1 / 20

Studies „… Subject Specific Requirements …“

Studies „… Subject Specific Requirements …“. Wolfram Horstmann. OpenAIRE Overview. Comments. Additional comments. OpenAIRE - factsheet. Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe Programme : FP7 – Research Infrastructures Starting date: December 1, 2009 Duration: 36 months

marvel
Télécharger la présentation

Studies „… Subject Specific Requirements …“

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Studies „… SubjectSpecificRequirements…“ Wolfram Horstmann

  2. OpenAIRE Overview Comments Additional comments

  3. OpenAIRE - factsheet Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe • Programme: FP7 – Research Infrastructures • Starting date: December 1, 2009 • Duration: 36 months • Budget: 4.1 Million • 38 partners covering all European member-states • To be reached at www.openaire.eu OpenAIRE Project Overview

  4. University of Athens (coordinator) University of GoettingenLibrary (scientific coordinator) CNR-ISTI (technical coordinator) University of Bielefeld Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) CERN SURF ICM – University of Warsaw University of Minho University of Gent Library eIFL Technical University Denmark Partners • Scientific Communities • Health (Life Sciences) • EMBL-EBI • Environment • World Data Center for Climate • Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) • Information & Communication Science • Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) • Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) • Liaison Offices OpenAIRE Project Overview

  5. Liaison Offices Region 1 North(DTU) Region 2 South(UMINHO) Region 3 East(eIFL) Region 4 West(UGENT) Denmark (Danish Technical University) Cyprus (UniverstityofCyprus) Bulgaria (BulgarianAcademyofSciences) Austria (University of Wien) Finland (University of Helsinki) Greece (National Documentation Center) Czech Republic (Technical University of Ostrava) Belgium (Universtiyof Gent) Sweden (National Library ofSweden) Italy (CASPAR) France (Couperin) Estonia (University of Tartu) Malta (Malta Council for Science & Technology) Hungary (HUNOR) Germany (University ofKostanz) Latvia (University ofLatvia) Portugal (University ofMinho) Ireland (Trinity College) Spain (SpanishFoundationfor Science & Technology) Lithuania (Kaunas Technical University) Netherlands (Utrecht University) Poland (ICM – University ofWarsaw) UK (SHERPA) Romania (Kosson) Slovakia (university Library of Bratislava) OpenAIRE Project Overview Slovenia (University ofLjubljana)

  6. European Helpdesk • Promote FP7-pilot and ERC OA guidelines • National Open Access Liaison Offices (27 countries) • Provide OA “toolkits” for • Researchers • Institutions • Setup 24/7 portal for deposit, search of OA publications • Liaison with • Other European OA initiatives • Publishers • CRIS systems OpenAIRE Project Overview

  7. Supporting Repository Infrastructure • OpenAIRE portal built on D-NET • Access to scientific publications • Search, browse • Visualization tools • Deposition of articles • Setup repository for orphan researchers (INVENIO) • Harvest OA publications from existing repositories • Provide monitoring tools for • Document/depositing statistics • Usage statistics from repository infrastructure • Interoperation with other infrastructures OpenAIRE Project Overview

  8. OpenAIRE in a nutshell OpenAIRE overall overview: functionalities and domains served OpenAIRE Project Overview

  9. Research data management • Explore the requirements, practices, incentives, workflows, data models, and technologies to deposit, access, and otherwise manipulate research datasets • Produce feasibility studies to show researchers the benefit from depositing • Work with four (4) scientific communities • Health (Life Sciences) • Environment • Information & Communication Science • Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities OpenAIRE Project Overview

  10. Subject-specific requirements and data challenges Comments Work Package 7, Task 7.1 (WP7 / T7.1)

  11. T7.1 – The Basics • Objective • Elucidatesubjectspecificrequirementsfor OA • Method • Case studies / Comparativeapproach • Result • Road Map Report („Book“) Deliverable D7.2 • Dates • Runtime: June 2010 to November 2011 M7 to M24 = 18 Months • Milestone M7.1 • Kick-off („preparatoyworkshop“): 8/9-JUNE-2010 Studies on Disciplinary Requirements for OA Infrastructure – Preparatory Workshop

  12. The ‚Book‘: A tentative outline • Exec. Summary • Introduction • Questions/Methods • Intro: Whatis Research Infrastructure andwhatis OA? • SubjectChapters • Analysis • Comparisons • Accompanying Research ? • Synthesis • Conclusions / Road Map / Recommendations • SubjectChapters • Health (Life Sciences) • EMBL-EBI • Environment • World Data Center for Climate • Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) • Information & Communication ScienceChallenge 2: Cognitive Systems, Interaction, Robotics • Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) • Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) • Energy / Science in Society / Research Infrastructure E-Infrastructures • Not foreseen: Voluntary ??? Studies on Disciplinary Requirements for OA Infrastructure – Preparatory Workshop

  13. Objectivesofthestudy • Research activityfocussing on post 2011/12 • Practicalexperimentationwithin OpenAIRE not foreseen but welcome • Subject „Chapters“: Understand theirspecificity • Description andanalysisofdiversity: publicationbehavior, subjectclassification, datatypes, researchworkflows, infrastructures … • Requirementsforthepublicationdepositprocess • Requirementsforfutureinfrastructures • GiveAdvicetofuturedirections (EC, others) • Howtorespectsubjectspecificity in OA-Infra.? Studies on Disciplinary Requirements for OA Infrastructure – Preparatory Workshop

  14. „When I readthisreport … • … I expectanswerstothesequestions“ • Whatis Research Infrastructure andwhathas Open Access to do withit? • Whichaspectsaregenericandwhichaspectsaresubjectspecific? • Whicharethosesubjectspecificaspects? • Whatarethecomplexitiesinvolved? • Howrepresentativecan a singleinstitutebefor a completescientificarea? Studies on Disciplinary Requirements for OA Infrastructure – Preparatory Workshop

  15. Whatmakesthisstudyunique? • Different fromotheractivities / studies • Combinationofcasestudiesbyhighlyspecificandreputatedinstitutuesandgeneralfutureperspectives on OA (researchdata) isnovel • Supplementarytoother OA studiesor ESFRI… • „Case Studies“ meansthateachpartnerrepresents (‚only‘) thepartnerinstitution • NoneedtorepresentthecompleteThematic Area (e.g. Health, ICT…) • institutionalsubjectivityisallowed, evendesired: Find yourself-interest! Studies on Disciplinary Requirements for OA Infrastructure – Preparatory Workshop

  16. Agenda & Objectivesofthemeeting

  17. After thisworkshop… … weshouldhavesomeanswerstothefollowing … • Forsubjectspecialists • Howspecial am I? • Howcan I usethestudiestomakesomethingusefulformyinstitution? • Whataspectshavetoberespected in my ‚chapter‘? • Whatcan I write in my ‚chapter‘? • For all • A visionoftheresult– structureofthe ‚book‘ • A pictureofthespecificworkplan • For Bielefeld • An pictureaboutintroduction / analysis / synthesis • Methodologicalapproachtoaccompanyingstudies Studies on Disciplinary Requirements for OA Infrastructure – Preparatory Workshop

  18. Agenda: Introductory Session • 13.00-13.10Welcome by the Centre for Interdisciplinary ResearchBritta Padberg, Bielefeld (DE) • 13.10-13.30 EC approach to OA infrastructures: latest developmentsJarkko Siren, DG-INFSO, European Commission, Brussels (BE) • 13.30-14.00 The OpenAIRE project and the role of studies on disciplinary requirements Wolfram Horstmann, Bielefeld (DE) Studies on Disciplinary Requirements for OA Infrastructure – Preparatory Workshop

  19. “What is your community story?” Disciplinary practice in digital information environments • 14.00-14.30European Bioinformatics Institute (European Molecular Biology Lab)Johanna McEntyre, Cambridge (UK) • <Coffee> • 14.45-15.15 Cognitive Interaction Technology - Center of ExcellencePhillip Cimiano, Bielefeld (DE) • 15.15-15.45 Biodiversity-International/CGIARChris Addison & Enrica Porcari, Rome (IT) • 15.45-16.15 Data Archiving and Networked ServiceRutger Kramer, The Hague (NL)<Coffee> • 16.30-17.30 Centre for Marine and Atmospheric Sciences*Michael Lautenschlager & Ilse Hamann, Hamburg (DE) • 17.00-17.30 Institute of Information Science and Technologies, ISTI-CNRDonatella Castelli &Paolo Manghi, Pisa (IT) • 17.30-18.00 Closing discussion / Collection of questions for Day 2 *shifted to 9am of Day 2 Studies on Disciplinary Requirements for OA Infrastructure – Preparatory Workshop

  20. Agenda: Day2 “Apples and Pears” – Exploring converging routes to the individual case studies • 09.00-10.30 Joint brainstorming on a common structure of “chapters” for the case studies* <COFFEE> “How the pros do it” – Exemplary methodologies of science and technology studies • 11.00-11.30 Ethnographic Methods in Science Studies Christian Meyer, Methods of empirical social studies, Sociology, Bielefeld (DE) • 11.30-12.00 OA to the communication system of science – Changing patterns of participationNiels Christian Taubert, Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Bielefeld (DE) • 12.00-12.30 Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines (a study by UC Berkeley)Christian Meier zu Verl, University Library, Bielefeld (DE) • 12.30-13.00 Q&A Session with the experts<LUNCH> “Arriving there” – Defining the scope and the plan of the studies • 14.00-15.30 Joint brainstorming on the structure of the whole “book” and how to arrive there • 15.30-16.00 Summary & Closing *see changes on Day 1 Studies on Disciplinary Requirements for OA Infrastructure – Preparatory Workshop

More Related