1 / 23

The European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme

The European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme. Performance, credibility, transparency . EMAS Workshop M. A. Barrecheguren. European Commission. DG ENV. G2 Bucharest, 25-26 June 2008. The European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme. Performance, credibility, transparency .

marc
Télécharger la présentation

The European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme Performance, credibility, transparency EMAS Workshop M. A. Barrecheguren. European Commission. DG ENV. G2 Bucharest, 25-26 June 2008

  2. The European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme Performance, credibility, transparency Differences & Links between ISO 14001 & EMAS M. A. Barrecheguren. European Commission. DG ENV. G2 Bucharest, 25-26 June 2008

  3. COMPATIBILITY OF EMAS WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS EMAS and ISO/EN ISO 14001 share the same objective: to provide good environmental management In 1996, the Commission recognised that ISO/EN ISO 14001 could become a steppingstone for EMAS The adoption of ISO/EN ISO 14001 as the management system element of EMAS allows your organisation to easily progress from ISO/EN ISO 14001 to EMAS without duplicating efforts

  4. While EMAS and ISO/EN ISO 14001 share the same objective, they are different in a number of ways These differences are illustrated in the nexts slides showing in particular where EMAS goes beyond the ISO/EN ISO 14001 requirements WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ISO/EN ISO 14001 AND EMAS?

  5. EMAS Under legal bases (EU Member States and EEA countries) Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council under public law ISO/EN ISO 14001 Under no legal bases (International: world wide) ISO standard under private law STATUS

  6. EMAS The entity to be registered shall not exceed the boundaries of the Member State and it is intended to go towards entities and sites ISO/EN ISO 14001 Does not go towards entities or sites ORGANISATIONS

  7. EMAS Includes commitment to continual improvement of environmental performance of the organisation ISO/EN ISO 14001 Does not include a commitment to the continual improvement of environmental performance but of the performance of the system ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

  8. EMAS Obligatory preliminary review, when it is the first time that the organisation sets its environmental status ISO/EN ISO 14001 Initial review is recommended, but not required INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

  9. EMAS Identification and evaluation of the environmental aspects (direct and indirect) Establishment of criteria for assessing the significance of the environmental aspects ISO/EN ISO 14001 Required only a procedure able to identify environmental aspects ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS

  10. EMAS Obligatory to demonstrate it Required full legal compliance, there is a compliance-audit ISO/EN ISO 14001 Only commitment to comply with applicable legal requirements. There is no compliance-audit LEGAL COMPLIANCE

  11. EMAS Open dialogue with the public Public Environmental Statement (validated for verifiers) ISO/EN ISO 14001 Not open dialogue with the public, only is required to respond to relevant communication from external interested parts Control by public is not possible EXTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS

  12. EMAS Required annual improvement ISO/EN ISO 14001 Required periodically improvement without a defined frequency CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT

  13. EMAS Is wider and requires an evaluation of the environmental performance of the organization, based in a performance-audit ISO/EN ISO 14001 Required an environmental performance in the management, but not through a performance audit MANAGEMENT REVIEW

  14. EMAS Required influence over contractors and suppliers ISO/EN ISO 14001 Relevant procedures are communicated to contractors and suppliers CONTRACTYORS & SUPPLIERS

  15. EMAS Active involvement of employees and their representatives ISO/EN ISO 14001 No EMPLOYEES INVOLVEMENT

  16. EMAS Includes: system-audit, a performance-audit (= evaluation of environmental performance) and an environmental compliance-audit (= determination of legal compliance) ISO/EN ISO 14001 Included only system audit against the requirements of the standard INTERNAL ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING

  17. EMAS Required the independence of the auditor ISO/EN ISO 14001 Advised the independence of the auditor AUDITOR

  18. EMAS Check for improvement of environmental performance. Frequency required: 3 year cycle during which all areas are verified at least once ISO/EN ISO 14001 Check environmental system performance No frequency required AUDITS

  19. EMAS Accredited environmental verifiers ISO/EN ISO 14001 No EXTERNAL VERIFICATION

  20. EMAS Verifiers accredited according to NACE codes ISO/EN ISO 14001 Certifiers accredited according to EAC code VERIFICATION/CERTIFICATION SCOPE

  21. EMAS Obligation by Validation of Environmental Statement ISO/EN ISO 14001 No obligation AUTHORITIES ARE INFORMED

  22. EMAS Yes ISO/EN ISO 14001 No LOGO

  23. Thank you for your attention M.A. Barrecheguren

More Related