1 / 19

ACS Meeting March 25, 2007

ACS Meeting March 25, 2007. MBITA Meeting June 22, 2007. Global drinking water issues and solutions. MBITA Meeting • Santa Cruz • June 22, 2007. MBITA Meeting June 22, 2007. Table of Contents. • The Global Situation - Industrialized World - Developing Nations • Consequences

marcos
Télécharger la présentation

ACS Meeting March 25, 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ACS Meeting March 25, 2007 MBITA Meeting June 22, 2007

  2. Global drinking water issues and solutions MBITA Meeting • Santa Cruz • June 22, 2007

  3. MBITA Meeting June 22, 2007 Table of Contents • • The Global Situation • - Industrialized World • - Developing Nations • • Consequences • • What to do

  4. The Global Situation • Industrialized nations, with an aging infrastructure face significant problems, aggravated by increasing levels of industrial pollutants. • Developing nations, in their efforts to industrialize, have not invested in water treatment and distribution commensurate with population growth. As a result, drinking water quality at times reach levels that threaten widespread health. Source: Data from Shiklormance and Rodda, 2004. Freshwater has a global volume of 35.2 million cubic kilmetres.

  5. Fresh Water In Decline • Global water supply dropped by33% since 1970* • Fresh water scarcity growing regionally • Water tables dropping (USGS) • Salt water incursions (USGS) • Saline in ground water (USGS) • Fresh water contamination • Contaminated drinking water is responsible for a large percentage of human disease (WHO – World Health Organization) • 2,000 new chemical compounds introduced each year** • 99.5% of chemicals in the U.S. do not have a federal or state standard** * Bernadette McDonald & Douglas Jehl, “Whose Water Is It?” ** Patrick Sullivan, Franklin Agardy, James Clark, “America's Threatened Drinking Water”

  6. Fresh Water In Decline Centuries-old infrastructure • Waste and fresh water pipes crossed over in Atlanta resulting in tap water that looked like beer (U.S. News & World Report) • 650 water mains break every day, chronic leakage in about 20-30% of the infrastructure (USGS) • Debris, fecal matter, drugs and toxins get sucked into “fresh” water pipes (USGS and U.S. News & World Report)

  7. The Result Increasing Contamination • 54 million+ people in the U.S. with arsenic in tap water at unsafe levels - NRDC • Estimated 15 million to 40 million+ people in the U.S. with MTBE in tap water or water source (no federal guidelines) - EWG • 20 million+ people in the U.S. with perchlorate in their tap water (no federal guidelines) - EWG • More than 4,000 reported health-based violations in community water systems in the U.S. affecting 23 million people – EPA • In the US alone, it is estimated that industry generates about 36.3 billion kg of hazardous organo-pollutants each year, with only about 10 percent disposed of in an environmentally responsible manner (Reddy and Mathew, 2001). Growing Consumer Fears Fuel Bottled Water Demand • $9+ billion spent in 2004 on bottled water in the U.S. • Safety of tap water is biggest reason consumers purchase bottled water • 240 to 10,000+ times more expensive per gallon of bottled water than average tap water • The World Health Organization (WHO, 2000) warns that bottled water can • actually have a greater bacterial count than municipal water. • • In the United States, the standards by which bottled water is regulated • (FDA) are actually lower than those for tap water (regulated by the EPA) • (Gleick et al., 2004).

  8. Recognition of the Problem • “Well water often contaminated, but few know it. They say one in five homeowners with wells would find elevated levels of either of two common contaminants, nitrate or coliform bacteria, if they tested their water. The state doesn’t require such tests, however, and only one in 20 households check the condition of their well water. Of Minnesota’s 400,000 active wells, 25 percent test positive at any given time for coliform, 4.5 percent for fecal coliform, and 5 percent have high nitrate levels…” • St. Paul Pioneer Press, July 3, 2005 • “Regular showers may cause brain damage: US study. Scientists believe that breathing in small amounts of manganese dissolved in the water may harm the nervous system. ‘Nearly nine million people in the United States are exposed to manganese levels that our study shows may cause toxic effects.If our results are confirmed, they could have profound implications for the nation and the world,’ said Dr John Spangler, from Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C.” • The Sydney Morning Herald, July 3, 2005 “Chloramines again linked to lead in drinking water. High blood lead levels discovered in two boys this spring are being linked to drinking water in Greenville, N.C. Local public health authorities are advising pregnant women, infants, and young children to avoid tap water, and state officials are evaluating drinking water throughout the state.” Environmental Science & Technology, June 29, 2005 • “New Yorkers advised to boil tap water,” stated a New York newspaper after city officials warned sick and frail New Yorkers to boil their tap water after muddy runoff into the city’s reservoirs caused a glitch in purifying drinking water.”New York Daily News, June 1, 2005

  9. Source: NSCS ad ca. 2000

  10. In Europe, the Situation is Similar Release of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Directly or Indirectly to Water in Thirteen EU Member States, 2003 Industrial plants for pulp from timber or other fibrous materials and paper or board production (>20t/d) - 240,771,200.00 kg Installations for the disposal of non-hazard waste (>50t/d) and landfills (>10t/d) - 123,851,400kg Basic organic chemicals - 41,957,238.80k Others - 30,943.80kg Slaughterhouses (>50t/d), plants for the production of milk (>200t/d), other aanir raw materials (>75t/d) or vegetable raw materials (>300t/d) - 18,628,850.00kg Source: EC 2004

  11. Contamination in the Industrial Worldis Widespread

  12. Coli Bacteria predominatesin Developing Nations

  13. The Consequences • Every year, in the poorest countries, approximately 10.8 million children die before their fifth birthday, mainly due to poor water quality. Of these, 4 million die before they reach 1 month old. • Twenty-six countries with a combined population of more than 350 million people are located in regions with severe water scarcity • The combination of population growth, future declines in clean water availability, and global warming will further aggravate this situation. Source: (WWDR2)

  14. The Consequences • More than half of European cities are currently exploiting groundwater at unsustainable rates. • In most urban areas in low- and middle income countries, between one-quarter and one-half of the population lacks provision for water and sanitation (UNHABITAT, 2003a) • And, if climate change follows the projected scenarios, we can expect more than 2.8 billion people at risk of water shortages (WWDR2). Source: Environment Canada, 2005

  15. The Consequences • The annual number of dysentery episodes caused by Shigella throughout the world was estimated to be 164.7 million, of which 163.2 million were in developing countries (Kosek et al., 2003). • Salinization seriously affects 20 to 30 million ha worldwide (25% under irrigation in arid and semi-arid zones and about 10% of all areas under irrigation-Smedema and Shiati, 2002).

  16. What to do • In the industrialized world, given the multiple sources of contamination and the ageing infrastructure, the solution is POU/POE treatment systems and, ultimately, massive infrastructure rehabilitation using novel technologies. Source: Foster et al., 2005

  17. An Effective POU Solution • Sylvan Source Technology: • An ultra-clean water system utilizing a proprietary distillation and steam separation method to safely reduce contaminants in tap water • More effective at reducing more contaminants than any other product or technology • IAPMO, UL, and NSF certified (Standard 62 plus perchlorate) • State certified in CA, MA, and WI • Automated and self-cleaning requiring no cartridges, membranes or chemicals • Up to six gallons of water per day with multiple points of delivery (such as faucets, standard ice-makers and other water resources)

  18. Comparative Performance Sodium Chloride (NaCl) is a reasonable proxy for “salts” such as nitrates, sulfates, chlorides, perchlorate; and heavy metals such as lead, mercury, antimony and arsenic present in water as salts. Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) is a reasonable proxy for Dioxin, Phenol, EPTC, chloroneb, epichlorohydrin, trans-nonachlor, and endosulfan sulfate. Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) is a reasonable proxy for MTBE, PCBs, acetone, chlordane, trifluralin, nitroso-diphenylamine, DBCP, di nitro toluene, and diethyl phthalate. Source: Internal Sylvan Source testing

  19. In Third World Countries • Any solution must be (a) affordable, (b) implementable by small communities, and (c) control micro-biologicals—the leading health risk. • Initially, filtration + disinfection appears attractive (e.g., UV rather than ozonation) • Eventually, community-sized systems based on distillation + heat recovery or solar are likely solutions.

More Related