1 / 28

The WATERS Network: Conceptual Design Update

The WATERS Network: Conceptual Design Update. David Tarboton Utah State University Team: Barbara Minsker (PI) Jerry Schnoor, Chuck Haas, Roger Bales, Rick Hooper, Jami Montgomery, John Braden, Nick Clesceri, Martha Conklin, Beth Eschenbach, Ilya Zaslavsky with contributions from many others ….

matana
Télécharger la présentation

The WATERS Network: Conceptual Design Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The WATERS Network: Conceptual Design Update David Tarboton Utah State University Team: Barbara Minsker (PI) Jerry Schnoor, Chuck Haas, Roger Bales, Rick Hooper, Jami Montgomery, John Braden, Nick Clesceri, Martha Conklin, Beth Eschenbach, Ilya Zaslavsky with contributions from many others …

  2. WATer and Environmental Research Systems Network: WATERS Network The Waters Network seeks to examine the interactions between Earth Systems processes and human systems involved with the cycling of water, sediment, nutrients, and contaminants. Understanding how natural processes, technology, and humans interact in response to climate and population changes will provide the knowledge required to better manage water and the broader environment.

  3. Outline • Scaling as the integrative theme • Requirements tracing • Common observation requirements • National Network Design • Modeling platform for integration and hypothesis testing

  4. An Example of a Large-Scale Critical Water Process: • Gulf of Mexico hypoxia caused by runoff from Mississippi Basin • In 2007, dead zone was 7,900 mi2 Mississippi River meets the Gulf of Mexico (Source: http://www.gulfhypoxia.net)

  5. Scaling Challenges (e.g. in the Mississippi River Basin/Gulf Hypoxia) • Spatial • Our understanding of water comes primarily from small-scale experiments to understand individual processes. • Large-scale water processes are dynamic, non-linear combinations of individual processes that are not well understood. • How do localized actions (contaminant releases, water treatment, and management practices) accumulate at the river basin scale? • Temporal • Storms drive much of the runoff in short-term episodic events that are not well captured by current observations • Long-term effects of climate and population changes on large-scale systems cannot be predicted • Organizational • Disconnections between perceptions and attitudes on one hand and behavior on the other challenge the design of policies for water use • We know little about the dependence of effective institutional design and theory of adaptive organizational response to water problems WATERS Network proposes to use emerging sensing and information technology to integrate across multiple scales. Multi-scale water dynamics are a coupled human and natural system – interactions are not well understood

  6. Typical Small-Scale Experimentation: Preferential Flow in Soils (Markus Weiler, ETH Zurich)

  7. Patterns and self-organization in water systems at large scales: LANDSAT image over coastal Sarawak, Malaysia, 1996

  8. The Importance of Scales in Time Kirchner, HP Today, 2002

  9. Discovery Science, Nonlinearities, and Scaling Night-time reaeration due to cooling temperature in small streams! W. Q. Standard How do these effects integrate as small streams converge to larger scales? Instrumental Variation in D.O. at Clear Creek, Iowa, 2006 (Schnoor)

  10. How Can Basin-Scale Policy Adapt to Small-Scale Hydrologic Variation? Brozović et al. (2006)

  11. Integrated Infrastructure to Advance Knowledge Informatics/Cyberinfrastructure Observatories/ Experimental & Field Facilities Sensors & Measurement Facility Synthesis/Modeling User Community

  12. Community Science Priorities • CLEANER Committee Reports (http://www.watersnet.org/plngdocs.html) • CUAHSI Science Plan (http://www.cuahsi.org/SciPlan-20070402.html) • NRC CLEANER Report (http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11657.html) • Water, Earth, Biota (WEB) Report (http://cires.colorado.edu/science/groups/gupta/projects/web/) • CUAHSI vision and synthesis papers (http://www.cuahsi.org/news.html) • Many others

  13. Lead with the Science Precisely relate the measurements being proposed to the questions being addressed • Question/Topic • Importance • Barriers and Enabling Technology • Observatory Design • Network Design

  14. How do land-use changes affect sediment loading and contaminant transport? Enabling technology • Sediment source fingerprinting • Water quality sondes • Tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy Design • Observatory level • Spatially dense sonde network nested within sparse TDL network • Water flux infrastructure • Network level • Representative coverage of variability in climate, geology, population density, land use, etc.

  15. Plot Group Flux tower and footprint Streamgage Subwatershed How does vegetation mediate hydrologic processes? Enabling technology • LIDAR • Eddy covariance • Acoustic Doppler stream gauging • Fiber optic temperature sensing • Precipitation Radar • Multispectral imagery • Near surface geophysics Design • Observatory level • Nested instrument clusters in different vegetation classes and subwatersheds to provide measured closure of water balance • Network level • Representative coverage of variability in climate, geology, population density, land use, etc.

  16. How does source water quality variability affect water treatment? Enabling technology • Pathogen and other water quality sensors • Control algorithms Design • Facility level • Intake sensors • Watershed instrumentation for intake water quality forecasting • Multiple treatment trains for experimentation • Network level • Replication in different locales with differing source water qualities and influent characteristics

  17. How is the carrying capacity of a hydrologic region affected by physical processes, infrastructure investment and social organization? • Design • Observatory level • Stratification by geology, land use, human effects, land form • Network level • Stratification across climate and other strata constant at observatory level Enabling technology • Near surface geophysics • CFC and isotope dating and tracing technology • Tracer injection discharge techniques • Fiber optic temperature sensing • ADCP stream gauging • LIDAR • Managed system and human response sensing • Decision theatre

  18. Common Requirements Allow a Regional Focus Across National Scales • Fluxes and stores of water and contaminants at various scales • Meteorology (precip, evap, wind, solar, eddy) • Groundwater piezometry and quality • Soil moisture • Flow discharge, velocities, stage, bathymetry • Water quality (pH, temp, cond, turb,D.O.,chla) • Nutrients (NO3-, PO43-, DOC) for mass fluxes • Sediments (TSS, turbidity, bed load?) • Pathogens (Enterococcus, E. Coli, others)

  19. National Network Design • Enable multi-scale, dynamic predictive modeling for water, sediment, • and water quality (flux, flow paths, rates), including: • Near-real-time assimilation of data • High frequency measurements • Point- to national-scale prediction • Observatory provides data sets/framework to test: • Sufficient data to test science hypotheses • Alternative model conceptualizations across • entire range of attributes (popn., hydrology) • Master Design Variables: • Scale • Climate • Hydrologic setting • Land form and geology • Land use & population Nested Observatories over Range of Scales: Point to Plot (100 m2) Subcatchment (2 km2) Catchment (10 km2) – single land use Watershed (100–10,000 km2) – mixed use Basin (10,000–100,000 km2) Continental scale-up by HIS, models & remote sensing (MODIS, Landsat, flyovers)

  20. National Network Design Human dominated Environment (Anthropogenic Landscape) Concept: design and construct an observing and modeling system that addresses water dynamics over the full range of human and naturally dominated environments Naturally dominated Environment (Hydrologic Landscape)

  21. Population per unit area by county 1996 Population/Km2 0-5 5-10 10-20 20-50 > 50

  22. mm/year 0 0 – 1 1 – 10 10 – 100 > 100 Public supply water use intensity by county Source: USGS Estimated Water Use in the United States in the year 2000 http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2004/circ1268/

  23. Hydrologic Landscapes(Wolock et al., 2004)

  24. NETWORK DESIGN An example showing 9 categories of granular precipitation and population for conterminous U.S.

  25. Overlay Observatory 4-Digit Hydrologic Unit Codes onto the geospatial polygons of granular Popn/Precipitation… HUC-8 watersheds from USGS

  26. Hypothetical random examples from USGS 4 digit HUC’s that cover the Physiographic Attributes of the Nation. Statistical selection techniques indicate that 14 (or fewer) observatories can adequately cover all the attributes of the nation.

  27. National Modeling Platform • Models enable us to organize the information about very complex systems • Catalyst for advancing knowledge • Drive and exploit data fusion cyberinfrastructure • Drive and exploit sensor system • Drive and exploit experimental facility • Integrate knowledge across disciplines

  28. Questions ?

More Related