1 / 20

Purdue’s System-Wide Deployment of a Classroom Response System

Purdue’s System-Wide Deployment of a Classroom Response System. By Steven M. Lichti Teaching and Learning Technologies Information Technology at Purdue. Introduction. About Purdue University Land-grant institution founded in 1869 38,000 students at West Lafayette campus

marsha
Télécharger la présentation

Purdue’s System-Wide Deployment of a Classroom Response System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Purdue’s System-Wide Deployment of a Classroom Response System By Steven M. Lichti Teaching and Learning Technologies Information Technology at Purdue Steven M. Lichti

  2. Introduction • About Purdue University • Land-grant institution founded in 1869 • 38,000 students at West Lafayette campus • 24,000 students at regional campuses Steven M. Lichti

  3. Information Technology at Purdue (ITaP) • Responsible for planning and coordinating central computing and telecommunications systems • Teaching and Learning Technologies • Classrooms, computer labs, course-management system, faculty consulting, instructional development, classroom response system Steven M. Lichti

  4. History of Technology in the Classroom (TIC) • TIC program began in 1998 • Began with two classrooms (Electrical Engineering and Physics) • Grown to 219 classrooms w/tech. in Fall 2007 • TIC Management • Support classroom computing across campus • Support faculty; enhance learning through technology Steven M. Lichti

  5. How CRS Began at Purdue • Critical mass of faculty interested in a classroom response system • Technology was researched, multiple vendors investigated • Pre-Purchase evaluation • Evaluated eInstruction and EduCue (now iPRS) • Cost / Benefit • Technology (IR vs. RF) • User Friendliness – software? • Supportability – would we require a small army? • Scalability – could we make it available everywhere? Steven M. Lichti

  6. Product Evaluation • Deciding upon a vendor • Decision stakeholders • IT staff, faculty, students • Collaboration with eInstruction • Working together, solving problems Steven M. Lichti

  7. Funding • Received initial funding through grant from the Provost for Educational Technology • Maintenance included in contract • Institutionally absorbed student registration fees Steven M. Lichti

  8. Pilot Study • Conducted pilot study in 13 classrooms with 15 professors across 8 disciplines encompassing 3,000 students • Chemistry, Communications, Computer Technology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Forestry and Natural Resources, Management, Organizational Leadership and Supervision, and Physics • Class sizes range from 18 to 900 Steven M. Lichti

  9. Technology in the Classroom • Standardized Computer Equipment • 3.4GHz PC w/17” LCD • Gyration wireless mouse receiver and charging cradle • eInstruction CPSRF receiver • A/V Equipment • Crestron Control Systems Steven M. Lichti

  10. Wide-Scale Deployment • Deployed receivers into 200+ classrooms • Wide availability, classroom independent, large or small classes ~450 Students ~200 Students Steven M. Lichti

  11. Challenges (Hardware) • Hardware Integration • Prior limited experimentation with IR devices • Difficult to scale – multiple receivers required • Great improvement using RF devices • RF signal multi-directional / IR signal line-of-sight Steven M. Lichti

  12. Challenges (Registration) • Response Pad Registration • Occurred via CPSOnline (eInstruction.com) • Students responsible for entering correct information • Nicknames, non-university email accounts, incorrect response pad serial number Steven M. Lichti

  13. Development of the Proxy Tool for WebCT/Vista • eInstruction developed WebCT-based registration tool at Purdue’s request • Used to decrease registration difficulty; create single point of registration • Official name, email address and correct course • Increase student privacy (FERPA) • Grade upload capability Steven M. Lichti

  14. Future of the Classroom Response System • Second-generation system • New response pads (with LCDs) • Automatic joining • New receivers • Upgraded software and power point integration Steven M. Lichti

  15. Usage Statistics: Fall 2006 Steven M. Lichti

  16. Usage: Courses per Semester Steven M. Lichti

  17. Usage: Seats per Semester Steven M. Lichti

  18. Suggestions for Future Users • Convince administration that classroom response technology would be valuable to teaching and learning • Development concise directions and documentation • Work closely with vendor to establish efficient procedures • Provide regular training to faculty Steven M. Lichti

  19. Suggestions for Future Users (continued…) • Keep in contact with faculty to ensure their needs are met • Keep faculty and departments informed of any changes • Inform bookstore textbook managers there is a campus standard • Understand political and security implications of communicating student data between university-hosted and vendor-hosted systems Steven M. Lichti

  20. Acknowledgements • Many thanks to Ed Evans, Director of Learning Spaces for providing a great deal of historical data Steven M. Lichti

More Related