Analysis of HBr IR Values and Energy Levels: A Comparative Study
180 likes | 277 Vues
Explore differences in IR values of HBr, along with predictions and analysis of energy levels. Comparison of different hypotheses and results, suggesting insights into quantum states.
Analysis of HBr IR Values and Energy Levels: A Comparative Study
E N D
Presentation Transcript
IR analysis for HBr,E0,V(m+4),V(m+5) https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PPT-210912ak.ppt
C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables
Energy level C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables
https://notendur.hi.is//~jil3/work/HBr/H+%20HBr+%20Intensity%20ratio.pdfhttps://notendur.hi.is//~jil3/work/HBr/H+%20HBr+%20Intensity%20ratio.pdf
IR values: C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xlshttps://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xlshttps://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp
D1(z-axis/out of plane axis) Points for 0 < D1 < 0.001 -for W2 £ W3 Points for Above (AK analysi) https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912aka.pxp; Lay: 1, Gr:0
W2=49.8, W3=87.7: Points for Above (JL analysis) https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912aka.pxp; Lay: 1, Gr:0
The difference between AK and JL could be because of differen initial Values for WL and WH(?)
This suggests that WL & WH are high (ca. WL=50, WH = 88) i.e. chisq lowers as WL and WH increase and that g >0 (g error < g value) https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls
Now let´s look at E(J´) and dE(J´) for the V states: See slides 2 and 3 above.
DE(J´) This turns out to be no better! DE(J´) (V(m+5)) ? Guess DE(J´) (V(m+5)) Predictions by JL DE(J´) (V(m+4)) J´=7: 273 instead of 266 J´=8: 250 instead of 235 J´=9: 230 instead of 200 ? J´ https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0
DE(J´) DE(J´) (V(m+5)) ? ? DE(J´) (V(m+5)) Predictions by JL DE(J´) (V(m+4)) J´ https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0
DE(J´) J´=7: 243 instead of 266 J´=8: 196 instead of 235 J´=9: 145 instead of 200 DE(J´) (V(m+5)) ? ? DE(J´) (V(m+5)) Predictions by JL DE(J´) (V(m+4)) Guess For testing This turns out to be no better! J´ https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0
DE(J´,J´-1) DE(J´,J´-1) V(m+4) DE(J´,J´-1) V(m+5) J´ https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:2, Gr:1