1 / 36

New Middle School Geneva, Il

New Middle School Geneva, Il. Greg Kemerer AE Senior Thesis 2006 – CM Option. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3. Background -Building, project, and site information Analyses -In depth discussion of each analysis Questions -A little Q & A. Presentation Outline. Background

lyneth
Télécharger la présentation

New Middle School Geneva, Il

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Middle SchoolGeneva, Il Greg Kemerer AE Senior Thesis 2006 – CM Option

  2. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Background -Building, project, and site information Analyses -In depth discussion of each analysis Questions -A little Q & A Presentation Outline

  3. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Background

  4. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Owner Information Currently overseeing: 5 elementary schools 1 middle school 1 high school Chief concerns: space, cost, durability, safety, schedule

  5. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 The Building

  6. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 The Building Size: 196,000 sq ft Construction: 5/16/05 – 8/29/06 Hard Cost: $28,800,000 Delivery Method: Design-big-build, CM Agent

  7. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 The Team Owner: Geneva Community Unit School District #304 Architect: Larson and Darby Group Construction Manager: Bovis Lend Lease Consultants: Rempe-Sharpe and KJWW

  8. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 The Systems Mechanical HVAC: (2) 300 ton air cooled chillers, 6 AHUs, dust control system Heating: 2-pipe heated water system, (2) 250 BHP boilers, individual fan coil units throughout Additional Heating: 2,340 linear feet of radiant ceiling panels

  9. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 The Systems Electrical Supply: 2732 KVA 480/277 line Main Distribution: 4,000 A, 480/277, 3 Phase Transformers: (2) 500 KVA, (1) 225 KVA Generator: 250 KVA, 480/277, cross-linked to existing middle school Fire Protection 4 zone, wet system smoke detectors and alarms

  10. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 The Systems Structural Unit A/C: Single story. 12” CMU load bearing masonry on concrete strip footings Unit B: Two story. Structural steel with combination architectural precast and face brick. Flooring is 12” hollow core precase with 3” poured slab topping. Basement utilizes step footings to match CMU coursings.

  11. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 The Site Plan

  12. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 1 Interior Wall System, Building B

  13. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Intent Building B Interior Wall Type Burnished face CMU durable, attractive, high fire rating expensive, heavy, coordination issues Metal stud wall lightweight, inexpensive, fewer coordination issues less durable, thermal bridging, sound transmission

  14. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Methods Wall takeoff Calculate unit weight of different wall types Calculate total weight difference Re-size structural steel members Calculate cost savings for steel and new wall type

  15. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Weight Savings Existing System: 1,050,742 lbs Stud Wall System: 128,848 lbs Savings: 921,894 lbs Total Difference of 461 Tons -or- 18.43 psf of dead load

  16. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Structural Steel

  17. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Cost Impact

  18. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Cost Impact

  19. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Conclusion Use Metal Stud Wall System

  20. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 2 Exterior Wall System, Building B

  21. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Intent Building B Exterior Wall Type 8” CMU, 3” rigid foam insulation, face brick Alternative Systems Tilt-up concrete with Nitterhouse brick façade Precast concrete with face brick Smith Midland Slenderwall

  22. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Tilt-up Problem

  23. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Cost & Schedule Impact

  24. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Energy Impact

  25. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Energy Impact

  26. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Energy Impact

  27. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Energy Cost Impact

  28. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Conclusion Stay With Initial Wall System

  29. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 3 Obstacles to Building Green Schools

  30. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Intent To better understand why more schools aren’t being built green and find the obstacles that are allowing this to happen Benefits: Reduced Energy Bills Smaller Environmental Impact Better Student Performance

  31. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Methods Online research Phone interviews More phone interviews

  32. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 The Way Schools Build Funding from tax dollars or referendum Community Involvement referendum, forum, SC had no requirement projects were at various states or preparation Hired Outside Architects Geneva had an in-house architect

  33. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Findings Schools and districts generally unaware of benefits of green design. Also unaware of government green incentive programs. Architects always suggested the green design had to do “some convincing” Non-Green Schools various excuses insisted green was still on their minds

  34. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Conclusion No green buildings without green design Owner and community education Government incentives

  35. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3

  36. Background Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Questions ?

More Related