30 likes | 150 Vues
This study examines evaluations of individuals portrayed as masculine, feminine, androgynous, or undifferentiated. Androgynous individuals are liked most and perceived as well-adjusted, while undifferentiated are liked least. Implications for psychology and the importance of assessing masculinity and femininity traits are discussed. Should an "undifferentiated" category be added? Understanding the literature on masculinity/femininity is crucial.
E N D
Major, Brenda, Carnevale, Peter J.D., & Deaux, Kay. (1981). A different perspective on androgyny: Evaluations of masculine and feminine personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 988-1001. Powerpoint Abstract By Halford H. Fairchild September 16, 2010
Abstract • Examined R’s evaluations of people who were portrayed as masculine, feminine, androgynous (both m&f) or undifferentiated (neither m&f). • Androgynous liked best and seen as most adjusted • Undifferentiated liked least and least adjusted. • M&F - midway
Implications for Psych 104 • The set of items that assesses masculinity & femininity are crucial independent variables. • Should we add an “undifferentiated” category (“neither masculine nor feminine”) • We should know this literature – on masculinity/femininity