1 / 15

Public Transportation at the State Level

Public Transportation at the State Level. Regulation and Coordination By Moaz Yusuf Ahmad. Challenges faced in Selangor. Emphasis on car travel (often single-occupancy) in Malaysia (status symbol) Limited investment in public transit/transport

makaio
Télécharger la présentation

Public Transportation at the State Level

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Public Transportation at the State Level Regulation and Coordination By Moaz Yusuf Ahmad

  2. Challenges faced in Selangor • Emphasis on car travel (often single-occupancy) in Malaysia (status symbol) • Limited investment in public transit/transport • Mainly suburban and exurban communities with large population • Communities usually surrounded by expressways and divided by wide “express-roads” • Trip generators are often separated from each other  discourages public transport  encourages car use

  3. Challenges faced in Selangor • High traffic volume and incomplete roads (creates gridlock within existing road system) • Older, high density urban areas not designed for large volumes of automobile traffic • Klang • Petaling Jaya • Failure of existing infrastructure or costly maintenance (MRRII flyover, Klang bridges) • Cannot keep pace with development

  4. What about a Public Transport solution? • Public Transport is often mentioned as a solution for existing challenges • However, it faces the following problems: • Lack of strategic development planning makes public transport tough to implement • A project may be supported initially but interest drops afterwards • “Impian LRT” encourages the introduction of costly elevated LRT/Monorail megaprojects over minor, community-centred projects

  5. Improving our Quality of Life • Reduce traffic volume and bottlenecks • Reduce congestion, delays, vehicle idling, and air pollution • Build safer communities focused on people • Shift from single-occupancy vehicle travel to multiple-occupancy (carpooling) • Develop faster, more reliable public transit • Encourage greater use of public transit

  6. The Role of the Government • Poor oversight and organization have created a crisis in public transportation (e.g. Komuter) • The government must take the responsibility to regulate, organize, and coordinate public transport services within Selangor: • Bipartisan Assembly Committee for the regulation and oversight of public transportation • Local Public Transport Authority (LPTA) for strategic planning, implementation, enforcement

  7. Public Transportation at the State Level

  8. “Quick Wins” Part 1Improve Community Transport • Investing in Community-Based Transport • Coordinate town shuttle services under LPTA • Routes should have 2-way service with minimum frequency of 15 minutes • ‘Clockface’ service demonstrates reliability • 2-way service means shorter trips • State government funding of capital costs • approx. RM250k-300k per 12m bus • Operating costs paid by/through local councils • Advertising + state subsidy will support operations

  9. “Quick Wins” Part 2Improve Minibus service • Minibus service can enhance communities by improving accessibility and mobility • Hong Kong has two types of Minibus services • Green Minibus • Government-controlled feeder bus service • Uses fixed routes, regulated fares • Red ‘Maxicab’ • Privately operated ‘point-to-point’ service • Uses flexible routes, market fares

  10. “Quick Wins” Part 3 Improve rapid transit • Direct express bus routes and feeder bus routes to link communities to KTM lines • Encourages passenger demand to develop • Greater cost recovery = lower subsidy • Build new station on Kelana Jaya LRT line at existing Lembah Subang Depot • Guideway, tracks and station already in place • Reduces pressure on Kelana Jaya station and existing bus routes, roads • Allows the use of bus routes to promote demand

  11. Restricted bus Right-of-Way Orange Line, Los Angeles, CA (USA) TransJakarta, Jakarta (Indonesia)

  12. Benefits of “Quick Wins” • Immediate need for public transportation improvements  oil, petrol, food prices and cost of living rapidly increasing • Faster planning and construction period means that the results can be seen quickly • Building public transportation at the local level will create demand for public transportation • Greater mobility for more people

  13. Conclusion • Traffic congestion is causing significant economic and social problems for communities in Selangor • Solutions must allow various options for residents • Planning must include transit options, mixed-uses, higher densities  Transit-Oriented Developments • Government must identify and implement several “Quick Win” solutions to showcase ideas • Localized, community-based solutions are a lower cost way to build demand for public transport • Future investment will have better cost recovery

  14. Sources • National Physical Plan (Transportation) • Selangor 2020 Structural Plan • KL City, MPSJ Local Plans • Government of Hong Kong (Transportation) • RapidKL, Prasarana, KTM, Transjakarta • Urban Rail, Railway Technology forums • Skyscrapercity.com, usj.com.my, residents • Archived photos including personal collection

  15. Moaz Yusuf Ahmad 012-248-3330 SS17, Subang Jaya Moaz.ahmad@gmail.com moaz.a@taylors.edu.my Thank you for your Time

More Related