Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer

1. Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer XXII Urologic Oncology Conference Portugal J.Edson Pontes M.D.

3. The Inability to Predict Response to Therapy as a consequence of unpredictable Tumor Biology provides an Argument for Surgical Excision since the “CURE” of an excised Tumor is independent of its responsiveness to alternatives TherapiesWhitmore,W. Urol.Clin NA 1984

4. Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy • Is the most utilized surgical approach • Understanding of the Anatomy has decreased intraoperative complications and surgical time. • Pain control has decreased LOS and cost

12. Indications for open radical prostatectomy • Complications during robotic surgery: respiratory, vascular, iatrogenic rectal injury. • Salvage Procedures? • Morbid obesity

16. AVERAGE LOS BEFORE and AFTER CCP LOS

17. COMPLICATION RATES BEFORE and AFTER CCP

18. Pathological Stage OC EPE M(-) SM EPE M(+) SV LN

19. VARIABILITY AMONG SURGEON’S ON CANCER CONTROL AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY Bianco FJ.1AD, Vickers A.12A, Serio A.12A, Eastham JA.1A, Kline EA.1A, Reuther A.1B, Kattan MW.3B, Pontes JE.1C, Scardino PT.1A Departments of Urology1, Biostatistics2 and Quantitative Health Sciences3 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.A Cleveland Clinic Foundation.B Wayne State University.C George Washington University.D

20. 7765 CANCER CONTROL 5 YEARS AFTER RP

21. 5-YR BCR-FREE PROBABILITIES BY SURGEON EXPERIENCEVickers & Bianco et al. JNCI (2008)

22. VARIATION AMONG SURGEONS • Significant heterogeneity in BCR rates was observed between surgeons (p<0.01) • I2 = 0.38, implies that 38% of the observed difference in BCR rates between surgeons can be explained by genuine differences in surgical technique and approach, rather than by chance alone

23. Parameters of Comparison between different techniques • Positive Surgical Margins( M+) • Continence • Potency • Complications • Cancer Control

24. How Surgeons are trained • In open radical prostatectomy, the surgical skills are the same as for other open procedures. The number of cases, and “Hands” will determine how good you perform the operation. Since surgical skills are very individual, learning curves are variable and the results among surgeons different.

25. How Surgeons are trained • In Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy, new surgical skills are needed. There is a long learning curve, and you still need “Hands”

26. How Surgeons are Trained • In Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy, new surgical skills are needed, there is a shorter learning curve and “Hands” are less important. And this is a good thing! It may equalize surgeons.

27. Risk- Adjusted Analysis of positive surgical Margins Following Laparoscopic and Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy.Touijer, K. et al. Eur. Urol. 2007No difference in PSM rates among the 2 procedures.

28. Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic Review and cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies.Ficarra, V. et al Eur.Urol 2009

29. Surgery and Marketing: comparing different methods of radical prostatectomy. • “available data were not sufficient to prove the superiority of any surgical approach in terms of functional and oncological outcomes”. • What matters is that surgery is done by an expert.. Marketing and the generation of myths surrounding different techniques have obscured this fundamental truth • Wirth, M. and Hakenberg Eur. Urol. 2009

30. CONCLUSIONS • Radical Prostatectomy is an excellent option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. • At the present there is no difference in outcome among patients treated with open, LAP or RALP. • Urologists however should use these new techniques as Tools to facilitate their surgical skills.