html5-img
1 / 23

High Performance Leadership

High Performance Leadership. Core Concepts. Read any good headlines lately?. How has the business environment changed in the past 5 years?. 2005. 2010. 2015 ?. At table groups...brainstorm 5 changes. The year was 2005. MySpace had 60 million users vs. ~6 million for Facebook.

macy
Télécharger la présentation

High Performance Leadership

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. High Performance Leadership Core Concepts

  2. Read any good headlines lately? • How has the business environment changed in the past 5 years? 2005 2010 2015 ? At table groups...brainstorm 5 changes

  3. The year was 2005 MySpace had 60 million users vs. ~6 million for Facebook. Gas was $2.37 600mm “albums/cds” were sold Twitter did not exist Taylor Swift had not released an album Lady Antebellum did not exist Barack Obama was a State Senator in Illinois itunes sold it’s 600millionth download history to date Leading brands included Blockbuster, Borders, Circuit City, Hummer, Pontiac, Washington Mutual, Lehman Brothers. Facebook has 410 million users vs. 100 million for MySpace. Gas is.... 326mm “albums/cds” were sold 1 billion tweets per month Well, you know Well, you know Well, you know Itunes sold 300mm downloads in 1 month All these brands went bankrupt, etc., etc. 2005 2010

  4. Was leadership a factor in the “great recession?” Kerry Killinger WaMu Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide Philip Schoonover Circuit City Dick Fuld Lehman Rick Wagoner GM Hank Greenberg AIG

  5. The world has changed…a lot complex dynamic hostile A challenging environment simple stable comfortable

  6. Therefore, LEADERS need to behave differently Traditional Leadership Paradigms Modern Leadership Paradigms At table groups...brainstorm 5 differences

  7. Organizations need to behave differently. Modern organizations External focus Collaboration Inspiration Innovative change Flexibility Complex jobs, high skill levels Traditional organizations Internal focus Silo mentality Command & Control Incremental Change Standardization Simple jobs, low skill levels

  8. Leadership and Business Performance Research has shown that organizations with highly engaged employees have 5-times higher average 5-year total shareholder return and diluted earnings per share.

  9. Leadership Effectiveness impact on Employee Engagement Source: Kenexa Research Institute, 2010 When employees report they follow effective leaders, the average employee engagement score is 91% compared to 17% for employees who report neutral or inneffective leaders.

  10. Leadership Effectiveness and current business results diluted earnings per share (DEPS) Those organizations scoring in the top 25% of leadership effectiveness realized a 5.7 times greater DEPS in the following year than organizations scoring in the bottom 25%. Know the way Source: Kenexa Research Institute, 2010

  11. Leadership Effectiveness and long-term business results Organisations that were in the top 25% of the leadership effectiveness attained seven times greater three-year TSR (Total Shareholder Return) than those in the bottom 25%. Know the way Source: Kenexa Research Institute, 2010

  12. Leadership Effectiveness drivers Know the way High impact development The two most significant development opportunities for leaders are building trustand two-way communication that is perceived as open and honest

  13. All Roads Point to Leadership

  14. Which organizations win in dynamic environments? Performance Time

  15. Research project undertaken by London Business Schooland Princeton… • 1500 Matched Pair Studies: • Globally • Across industry • To answer: how are leaders in high performing organizations behaving differently? Research Background Simple Stable Comfortable Complex Dynamic Challenging P E R F O R M A N C E 40% LEADERSHIPCONTRIBUTION 5% LEADERSHIPCONTRIBUTION 16

  16. Are leaders born, or made? Primarily Innate • Personality Traits • Motivations • Cognitive Ability 33% Primarily Learned 67% • Behaviors, Skills, Capabilities • Functional Knowledge, Business Acumen • Situational Judgment At table groups...guess the percent of each

  17. How Leaders (really) Learn 70% Lessons of experience from on the job and from best practice examples. 20% Role models, good and bad. 10% Traditional training.

  18. The Four Clusters of High Performance Behaviors 67%

  19. Effective leadership behaviors for dynamic environments Think Develop Inspire Achieve • Information Search • Concept Formation • Conceptual Flexibility • Empathy • Teamwork • Developing People • Influence • Building Confidence • Presentation • Proactivity • ContinuousImprovement • Customer Focus At table groups...guess which score in top 3 and bottom 3

  20. LEADING TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATIONS CREATING & LEADING HIGH PERFORMANCE ORGANIZATIONS Behavior Profile Benchmark Data High Performance Benchmark

  21. The ELE curriculum is built around the 4 High Performance Behavior Clusters

  22. Let’s go have dinner!

More Related