1 / 21

KP CWG 17/18 Survey Results

KP CWG 17/18 Survey Results. Background. During the 2017/2018 school year, the KP Community Working Groups and the KP Administration developed surveys targeted at various stakeholder groups to gain insight into their views and priorities Surveys were released to the three stakeholder groups:

marcelam
Télécharger la présentation

KP CWG 17/18 Survey Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. KP CWG 17/18 Survey Results Background • During the 2017/2018 school year, the KP Community Working Groups and the KP Administration developed surveys targeted at various stakeholder groups to gain insight into their views and priorities • Surveys were released to the three stakeholder groups: • Community Members • King Philip Teachers and Staff • King Philip Students • Participation in the survey was excellent with good representation across the three towns and all demographics • This presentation highlights the major trends and outcomes from the survey

  2. Survey Participants We saw a high level of participation in the Community, Staff and Student surveys • 768 Respondents for the Community Survey • 463 parents of KP students completed the survey • 61% of our KP student population participated • 52% of the teachers and staff participated

  3. Understanding the Data The Stop-Light Scale was Used to Represent the Results Example • 75% strongly agree • 5% strongly disagree • Respondents responded with a 60% “performance” rating Performance Current performance rating

  4. KP CWG 17/18 Survey Results Areas of Success Areas of Improvement Areas or Concern Quality education Class Size Technology Teacher quality Funding Course variety Academic Challenge Discipline • Co-Extra Curricular • Athletics • Music • Clubs Teacher to Student Feedback Students connection to school and their peers/culture Safety

  5. Areas of Success Quality Education Teacher Quality Academic Challenge • Co-Extra Curricular • Athletics • Music • Clubs

  6. I Believe KP Provides a Quality Education The majority of respondents agree that KP students are getting a quality education • 75% of this population believes KP is providing a quality education • Former parents rated this significantly lower (59%) than current parents (73%) • Data aggregated community and staff respondents

  7. Teacher Quality & Retention/Academic Challenge KP gets high marks in the area of Teacher Quality & Academic Challenge, retention of Quality Teachers is a concern Importance & Performance Teacher Quality • 99% of parents rated this important • 67% of parents rated this great/good Academic Challenge • 97% of parents rated this important • 78% of parents rated this great/good Retention of Quality Teachers • 58% of the Community rated this as Strongly Agree/Agree

  8. Clubs, Athletics and Music Clubs, Athletics and Music received very high performance ratings. Importance & Performance Clubs • 78% of parents rated this important • 89% of parents rated this great/good Athletics • 65% of parents rated this important • 86% of parents rated this important Music • 64% of parents rated this important • 96% of parents rated this important

  9. Areas of Improvement Class Size Course Variety

  10. Class Size Class size is important to parents & teachers, however performance expectations are not being met Importance & Performance • Both parents and staff believe class size is important • Staff agree that class sizes of 24 and under are optimal • 56% of staff and 62% of parents believe the current performance is sufficient

  11. Top Areas for More Course Variety • Engineering/Robotics, Coding/Computer Programing, and Business class offerings rank in the top four • Followed closely by Science and Math • Consistent responses between community and students

  12. Areas of Concern Technology Funding Discipline Teacher to Student Feedback Students connection to school and their peers/culture Safety

  13. Technology Use of technology to teach and learn is rated as important Should be Given Additional Funding Essential to Students’ Daily Curriculum for Future Success • More than 80% of all respondents agree on the importance of technology in learning • Consistent rating among current and former parents • 87% of respondents believe technology should be given additional funding

  14. Technology • Top priorities in technology were improving wireless access and replacing aging computers • Teachers indicated time and training were important to using technology in the classroom

  15. KP is Adequately Funded Relative to Surrounding Districts Adequate funding for KP is a concern • Only 30% of respondents agree that KP is adequately funded

  16. Discipline Discipline is a concern across all parents, students and staff Importance & Performance • The importance of maintaining discipline is clear for parents (85%) and staff alike (94%) • 48% of parents and 73% of staff rated this as fair/poor • Only 42% of parents feel that KP is adequately funded for discipline

  17. Teacher to Student Feedback Feedback is a priority for parents, students and staff Importance & Performance • Students rate teacher/student feedback as important • 44% of students give Teacher Feedback a great/good performance rating

  18. I Feel a Positive Connection to My School A low percentage of students feel a strong positive connection to the school • 42% of Middle School students agree/strongly agree that they have a positive connection to their school • 22% of High School students agree/strongly agree that they have a positive connection to their school

  19. Student Well-Being and School Environment • Students rate safety as their highest in importance and 50% rate performance as good/great • 70% of students rated a clean environment as fair/poor 19

  20. KP CWG 17/18 Survey Results Areas of Success Areas of Improvement Areas or Concern Quality education Class Size Technology Teacher quality Funding Course variety Academic Challenge Discipline • Co-Extra Curricular • Athletics • Music • Clubs Teacher to Student Feedback Students connection to school and their peers/culture Safety

  21. Next Steps Xxx

More Related