1 / 15

|f(q 2 )| 2

Importance of Charm Semileptonic Decays. |V CKM | 2. |f(q 2 )| 2. l. l. B. B. n. n. p. p. V ub. b. Assuming theoretical form factors  V cs and V cd. 1. Assuming V cs and V cd known, we can check theoretical calculations of the form factors. 2.

maja
Télécharger la présentation

|f(q 2 )| 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Importance ofCharm Semileptonic Decays |VCKM|2 |f(q2)|2 l l B B n n p p Vub b Assuming theoretical form factors Vcs and Vcd 1 Assuming Vcs and Vcd known, we can check theoretical calculations of the form factors 2 Potentially useful input to Vub from exclusive B semileptonic decays 3 (summer 2008) 11- 17% e.g. HPQCD &FNAL Related at same invariant 4 velocity HQS D

  2. Form factor measures probability hadron will be formed S/N ~40/1 S/N ~300/1 FNAL-MILC-HPQCD PRL 94, 011601 (2005), and arXiv:0906.2498 [hep-lat]. • Binned likelihood fits to U distributions are performed in each q2 bin and each tag mode Modified pole model used for comparison Shape: experiments compatible with LQCD. Normalization: experiments (1.2% for K-eν and 2.0% for π-eν) consistent with LQCD (10%). LQCD precision lags arXiv:0906.2983 (accepted PRD Jul 22 2009)

  3. arXiv:0906.2983 (accepted PRD Jul 22 2009) |Vcs| & |Vcd| Results CLEO-c: the most precise direct determination of Vcs * CLEO-c: νN remains most precise determination (for now) Fits use Becher-Hill z-expansion * PDG2000

  4. arXiv:0906.2983 (accepted PRD Jul 22 2009) |Vcs| & |Vcd| Results THEORY UNCERTAINITY REMOVED CLEO-c: the most precise direct determination of Vcs * CLEO-c: νN remains most precise determination (for now) LQCD form factors with improved precision are eagerly awaited * PDG2000

  5. Unitarity Test: Compatibility of charm & beauty sectors of CKM matrix? CLEO-c full data set + 3-4% theory uncertainties CLEO-c Now arXiv:0906.2983 (accepted PRD Jul 22 2009) + D semileptonic decays with comparable theory and experimental uncertainty may lead to interesting competition between direct and indirect constraints We eagerly await new precise lattice calculations Plots by Sebastien Descortes-Genon & Ian Shipsey See also talk by Descotres-Genon at joint BABAR-Belle-BESIII-CLEO-c Workshop 11/07, Beijing

  6. Form Factors in D → ρeν Interest: 1st measurement of FF in Cabibbo suppressed charm P V decays + cos  q2 Grinstein & Pirjol [hep-ph/0404250] D+ 281pb-1  cos e Line is projection for fitted RV, R2 D0 B(D0 -e+)= (1.560.160.09)10-3 B(D+ 0e+)= (2.320.200.12) 10-3 Isospin average: G(D0  r-e+n) = (0.410.030.02)10-2 ps-1 Fixed background shape and signal tails from MC 281pb-1 Simultaneous fit to D+ 0e , D0 -e Rv = 1.40  0.25  0.03 R2 = 0.57  0.18  0.06 PRELIMINARY Update to full data set soon

  7. Explanations of the plots

  8. S/N ~40/1 S/N ~300/1

  9. FNAL-MILC-HPQCD PRL 94, 011601 (2005), and arXiv:0906.2498 [hep-lat]. Modified pole model used for comparison

  10. * Fits use Becher-Hill z-expansion * PDG2000

  11. THEORY UNCERTAINITY REMOVED * * PDG2000

  12. CLEO-c full data set + 3-4% theory uncertainties CLEO-c Now arXiv:0906.2983 (accepted PRD Jul 22 2009) These plots were made by Sebastien Descortes-Genon and Ian Shipsey. In this |Vcs| vs. |Vcd| 2D plane, light blue shows the 95% C.L. limit set by indirect determinations from Kaon and neutrino experiments. Green shows the limit set by indirect determinations from B physics. The yellow area is obtained by combining the indirect determinations. The cross shows the central values determined using the CLEO-c full dataset, with the orange ellipse showing the current 95% C.L. limit set by CLEO-c and red ellipse showing the limit if theory uncertainties can be reduced to 3-4%. The CLEO-c analysis is a direct determination. + Plots by Sebastien Descortes-Genon & Ian Shipsey See also talk by Descotres-Genon at joint BABAR-Belle-BESIII-CLEO-c Workshop 11/07, Beijing

  13. D+ 281pb-1 D0 Fixed background shape and signal tails from MC 281pb-1

  14. cos  q2  cos e Line is projection for fitted RV, R2

More Related