890 likes | 1.01k Vues
This paper explores the critical aspects of clock synchronization in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), highlighting the importance of accurate time synchronization for efficient operations such as duty cycling, localization, and data fusion. We present various methodologies for estimating clock parameters, including sender-receiver and receiver-receiver protocols. Best practices for minimum variance unbiased estimation and minimum mean square error estimation are discussed. The findings emphasize the need for effective synchronization strategies to address challenges posed by energy constraints and dynamic network topologies.
E N D
Estimation of Clock Parameters and Performance Benchmarks for Synchronization in Wireless Sensor Networks Qasim M. Chaudhari and Dr. Erchin Serpedin Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Outline • Wireless sensor networks • Related work • Clock model • A Sender-Receiver protocol • Clock offset estimation • Clock offset and skew estimation • Simplified schemes • Best Linear Unbiased Estimation – Order Statistics • Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimation • Minimum Mean Square Error estimation
Clock synchronization of inactive nodes • Clock offset and skew estimation in a Receiver-Receiver protocol • Conclusions • Future research directions
Wireless Sensor Networks S Server S Internet S Source D Destination D Gateway Wireless Terminal
Introduction • Small scale sensor nodes • Limited power • Harsh environmental conditions • Communication failures • Node failures • Dynamic network topology • Mobility of nodes
Applications • Monitoring • Environment and habitat • Military surveillance • Security • Traffic • Controlling and tracking • Industrial processes • Fire Detection • Object tracking
Importance of time synchronization • Time synchronization in WSNs is important for • Efficient duty cycling • Localization and location-based monitoring • Data fusion • Distributed beamforming and target tracking • Security protocols • Network scheduling and routing, TDMA
Constraints • Limited hardware • Reduced computational power • Low memory • Limited energy • Communication vs. computation • RF energy required to transmit 1 bit over 100 meters is equivalent to execution of 3 million instructions [Pottie 00] • Traditional clock synchronization techniques • Communication comes for free • Computational resources are powerful • Examples: NTP is energy expensive, GPS is cost expensive
Related Work • Reference Broadcast Synchronization (RBS) [Elson 02] • Conventional receiver-receiver protocol • Reduces nondeterministic delays • Conserves energy via post facto synchronization • Timing synch Protocol for Sensor Networks (TPSN) [Ganeriwal 03] • Conventional sender-receiver protocol • Two operational phases: Level Discovery and Synchronization • Time Diffusion Protocol (TDP) [Su 05] • Achieves a network-wide equilibrium time using an iterative, weighted averaging technique based on diffusion of timing messages
Related Work • Analysis of a sender-receiver model [Ghaffar 02] • For known fixed delays, maximum likelihood estimator for clock offset does not exist • Five algorithms: median round delay, minimum round delay, minimum link delay, median phase, average phase. • Minimum link delay algorithm has the lowest variance • Maximum likelihood clock offset estimator for unknown fixed delays [Jeske 05]
Clock Model • A computer clock consists of two components • Frequency source • Means of accumulating timing events • Practical clocks are set with limited precision • Frequency sources run at slightly different rates • Frequency of a crystal oscillator varies due to • Initial manufacturing tolerance • Temperature, pressure • Aging
Clock Model • A general clock model can be represented by • where is the clock offset, is the clock skew and is the clock drift • Clock synchronization problem • Given the logical clock for a node k in the network, then • is a function of • Target synchronization accuracy • Amount of energy the network is willing to pay
A Sender-Receiver Protocol Sources of error (time uncertainty) associated with message exchanges • Send time: time spent to construct a message • Access time: delays at MAC layer before actual transmission • Propagation time: time of flight from one node to another • Receive time: time needed for the receiver to receive the message and process it 2. Node B sends an ACK (Level of Node B, T1, T2, and T3) to Node A at T3. With this, Node A calculates the clock offset. 1. Node A sends a timing message (Level of Node A and T1) to Node B at T1.
Observations • Fixed clock offset model is not sufficient in practice • Clock skew correction results in long term synchronization and hence more energy savings • Network delays being asymmetric is a more realistic scenario • Even for the symmetric clock offset only model, better estimation schemes achieving are possible • Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimation (MVUE) • Minimum Mean Square Error Estimation (MMSE) • Lack of analytical performance bounds and metrics • Average RBS error: [Elson 02] or [Ganeriwal 03]?
Clock Offset Gaussian Noise Assumption • One motivation comes from experimental basis [Elson 02] • In case of unknown delay distribution, we can evoke Central Limit theorem • Example: for uniform delays, the sum of even two of them starts resembling a Gaussian curve
Clock Offset • The likelihood function can be written as • And the clock offset estimate and the CRLB are
Clock Offset Exponential Delay Assumption • Random delays often modeled as exponential • Several traces of delay measurements on Internet collected by [Moon 99] fitting an exponential distribution • Conformation of experimental observations with mathematical results • Experimental observations • Minimum link delay algorithm [Paxson 98] • Clock Filter algorithm in NTP [Mills 91] • Mathematical results • Best performance by Minimum link delay algorithm [Ghaffar 02] • ML estimate based on minimum order statistics [Jeske 05]
Clock Offset • Likelihood function is given as • ML clock offset estimate is • CRLB is derived as
Clock Offset and Skew Gaussian • Likelihood function with is • Joint ML estimate for clock offset is shown to be where
Clock Offset and SkewGaussian • And for the clock skew • Computationally quite complex • Fixed delay must be known • Open problem: Recursive implementation/update?
Clock Offset and SkewGaussian • Cramer-Rao Lower Bound is expressed as where • Proportional to clock skew squared • Not only dependent on number of synchronization messages but also on the synchronization period
Clock Offset and Skew Exponential • The likelihood function in this case is • Four different cases need to be considered
Clock Offset and SkewExponential Case I: known, known • Constraints • ML estimator
Clock Offset and SkewExponential Case II: known, unknown • Constraints • Lemma 1: lies on one of the following curves
Clock Offset and SkewExponential • Lemma 2: lies either on point A or to the left of it (B,C,…) • Lemma 3: To the left of A, boundary of support region is formed by a sequence of curves with decreasing slopes • Lemma 4: is unique and is given by one of
Clock Offset and SkewExponential Case III: unknown, known • Constraints
Clock Offset and SkewExponential • Lemma 5: Only two points satisfy the constraints • ML estimator has the closed-form expression
Clock Offset and SkewExponential Case IV: unknown, unknown • Constraints • Curves intersect on the line • Over this line, is constrained by
Clock Offset and SkewExponential • Problem can be solved by the application of four lemmas • Final form of the ML estimator is
Simplified Schemes • Fixed delay must be known in Gaussian case • Computational complexity • Further simplification within the same framework is possible suitable for WSNs in case • Synchronization accuracy constraints are not stringent • Energy conservation constraints are strict • One simple scheme is independent of delay distribution involved • Cost paid is slight degradation in estimation quality
Utilizing Data Samples 1,N • Better skew estimation for large synchronization period • Utilize only 1st and last sample differences for eliminating the clock offset • Define • Simplified new model where and are either Gaussian or Laplacian distributed depending on original delay distribution
Utilizing Data Samples 1,N Gaussian delays • Likelihood function for highly reduced data set is • ML-Like clock skew estimator is expressed as • CRLB-Like lower bound is • Depends on timestamping “distances”
Utilizing Data Samples 1,N Exponential delays • The reduced likelihood function is • ML-Like clock skew estimator can be derived as • CRLB-Like lower bound
Utilizing Data Samples 1,N • Simulation results
Two Minimum Order Statistics • Motivation • Unknown delay distribution • Small synchronization period • Opening the model equations as • Choose two points as
Two Minimum Order Statistics • Joint the two points to obtain the estimate through its slope and intercept • The form of the estimator is • Almost as simple as the clock offset only case • Knowledge of is not required
Two Minimum Order Statistics • Simulations results
Two Minimum Order Statistics • Computational complexity comparison with the MLE
Best Linear Unbiased Estimation – Order Statistics • Limited power resources in WSN implies better estimation techniques should be utilized • Results derived so far correspond to symmetric delays, although asymmetry is a more realistic scenario • Best Linear Unbiased Estimation (BLUE) is suboptimal in general due to linearity constraint • What if the linearity constraints are on the order statistics of observed data, instead of the raw observations?
Best Linear Unbiased Estimation – Order Statistics • Transforming the data as • Following relations hold for ordered data
Best Linear Unbiased Estimation – Order Statistics • The covariance matrix for can be derived as • Its inverse can be found by Gauss-Jordan elimination • Let the ordered observations be represented as