1 / 7

sTLD RFP: Status

sTLD RFP: Status. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil March 24, 2003 Stuart Lynn. Board Action. Amsterdam, December 2002 Three-part resolution Launch new TLD evaluation 12 criticality 1 questions Retained contract services Seek GNSO advice re top level namespace Structure or not? May, 2003

maddy
Télécharger la présentation

sTLD RFP: Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. sTLD RFP: Status Rio de Janeiro, Brazil March 24, 2003 Stuart Lynn

  2. Board Action • Amsterdam, December 2002 • Three-part resolution • Launch new TLD evaluation • 12 criticality 1 questions • Retained contract services • Seek GNSO advice re top level namespace • Structure or not? • May, 2003 • Prerequisite to moving forward • Require President to develop RFP for Board approval • A “few” new sponsored TLDs • Extension of “Proof of Concept” • Far fewer issues • Slow going as predicted

  3. A “Few” Sponsored TLDs • Draft methodology & evaluation criteria posted today • http://www.icann.org/riodejaneiro/stld-rfp-topic.htm • Linked from meeting agenda page • For community comment • RFP for board approval in 4 - 6 weeks • Report posted on existing sTLD registrants conformance to charters • http://www.icann.org/committees/ntepptf/stld-compliance-report-25feb03.htm • Linked from meeting agenda page

  4. Draft Methodology & Evaluation • Definition of sponsored TLD • Overview of proposed RFP Process • Draft Selection Criteria • Proposed Criteria Evaluation Methodology • Weights and scores • Outline Proposal Evaluation Methodology • Multiple evaluation teams

  5. Sponsored TLD • Limited to registrants from defined community • Including members of sponsoring organization • Scope of activity, registrations be defined by limited charter • Delegated policy responsibility • Open & transparent governance • Members influence policy • Adhere to applicable ICANN policies

  6. Draft Selection Criteria • Ensure stable registry operation • Technical requirements • Business continuity requirement • Conform to requirements of sponsored TLD • Add new value to DNS • Broad value of name • Enhanced diversity of DNS • Reach & enrich broad global communities • Demographic reach • Global reach & accessibility • Level of community support • Respect rights of others • Charter compliance • Dispute resolution process • Whois service

  7. Questions?

More Related