SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Complex Cognitive Processes

mariel avatar
34 diapositives · 532 Views · Jul 30, 2014

Complex Cognitive Processes. Magdalena Mulvihill. The problem Solving model. Represent the problem. Select a strategy. Identify the problem. Implement the strategy. Evaluate the results. Well defined problem.

Complex Cognitive Processes - slide 1
01 / 34Complex Cognitive Processes
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Complex Cognitive Processes
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Complex Cognitive Processes Magdalena Mulvihill

  2. The problem Solving model

  3. Represent the problem Select a strategy Identify the problem Implement the strategy Evaluate the results

  4. Well defined • problem

  5. A problem that has only one correct solution to a certain method of finding it.

  6. But… Even though some teachers claim that they explain the problem well some students think different

  7. Ill defined

  8. A problem that has more than one acceptable solution, an ambiguous goal, and no generally agreed upon strategy for reaching a solution

  9. $2.00 per cookie or per pound ? =6 2+2+2=6

  10. Algorithm A specific set of steps for solving a problem

  11. heuristics GENERALY, WIDELY APPLICABLE PROBLEM SOLVING STRATEGIES

  12. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY BETWEEN EXPERTS AND NOVICES

  13. BECAUSE EXPERTS ARE INDIVIDUALS… …WHO ARE HIGHLY SKILLED OR KNOWLEDGEABLE IN A GIVEN DOMAIN

  14. THERE EXIST FOUR IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NOVICES AND EXPERTS

  15. When REPRESENTING PROBLEMS 1 EXPERTS SEARCH FOR CONTEXT AND RELATIONSHIP IN PROBLEMS NOVICES SEE PROBLEMS IN ISOLATED PIECES

  16. PROBLEM-SOLVING EFFICIENCY 2 EXPERTS SOLVE PROBLEMS RAPIDLY AND POSSES MUCH KNOWLEDGE THAT IS AUTHOMATIC NOVICES SOLVE PROBLEMS SLOWLY AND FOCUS ON MECANICS

  17. When PLANNING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING 3 EXPERTS PLAN CAREFULLY BEFORE ATTEMPTING SOLUTIONS TO UNFAMILIAR PROBLEMS NOVICES PLAN BRIEFLY WHEN ATTEMPTING SOLUTIONS TO UNFAMILIAR PROBLEMS; QUICKLY ADOPT AND TRY SOLUTIONS

  18. When MONITORING PROBLEM SOLVING 4 EXPERTS DEMONSTRATE WELL-DEVELOPED METACOGNITIVE ABILITIES; ABANDON INEFICIENT STRATEGIES NOVICES DEMONSTRATE LIMITED METACOGNITION; PERSEVERE WITH UNPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES

  19. STEPS IN HELPING LEARNERS BECOME BETTER PROBLEM SOLVERS

  20. 1. PRESENTATION OF PROBLEMS

  21. PRESESNTATION OF PROBLEM IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT ENCOURAGES LEARNERS TO CONCEPTUALIZE IT IN FAMILIAR TERM

  22. WHEN PRESENTING REMEMBER TO 1. START IN MININGFULL TERMS 2. RELATE IT TO A FAMILIAR PROBLEM 3. PROVIDE EXAMPLES IN A REAL-WORLD CONTEXT PROMOTING MININGFULL LEARNING 4. REPRESENT IT VISUALY

  23. 2. SOCIAL INTERACTION

  24. When presenting real world problems promote high levels of interaction to actively engage students in analyzing problem situations

  25. 3. SCAFOLDING METHODS • - Modeling • - Thinking aloud • - Questioning • Adapting • instructional • materials

  26. EFECTIVE STRATEGIES • NOTE TAKING • MAPPING • USING TEXT SIGNALS • SUMMARIZING • ELABORATIVE • QUESTIONING

  27. TRANSFER OF KNOWLEDGE

  28. GENERAL TRANSFER THE ABILITY TO APPLY KNOWLEDGE OR SKILLS LEARNED IN ONE CONTEXT IN A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT CONTEXTS SPECIFIC TRANSFER THE ABILITY TO APPLY INFORMATION IN A CONTEXT SIMILAR TO THE ONE IN WHICH IT WAS ORIGINALLY LEARNED

  29. FACTORS AFFECTING LEARNING SITUATIONS

  30. 1. SIMILARITY BETWEEN LEARNING SITUATIONS 2. DEPTH OF LEARNERS’ ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING 3. QUALITY AND VARIETY OF EXAMPLES AND OTHER LEARNING EXPERIENCES 4. LEARNING CONTEXT 5. EMPHASIS ON METACOGNITION

  31. ∏ ∏ THE END