same is NOTTrue of High School

  21. High School

  22. High School Achievement: Math and Science: NAEP Long-Term Trends Source: NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress.

  23. HIGH SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT: READING AND WRITINGNAEP Long-Term Trends

  24. NAEP Reading, 17 Year-Olds 21 29

  25. NAEP Math, 17 Year-Olds 28 20

  26. Value Added in High School Declined During the Nineties

  27. Value Added Declining in High School Math... Age 13-17 Growth Source: NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress

  28. …Still Age 13-17 Growth Source: Main NAEP 1996, 2000

  29. Reading: Students Entering Better Prepared, But Leaving Worse Source: NAEP 1996 Trends in Academic Progress

  30. Hormones?

  31. Students in Other Countries Gain far More in High School

  32. TIMSS

  33. Source: NCES 1999-081R, Highlights From TIMSS

  34. Source: NCES 1999-081R, Highlights From TIMSS

  35. PISA

  36. US 15 Year-Olds Rank Near Middle Of The Pack Among 32 Participating Countries: 1999

  37. 2003: U.S. Ranked 24th out of 29 OECD Countries in Mathematics Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data available at http://www.oecd.org/

  38. Problems are not limited to our high-poverty and high-minority schools . . .

  39. U.S. Ranks Low in the Percent of Students in the Highest Achievement Level (Level 6) in Math Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data available at http://www.oecd.org/

  40. U.S. Ranks 23rd out of 29 OECD Countries in the Math Achievement of the Highest-Performing Students* * Students at the 95th Percentile Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data available at http://www.oecd.org/

  41. U.S. Ranks 23rd out of 29OECD Countries in the Math Achievement of High-SES Students Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data available at http://www.oecd.org/

  42. One measure on which we rank high?Inequality!

  43. Performance Of U.S.15 Year-Olds Highly Variable *Of 27 OECD countries Source: OECD, Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results From PISA 2000, 2001.

  44. These gaps begin before children arrive at the schoolhouse door. But, rather than organizing our educational system to ameliorate this problem, we organize it to exacerbate the problem.

  45. By the end of high school?

  46. African American and Latino 17 Year Olds Do Math at Same Levels As White 13 Year Olds Source: NAEP 1999 Long Term Trends Summary Tables (online)

  47. African American and Latino 17 Year Olds Read at Same Levels as White 13 Year Olds Source: Source: NAEP 1999 Long Term Trends Summary Tables (online)

  48. These patterns are reflected, too, in high school completion, college entry and college graduation rates.

  49. Students Graduate From High School At Different Rates, 2001** 4-Year Graduation Rates Source: Jay P. Greene and Greg Forster, “Public High School Graduation and College Readiness Rates in the United States,” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, September 2003.

  50. ADD IT ALL UP...

More Related