1 / 10

Walmart Recruiting – Store Sales Forecasting

Walmart Recruiting – Store Sales Forecasting. Chaoyi Liu, Yuqing Lu, Haoran Wu Rajendran , Goutham. The dataset we choose. <Features> · Store - the store number · Date - the week · Temperature - average temperature in the region · Fuel Price - cost of fuel in the region

martin-blanchard
Télécharger la présentation

Walmart Recruiting – Store Sales Forecasting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WalmartRecruiting – Store Sales Forecasting Chaoyi Liu, Yuqing Lu, HaoranWu Rajendran, Goutham

  2. The dataset we choose • <Features> • ·Store - the store number • ·Date - the week • ·Temperature - average temperature in the region • ·Fuel Price - cost of fuel in the region • ·MarkDown1-5 - data is only available after Nov 2011, • ·CPI - the consumer price index • ·Unemployment - the unemployment rate • ·IsHoliday - whether the week is a special holiday week • <Feature> provided parameters may affect weekly sales, but did not provide weekly sales. • <Train> • Store - the store number • ·Dept - the department number • ·Date - the week • ·Weekly Sales - sales for the given department in the given store • ·IsHoliday - whether the week is a special holiday week • <Train> provided sales data of 45 stores with up to 99 departments in more than 421,000 records, and didn’t sum each store’s weekly sales up.

  3. Then we integrated two datasets • So initially, we integrated these two massive tables into one that has everything we need with 6,435 records like this: • Store • Date • Temperature • Fuel_Price • MarkDown1-5 • CPI • Unemployment • IsHoliday • Weekly_Sales We decide to divide the whole 6,435 records equally into 5 groups each contain 1,287 records by quinquesection from small to big like this:

  4. Neural Network Model • It is for complicated prediction problems • Visualization or understanding of the rules are not needed • Accuracy is very important

  5. Result Learning Rate / Training Cycles = 0.03/2000 Accuracy = 70.61% It is easy to find out that Accuracy achieve 70.61% when Learning Rate is 0.03 and will increase as well as Training Cycles increasing

  6. Neural Network Weights Hidden Layer:

  7. Output:

  8. Naïve Bayes Accuracy = 18.63% Why Naïve Bayes performances “idiot” on this sample? Because variable Store, Data to IsHoliday are independent on each other, so: P(Store,Date,Temperature, … & IsHoliday)=P(Store)*P(Date)*…..*P(IsHoliday) Due to so many numbers in columns Store , Date, … IsHoliday that do not repeat , the probability of each Variables is too small. So P(Store)*P(Date)*…..*P(IsHoliday) will be far lower than 1/6435. This means the probability of sales basing such a model is infeasible.

  9. K-NN When K = 1, Accuracy = 26% When K = 10, Accuracy = 29.03%

  10. Conclusion • MarkDown 1 to 5 has the highest weight as 16 which mean it really makes an enormous impact on the sales. Promotion will increase weekly sales remarkably. • Fuel price and temperature also makes a positive impact, higher price makes higher sales. • CPI and Unemployment rate having a heavy negative impact on the prospects of sales. The higher CPI and unemployment rate, the less weekly sales. • Holidays affect weekly sales slightly. I think customers don’t care whether today is holiday or not, the only reason they buy items is promotion.

More Related