130 likes | 288 Vues
Network PC Power Management. June 28, 2011 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Bob Tingleff SBW Consulting, Inc. Status. Provisionally deemed UES since May, 2010 SBW presented an update May, 2011 Incorporated Cadmus/PSE and Avista studies
E N D
Network PC Power Management June 28, 2011 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Bob Tingleff SBW Consulting, Inc.
Status • Provisionally deemed UES since May, 2010 • SBW presented an update May, 2011 • Incorporated Cadmus/PSE and Avista studies • Minor changes based on review of literature • HVAC factor findings • Different than lighting • Difficult to pin down • RTF Decision: Use lighting HVAC factors • Large office, K-12, Other (small office/RTU HVAC) • This path incorporates an impact appropriate to building type/HVAC system
Measure Definition – 9 measures rather than 1 due to HVAC factors • 3 building/business types • Large Office (central HVAC) • K-12 • Other, represented by Small Office (RTU) • 3 HVAC system types • Electric • Heat pump • Gas
Key Parameters • Power draw of desktop • Mix of Class A, B, C, D, Energy Star compliant and not • Power draw of monitor • 2008 E-Star LCD (lower power when sleeping) • Baseline time spent in low and high power • Shift in annual hours due to measure • 23% of annual hours shift from high to low power • Supported by Cadmus/PSE study • Consistent with earlier studies
Key Parameters • Rate of successful installation of power management software • May change over time – new computers, software defeated intentionally or accidentally, bugs, IT diligence • No empirical basis for measure persistence • Load shapes show far from complete success (next slide) • Previous analysis derated savings based on an assumed installation rate • Current analysis already includes the installation rate in the average hourly shift
Do we need to adjust savings by business type? • Because of HVAC factors we now have K-12, Large Office, Other (small office HVAC) • Annual and daily schedules differ • Adjusting the overall load shape to match K-12, office results in an annual savings difference of 5% • Other schedules are hard to quantify • => Use office hours for all measures • Two Procostload shapes: Office, K-12
Savings Impact • Without HVAC factors: 26% increase • Monitor savings increased from 11 kWh/yr. to 18 • Lower power draw in sleep mode in newer monitors • Previous analysis derrated savings by assumed installation rate of power management software • This analysis finds that empirical studies already incorporate this factor • Newer computers have lower sleep-mode power • New studies find a couple more percent shifted to low power by measure
Savings Impact: Difference with Cadmus/PSE study • Cadmus: 128 kWh/yr. • This analysis: 145 kWh/yr. • Monitor savings: 18 kWh/yr. vs. 11 • Idle power draw of desktop: 64W vs. 60W • 64W is based on sales data • Could argue that schools and other likely environments will buy smaller computers • Don’t really know the mix • Cadmus data show many computers at 80W or more (63W average at non-participant sites)
Recommendations • Set status to Active • Sunset criteria • Desktop power draw will change • Baseline rate of power management may change • 2 years max
RTF Proposed Motion: “I _________ move that the RTF approve the Network PC Power Management UES measure to Active status with a sunset date of July, 2013.”